• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Misc Digimon Revisions VI

Ah, I see.

Anyway, I only have one grievance, and it's not major and doesn't affect the revision, because the feat is legit. It's just that I don't think Megadramon's feat was done by existing alone. Other than that, it's good.
 
It was more of his evolution, but still, him just being there was causing the destruction. Such is the Digital Hazard.
 
Sounds more like a tier 2 power source to me, like the Code Eve from Digi...I mean Poke....I mean Yo-kai...I mean, forget it. Bakugan. ovo

Like I said tho, doesn't matter. Feat is legit.
 
The real cal howard said:
Sounds more like a tier 2 power source to me, like the Code Eve from Digi...I mean Poke....I mean Yo-kai...I mean, forget it. Bakugan. ovo
Just went through all the monster hunters franchises. ovo
 
@Cal

I see your point, but Megidramon and Gallantmon are made of the substance too.

@Dragon. Theirs still Jade Coccoon and Dragon Quest Monsters. DQ Monsters is probably just as blatantly Tier 2 as Digimon now that I think about it.
 
So, we still have SGDL, RK, Olympos Xll, Tamers and Savers stuff to do.....Glad this'll be the last big Tier Revsion for awhile and we can focus on random abilities.
 
You're not the only one...

Y'know. I just realized something very simple. Saying "yes" and not being controversial makes everything go so much quicker.
 
The real cal howard said:
You're not the only one...
Y'know. I just realized something very simple. Saying "yes" and not being controversial makes everything go so much quicker.
....You don't say......
 
Your doubts are understandable and welcomed, it's not every series that goes from 6-B to Low 1-C in the span of months.
 
I should really just say yes to this, even if I disagree. Makes things much simpler if I'm gonna end up wrong anyway.

(And no, I'm not being bitter, or even trying to be. I'm stating facts. This just is more efficient ovo)
 
This is why I tell you to go back in the Pokemon stuff and maybe re-evaluate some feats and such.
 
Bruh, that's what I'm doing. Heck, Charizard had a durability ignoring move in the TCG, and several Pokémon have what Hades from Saint Seiya or what the SGDL have, but lighter and don't need to kill as much as defeat.
 
Dragonmasterxyz said:
So, we still have SGDL, RK, Olympos Xll, Tamers and Savers stuff to do.....Glad this'll be the last big Tier Revsion for awhile and we can focus on random abilities.
It wont be, tho. Now we must downgrade every infinite speed digimon from the Dark area according to the new rules.
 
How so? I thought it was clear that those who naturally live in a void are fine. That's what I was told.
 
Dark649 said:
For Celebi: According to the new rules travelling from the past to the future or the opposite, staying in areas without time or being born in them is not Infinite Speed, or Alien X would be as such.
this
 
Can someone actually link where that was discussed? No one I've talked to about it remembers the discussion at all, and everyone seemed to disagree with it. It worries me that it was just accepted without any actual discussion.
 
Yeah, we can't go around downgrading Pokemon, Digimon and other verses without seeing said discussion. I don't think we ever got a conclusion to the old one either. Everyone is on a different page here.
 
The real cal howard said:
Frankly, our rules for infinite/immeasurable are overly complicated and kinda shit.
I couldn't agree more. We largely use a single persons definition, which has never been fully eloberated on as far as I can tell. I think our old rules were the best, before we kept tampering with them because a few series like Toaru don't abide by our rules.
 
We had a discussion, but I vaguely remember it not concluding or most of us not agreeing or we said we'd worry about it another time. Frankly, I don't even know anymore.
 
To my knowledge this is still valid if the franchise in question addresses the need to move beyond time as necessary to move in the erased time. For example,erase the time was compared to the time stopped. And in Digimon this is what happens, from the point of view of beings outside the Dark Area the time stands still, moving in the Dark Area is like moving with time stopped.
 
Executor N0 said:
To my knowledge this is still valid if the franchise in question addresses the need to move beyond time as necessary to move in the erased time. For example,erase the time was compared to the time stopped. And in Digimon this is what happens, from the point of view of beings outside the Dark Area the time stands still, moving in the Dark Area is like moving with time stopped.
Yeah, but with the way these supposed rules are, it won't be treated like that anymore I guess? Like I said, at this point we don't know anymore.
 
Back
Top