-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Naruto Ability Removal
- Thread starter RisingIons
- Start date
- Status
- 8,304
- 1,724
- 11,708
- 16,099
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
- 8,218
- 2,573
It used to be worse.
- 16,203
- 10,693
What
- 2,954
- 1,440
This is durability negation according to the VSB
"Immortality / Regeneration Negation: Many characters and weapons have the ability to ignore the immortality and regenerative abilities of their opponents, allowing them to kill characters with wounds they would otherwise survive. As with other powers, this is generally limited by the strongest level of regeneration and the types of immortality that the ability has nullified, and an ability may be limited to just immortality or just regeneration. Killing a character through means they can't survive even with their immortality doesn't count; killing someone who can regenerate from just a soul can just as easily be Soul"
All naruto is doing her is slowing Regen not negating it.
- 11,708
- 16,099
Which is precisely why it's limited...........
- 16,203
- 10,693
that's the reason that it is limited
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,204
- 4,041
up, that's why it's "limited"
- 1,581
- 1,174
Why is Saitama's lifting strength for his pre training key unknown? I find it weird, since he doesn't have any lifting feats for that time.
- 16,203
- 10,693
Thats the reason that its rated as Unknown
- 2,954
- 1,440
For it to be limited durability negation you have to temporally stop said regen not slow it
- 16,203
- 10,693
No, ''limited'' work in a lot of variable ways, a ''limited'' can be because it only is actived due some specific reason, or maybe because it only actives when the character has some age, or maybe because it slows down the regeneration, which is the case
- 1,581
- 1,174
I was just using Reio's logic as a joke.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,204
- 4,041
make a crt and change the site standards.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- 11,928
- 11,547
Yes and we don't do that for Bleach because **** Bleach. That's how it works. VSBW hates Bleach.
- 18,756
- 13,770
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,204
- 4,041
- 6,135
- 4,213
Since when did AP have anything to do with regen or regen neg?? Especially Low-godly at that.
Just because AP boost and ability to slow regen happen congruently doesn't mean they are same.
Heavily disagree with removal of Limited Regen Neg.
Just because AP boost and ability to slow regen happen congruently doesn't mean they are same.
Heavily disagree with removal of Limited Regen Neg.
- 18,756
- 13,770
From the disagree side... Can you show any scan to why it should be limited regeneration negation?
- 16,203
- 10,693
- 6,135
- 4,213
I am pretty sure it is provided above abundantly. Post no. 16 last para,
Slowing down regen is enough for limited regen neg.
Slowing down regen is enough for limited regen neg.
- 18,756
- 13,770
Just wanted to see if it does that
- 16,203
- 10,693
I sent the scan
- 8,304
- 1,724
- 18,756
- 13,770
Hmm
Fodder scan.
I disagree then
- 18,756
- 13,770
I disagree with the removing... but I feel like it should state something involving with chakra
- 16,203
- 10,693
there has difference in the scans?
Yomi_Schwarz
She/Her- 2,618
- 569
Kabuto says Naruto’s power slowed Mu’s regeneration, it didn’t outright negate it. You can get the sentence translated to see if it says “power” or “ability”, but if anything it’s only a property of that specific technique. Nothing about Naruto’s chakra or his other techniques used in the subsequent chapters replicated what we’ve seen in that panel.
- 16,998
- 12,134
This seems kinda vague to me, as from what I'm reading here the attack / mechanisms of this are never explored again or elaborated further upon. It also doesn't state to what attacks this is applicable to in Naruto's techniques and such, so at the very least the profile should elaborate on that much.
- 31,295
- 27,525
I've been asked to comment here again, but the only thing I can say is that I'm neutral about this.
Nobody else in the manga noted Naruto being particularly effective against Edo Tensei because of some unique power that he has or that Kurama has. By itself, Kabuto's statement is a bit strange.
The current non-official scan on his profile suggests that it is to do with raw might / power. But that could be an incorrect wording.
This current wording on the profile seems fine to me for what it is, even if the feat as a whole doesn't make sense. Maybe a note could be added to the profile that this is for a jutsu-based regeneration and he's not negating biological regeneration.
Nobody else in the manga noted Naruto being particularly effective against Edo Tensei because of some unique power that he has or that Kurama has. By itself, Kabuto's statement is a bit strange.
The current non-official scan on his profile suggests that it is to do with raw might / power. But that could be an incorrect wording.
This current wording on the profile seems fine to me for what it is, even if the feat as a whole doesn't make sense. Maybe a note could be added to the profile that this is for a jutsu-based regeneration and he's not negating biological regeneration.
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #77
That’s what I’m saying, it’s a one-time statement never brought up again anywhere. It makes little sense to say it’s through AP gaps when like M3X showed, bigger gaps have been displayed with no regeneration interference. The interpretation of the feat is based on opinion, not any tangible fact.
Regardless, the ability in question should be changed anyway. Power nullification is the ability to completely cancel out an ability. Naruto only slowed it, therefore the feat better qualifies for Power Modification.
- 5,420
- 1,068
I disagree. There have been many cases where Edo Tensei bodies have been impaired much more than this and are able to regenerate near-instantly. Naruto's "power" is vague, you can't draw the conclusion of it being AP when there is enough evidence to the contrary.
Limited Regeneration Negation is completely fine to have. It doesn't completely nullfiy the regeneration but slows it, hence the "limited".
Limited Regeneration Negation is completely fine to have. It doesn't completely nullfiy the regeneration but slows it, hence the "limited".
- 6,135
- 4,213
Cause=/=effect.
Whatever the reason maybe, we can't deny that result is regen slow.
Whatever the reason maybe, we can't deny that result is regen slow.
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #80
“Power Modification is the ability to alter, interfere with, or modify other powers.”
Fits the bill better to me. Nullification and reduction aren’t similar. Neutral with the feat itself.
I also agree with Damage’s suggestion “
Maybe a note could be added to the profile that this is for a jutsu-based regeneration and he's not negating biological regeneration.”
- Status
