-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
My wall of hax is bigger than yours ~ UKG vs. Lavos
- Thread starter The_Wright_Way
- Start date
- Status
- 7,681
- 996
Gretchen for Karu and SD argument.
- 63,529
- 8,506
And as Time Devourer, he probably still does
Also, UKG FRA
Also, UKG FRA
- 3,298
- 370
the real miracle is that Lavos even lost to begin with tbh.
UKG FRA
UKG FRA
- 40,470
- 12,953
We also don't see Kriemhild Gretchen actually fight, making it a rather big inequivalence. (Though doppel KG does use the arrows)
Yet not only does she have a massive powerset, but knows just what to do to win?
Its not just one showing. Ophelia has dupes and fire manip, Candeloro has thread manip, etc, etc. This is the equivalent of me asking if this Lavos should even have the hax of his other tabs.
Like Matt said to me in Doom vs Lavos, show the witches having the complex stuff rather than the simple stuff. Just because other witches had simple powers doesn't mean you can upscale that to CONCEPT MANIPULATION
And this is ignoring the fact that Ultimate Madoka isn't the reason UKG has that hax...
Other than her passive stuff and regen, prey tell, where does her other stuff come from?
Yet not only does she have a massive powerset, but knows just what to do to win?
Its not just one showing. Ophelia has dupes and fire manip, Candeloro has thread manip, etc, etc. This is the equivalent of me asking if this Lavos should even have the hax of his other tabs.
Like Matt said to me in Doom vs Lavos, show the witches having the complex stuff rather than the simple stuff. Just because other witches had simple powers doesn't mean you can upscale that to CONCEPT MANIPULATION
And this is ignoring the fact that Ultimate Madoka isn't the reason UKG has that hax...
Other than her passive stuff and regen, prey tell, where does her other stuff come from?
- 39,668
- 15,591
UKG FRA.
- 2,056
- 651
What exactly are the FRA's reffering to?
No ones given reasoning on how UKG would actually kill Lavos.
No ones given reasoning on how UKG would actually kill Lavos.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Via conceptual manipulation that was explicitly witch specific and Madokami's.
- 39,668
- 15,591
- 2,056
- 651
Veloxt1r0kore said:
- 14,195
- 2,574
She quite literally has info analysis and I'm 99% sure she is winning right now due to passive abilities, so not sure it even matters what she starts with first.
Complex Stuff? That may take a while but sure. Mind showing the same for Lavos?
From either doing it herself or from the other witches?...
"Via conceptual manipulation that was explicitly witch specific and Madokami's."
...As Madoka creates the concept of Wraiths to replace them and the fact that all "specific abilities" in PMMM are never shown to be specific. (Unless you want to argue Sayaka lacks regen, Kyoko lacks duplication, and Homura can only use time manip when Madoka is involved, etc)
That said, are any of these actually relevant to the vs thread and not just something that should be in the CRT?
Complex Stuff? That may take a while but sure. Mind showing the same for Lavos?
From either doing it herself or from the other witches?...
"Via conceptual manipulation that was explicitly witch specific and Madokami's."
...As Madoka creates the concept of Wraiths to replace them and the fact that all "specific abilities" in PMMM are never shown to be specific. (Unless you want to argue Sayaka lacks regen, Kyoko lacks duplication, and Homura can only use time manip when Madoka is involved, etc)
That said, are any of these actually relevant to the vs thread and not just something that should be in the CRT?
- 39,668
- 15,591
SD,answering Cal question about UKG problem thread.
- 39,668
- 15,591
Not necro enough Dodo,also grace is ended,this can be added now.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Yeah, one person can't keep this from being added. (I'm being serious, btw. Not sarcastic.)
- 39,668
- 15,591
Uuuhh.....mean? I'm confused here.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Meaning it's concluded, despite my wishes. I'm one person. If I disagree, doesn't change much.
- 39,668
- 15,591
Ah,alright then.
I will request Ever to close this since it's concluded.
I will request Ever to close this since it's concluded.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Oh, I know that Fate would vehemently disagree with this result, but he rather have Lavos lose to BoS Kid Goku than be brought back into another Lavos match. Not even kidding ovo.
- 7,681
- 996
>Not kidding.
>Put the "ovo" at the end.
Typical of Cal. :v
>Put the "ovo" at the end.
Typical of Cal. :v
- 39,668
- 15,591
Can you close this Cal?
- 39,668
- 15,591
Also Dragon will be surprised Lavos lose here. :v
- 40,470
- 12,953
Nah. I'm still hopeful that someone will come around and debunk ovo. Have Kal or SD do it.
(Nah, I got it ;_
Hakai
(Nah, I got it ;_
Hakai
- 7,681
- 996
Dragon will throw a party actually ovo.
- Status
Similar threads
