• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Medaka content revision.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kepekley23 said:
@Ant
I have performed the edits and removed Kumagawa's resistance to sealing. Tell me here if I did anything wrong.
Kumagawa's resistance to sealing is legitimate, he resisted to someone who was able to seal people inside cards.
 
Kepekley23 said:
@Ant

I have performed the edits and removed Kumagawa's resistance to sealing. Tell me here if I did anything wrong.
Resistance to sealing was "okay".
 
If firephoenix is okay, I think we are done with this thread
 
I didn't refer to the style user who sealed Najimi and Kumagawa, I referred to Kumagawa himself.
 
Anyway, thank you for the help Kepekley.
 
@Iapitus

I thought that Kepekley restored Kumagawa's resistance to sealing again. If not, you can fix it if you wish.
 
Kami95 said:
About Bookmaker's sealing I'm fine with whatever is decided, but it should be noted that Bookmaker was stated to be similar to Momozono's sealingtwice: 1, 2.
Well, maybe "possibly Sealing" for Bookmaker then?
 
Antvasima said:
Well, maybe "possibly Sealing" for Bookmaker then?
Adding "possibly Sealing" for a minus that's been stated like 50 times to be a seal and not a power null (such as Life Zero), in a verse where they differ?
 
A revision of the sealing page is for another thread, and more Reppuzan's area of expertise.

Anyway, how about "likely Sealing" for Bookmaker then?
 
Antvasima said:
A revision of the sealing page is for another thread, and more Reppuzan's area of expertise.
Anyway, how about "likely Sealing" for Bookmaker then?
Would that be accepted in vs threads doe? Also can't the "power null + sealing" be used, since it works like a power null a bit, but it is also called the same as a physical seal, and it did seal away Ajimu's existence?
 
@Matthew

No. Once somebody adds "likely Sealing", I think that we are done.
 
Okay. Thank you for the help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top