-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mid-High to High Regenerationn
- Thread starter Callsign_Castle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- regeneration
- Status
- 10,502
- 11,574
...what are diatomic atoms? I assumed lone molecules in this context was supposed to mean as much as a low amount of separated molecules as opposed to a gathering making up a substance.
- 15,726
- 7,715
The early context was a single molecule.DontTalkDT said:
- 8,427
- 3,141
Wouldn't regenerating from "pure energy" be Low-Godly?
- 15,726
- 7,715
I think a molecular distinction and atomic distinctions should exist between Mid-High and High Regenerationn.
Regenerationn from a single molecule should be added Mid-High Regenerationn to create the distinction, in view.
Regenerationn from a single molecule should be added Mid-High Regenerationn to create the distinction, in view.
- 903
- 142
- Thread starter
- #51
We would also need to make a list of pages to be revised.
- 15,726
- 7,715
My issue is Regenerationn currently from unspecifed molecular level Regenerationn are being judged as High when the correct context is lone molecules or a single molecule.Antvasima said:
It would be safer, in my opinion, to make lone molecules a section part of Mid-High Regenerationn because Mid-high Regenerationn's definition that involed regenrration from reduced to ash, dust, smoke, or vapor involved Regenerationn from molecular changes.
- 903
- 142
- Thread starter
- #53
Vaporization+ should be classified as high. Arguably, DNA still had a chance of being recovered from ash, but I'm not sure if the wiki rates Regenerationn from molecules as DNA, or any molecule in general (like a molecule of water).
- 903
- 142
- Thread starter
- #55
Any more input?
- 903
- 142
- Thread starter
- #57
I'm trying to understand how we would rate vaporization based on definitions from science and definitions of Regenerationn here.
- 903
- 142
- Thread starter
- #59
I'll make a different thread, this can be closed.
- 1,640
- 238
How do we know if the rest of the matter is erased and not dispersed? It's ambiguous in most cases. A molecule of a compound is made out of two or more atoms. A molecule of H2 for example can be cooled down to solid or liquid state under right circumstances.DontTalkDT said:
The ability to regenerate from scattered or lone molecules this should be under Mid-High
The correct definition of High should be The ability to regenerate from scattered or lone atoms, subatomic particles, or even pure energy.
- 5,336
- 1,216
Bump
- 8,678
- 5,556
Looks fine to me.
- 8,821
- 9,405
Bruh.
- 6,590
- 1,700
Should being able to regen from pure energy consitutue for low godly since energy isn't physical particles?
- 6,590
- 1,700
The scientific definition sounds like it fits moreso than metaphysical. Why wouldn't it count again?Elizhaa said:
- 30,087
- 31,393
There is a big difference between atomization and vaporization. Vaporization is heating up a liquid or solid until it becomes a gas/vapor. Molecularization is where every single molecular particle in your body is completely separated. Same with atomization, it's where every single atom in your body is separated. Or someone can regenerate from a single atom or molecule. So in other words, I agree with @DontTalkDT
Also, there is such as thing as Ionization. Which is the middle road between vaporization and and have your molecules separated. Ionization is where where solid/liquid/gas becomes plasma. Regenerating from a body of plasma would also still be Mid-High as High is still regenerating from a single molecule, atom, ect.
Also, there is such as thing as Ionization. Which is the middle road between vaporization and and have your molecules separated. Ionization is where where solid/liquid/gas becomes plasma. Regenerating from a body of plasma would also still be Mid-High as High is still regenerating from a single molecule, atom, ect.
- 165,220
- 72,249
So, can somebody well-informed please summarise how exactly we should modify our Regenerationn requirements, and why?
Politely asking DontTalkDT to comment here again would probably also be a good idea.
Politely asking DontTalkDT to comment here again would probably also be a good idea.
- 10,748
- 6,476
I have a question, say we consider instances of characters recomposing themselves after turning into clouds of vapour mid-high Regen, will we then consider a character turning to vapour, that vapour completely dissipating in the air and then the character seemingly rematerialising out of nowhere in a completely different location also mid-high?
That situation feels like it would be different from if there are visible vapor trails that just come together to reconstitute the character
That situation feels like it would be different from if there are visible vapor trails that just come together to reconstitute the character
- 903
- 142
- Thread starter
- #79
The difference there would be the space between gas molecules which really only affect the speed of the Regenerationn, as well as the amount of molecules present.
I don't really know how many molecules would be needed to appear as a cloud versus appearing as invisible vapor, but I'm sure in either case it's a whole lot.
I don't really know how many molecules would be needed to appear as a cloud versus appearing as invisible vapor, but I'm sure in either case it's a whole lot.
- Status
