Nathan Drake vs Frank West

[Jasonsith]

Battle takes place in the center of a temple in the center of a real Angkor Wut in Cambodia with wild animals commonly found in Angkor Wut but no zombies. Both stands 100 m from each other

Both have sufficient supply of duct tapes.

Both have a grappling hook, 2 mini auto chainsaws, a rowing boat paddle and a machete as melee weapons.

For ranged weapons, both have 1 Glock 20 with 5 standard magazines each of 15 rounds, 1 Remington 1100 Tactical Shotgun in 12 gauge with 2 standard magazines each hoilding eight rounds (23Ôüä4"), 1 RPG-7 with 1 shot of a thermobaric explosive booster, and 6 Mills Bomb grenades.

Round 1: No speed equalisation

Round 2: Speed equalised

Otherwise SBA.

 

[AstralKing7]

Giving it to Nate cause of his experience in weapons, he should be a master at stealth. Can use his surroundings to his advantage. Has great aim with guns. He seems to have some experience with swords and weapons also. Also if the battle takes place in a temple than Nate will use that to his advantage and find the traps in the temple and trick his opponets into them since he is a pro at exploring

 

[PowerPikachu2]

Doesn't Frank West have a weapon that takes a paddle, 2 chainsaws, and possibly duct tape? He could probably make that with what we're giving him.

 

[Jasonsith]

Doesn't Frank West have a weapon that takes a paddle, 2 chainsaws, and possibly duct tape? He could probably make that with what we're giving him.

Sure Frank can make any combo weapon he wants to and thinks fit. He can make a super long range sling hammer with the grenade/rock found in the temple and a grappling hook if he wishes. The real question is whether the weapon would be effective against someone who can win Lara Croft in standing long jump (and would lose to her in anything else).

Just a question of whether to give them a "Map of Angkor Wut with temple interiors" so that both can make weapons and set traps with their materials on hand and see if this would narrow or widen the difference.

(And after all, is this matchup a stomp at all.)

 

[Jasonsith]

bump

 

[Jasonsith]

Bump

 

[Jasonsith]

Bump

 

[Jasonsith]

Bump

 

[Jasonsith]

Bump

 

[Jasonsith]

Bump

 

[Jasonsith]

Bump

 

[Jasonsith]

bump it

 

[X_Squared]

Hmm, voting Nate for both rounds due to the fact Frank doesn't seem to have any of his hax or more powerful weapons, but I'll explain each in detail.

First Round: According to Frank's profile (since I admittedly don't have any knowledge on him myself), he is Superhuman in terms of speed at best. Meanwhile, Nate (despite what his profile says since it's lacking a lot of stuff) should be Supersonic at best since he has dodged gunfire plenty of times from assault rifles and such. He's also superior to the pirates and mercenaries in Uncharted 1, who were capable of dodging bullets as well. As for weapons, Frank can craft a deadly melee weapon, but Nate's speed and experience will allow him to stay clear of it. He seems to have much better experience with guns since he racks up the body count with any firearm he acquires on the battlefield and has great precision even when he's being dragged by a truck while holding on to his grappling hook, riding on a horse and even managing to kill two men faster than they could react while on his back after a car crash. He's even got superior skill in CQC if Uncharted 3 didn't make it apparent enough as he's defeated dozens of agents and mercenaries at once.

Second Round: Same reasoning as above excluding the part about speed.

 

[Ciruno_Fortes_(COB)]

Nate FRA, but not on the speed.