• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Marvel_Champion_07

VS Battles
Retired
8,997
9,713

According to the Russos, Mjolnir would not be able to withstand the blast from all six Infinity Stones like Stormbreaker because it is not as powerful as the axe, which means:
  • Stormbreaker > Mjolnir
  • Stormbreaker overpowering the IG beam is AP and not hax
So Stormbreaker’s IG feat is applicable for AP justification and its “limited Power Nullification” should be removed
 
Last edited:
This seems to make sense, and it's way more consistent with what's actually shown on-screen in Infinity War. Nowhere in canon screen time was it shown that Eitri designed Stormbreaker to counteract the Infinity Gauntlet, especially since the Gauntlet was a new creation and Stormbreaker's plans had been around for centuries (likely far longer, if Love and Thunder is anything to go by) before this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top