- 4,161
- 2,911
I said they used to be but were downgrade though
Not that they are
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
MCU Thor Storm Calcs
- Thread starter Marvel_Champion_07
- Start date
- Status
Not that they are
- 25,097
- 27,278
They were never 7-B+ tho. I never proposed 7-B+ for those 2.
- 4,161
- 2,911
Then someone just put thr wrong rating then ig
- 25,097
- 27,278
What?
- 8,997
- 9,718
- Thread starter
- #485
Sound good
- 4,161
- 2,911
Ok i make an typo here
Meant someone changed the tier long ago to City+ for some reason
Doesn't Matter now though i agree with dino that tehy should be City+
- 32,835
- 38,111
I think I found a way to find the thickness.
The thickness seems to be around the same size as the Jotunns.
Bad news is, it might nerf the feat and bring it down anywhere between Low 7-B to 7-B, depending on what height you wanna go with for the Jotunns (I do remember them being quite a bit taller than Thor, whose actor is 1.905 meters tall), assuming Grand Canyon times 100 size. Would nicely support the 200 petawatt laser tho
The thickness seems to be around the same size as the Jotunns.
Bad news is, it might nerf the feat and bring it down anywhere between Low 7-B to 7-B, depending on what height you wanna go with for the Jotunns (I do remember them being quite a bit taller than Thor, whose actor is 1.905 meters tall), assuming Grand Canyon times 100 size. Would nicely support the 200 petawatt laser tho
- 4,161
- 2,911
- 32,835
- 38,111
Seems about decent, since those guys are around half a body taller than Thor.
That case gives me like, 4.63 megatons. Which just so happens to be 10x lower than scaling to the 200 petawatt laser feat. 'Tis casual but what can you do.
But in case y'all haven't noticed, even with this I still fully support Thor scaling to busting Sokovia, as this was still mostly his own power, the vibranium would just repel it back, and Iron Man was only there to reduce the collateral damage by weird "atomic action doubling back" science bullshit. I honestly don't know how the **** on earth that downgrade went through.
Last edited:
- 8,997
- 9,718
- Thread starter
- #491
Weird, I got other values higher than 4.63 megatons
- 32,835
- 38,111
Well **** me I only did the normal Grand Canyon yield. My bad. Doing a Grand Canyon x100 yield now.
- 32,835
- 38,111
Baseline Grand canyon area: 277*18= 4986 square miles or 1.29137e+14 cm^2.
Grand Canyon Area Times 100: 4986*100= 498600 square miles or 1.29137e+16 cm^2
Grand Canyon Area With length and width being 100x bigger and then the two being multiplied: 27700*1800= 49860000 sq mi or 1.29137e+18 cm^2
Giants are 10 ft tall. 3.048 m
Low-end volume: 1.29137e+14*304.8= 3.9360958e+16 cm^3
Mid-end volume: 1.29137e+16*304.8= 3.9360958e+18 cm^3
High-end volume: 3.9360958e+20 cm^3
Calc:
Frag energy of ice is 0.525 J/cc
Low-end: 3.9360958e+16*0.525= 2.0664503e+16 J or 4.938934751434034709 megatons of TNT (Small City level+)
Mid-end: 3.9360958e+18*0.525= 2.0664503e+18 J or 493.89347514340346379 megatons of TNT (Mountain level)
High-end: 3.9360958e+20*0.525= 2.0664503e+20 J or 49.389347514340343537 gigatons of TNT (Island level) (WTF)
Me personally, I'mma stick with the Mid-end. High-end has an area ten thousand times larger than the base area. Which makes no sense.
Grand Canyon Area Times 100: 4986*100= 498600 square miles or 1.29137e+16 cm^2
Grand Canyon Area With length and width being 100x bigger and then the two being multiplied: 27700*1800= 49860000 sq mi or 1.29137e+18 cm^2
Giants are 10 ft tall. 3.048 m
Low-end volume: 1.29137e+14*304.8= 3.9360958e+16 cm^3
Mid-end volume: 1.29137e+16*304.8= 3.9360958e+18 cm^3
High-end volume: 3.9360958e+20 cm^3
Calc:
Frag energy of ice is 0.525 J/cc
Low-end: 3.9360958e+16*0.525= 2.0664503e+16 J or 4.938934751434034709 megatons of TNT (Small City level+)
Mid-end: 3.9360958e+18*0.525= 2.0664503e+18 J or 493.89347514340346379 megatons of TNT (Mountain level)
High-end: 3.9360958e+20*0.525= 2.0664503e+20 J or 49.389347514340343537 gigatons of TNT (Island level) (WTF)
Me personally, I'mma stick with the Mid-end. High-end has an area ten thousand times larger than the base area. Which makes no sense.
- 32,835
- 38,111
Actually, I have one last end to suggest, since the 27700*1800 time area is now bunk.
We know the Grand Canyon Area 100 time size to be 498600 sq miles or 1291368.07 square km.
Which means the Grand Canyon would have to be 10x longer (2770 miles is 4457.883 km) and wider (180 miles is 289.682 km) than the IRL thing to the area value.
I'll assume 2 ends. A 1 m displacement, and a 2 m displacement.
But, even if you assume that the area is a perfect square (1291368.07 squared is 1136.383769 km per side), you'd get the same Richter level results regardless of whether you used 4457.883 and 289.682 km as your length and width or 1136.383769 km as both your width, the results are same.
Assuming a 1 m displacement I get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.01, or 493.6377 megatons of TNT (Mountain level), which is shockingly similar to my mid-end frag value.
Assuming a 2 m displacement, you get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.21, which is roughly 984.936 megatons of TNT (Mountain level+)
At least we know the outlier stuff was a bunch of bullshit from the beginning. Good to know. Heh.
Now, might I suggest you kneel before me and my glorious purpose of restoring the heyday of 7-A MCU?
We know the Grand Canyon Area 100 time size to be 498600 sq miles or 1291368.07 square km.
Which means the Grand Canyon would have to be 10x longer (2770 miles is 4457.883 km) and wider (180 miles is 289.682 km) than the IRL thing to the area value.
I'll assume 2 ends. A 1 m displacement, and a 2 m displacement.
But, even if you assume that the area is a perfect square (1291368.07 squared is 1136.383769 km per side), you'd get the same Richter level results regardless of whether you used 4457.883 and 289.682 km as your length and width or 1136.383769 km as both your width, the results are same.
Assuming a 1 m displacement I get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.01, or 493.6377 megatons of TNT (Mountain level), which is shockingly similar to my mid-end frag value.
Assuming a 2 m displacement, you get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.21, which is roughly 984.936 megatons of TNT (Mountain level+)
At least we know the outlier stuff was a bunch of bullshit from the beginning. Good to know. Heh.
Now, might I suggest you kneel before me and my glorious purpose of restoring the heyday of 7-A MCU?
- 4,161
- 2,911
Mcu hulk and Thor vs ultimate hulk and Thor when
- 25,097
- 27,278
I slep. Don't wake me up until we use 4-C Pre Ragnarok Thor
- 4,161
- 2,911
- 39,691
- 15,627
Me an intellectual:8-A IRON MAN VS 8-A OPTIMUS PRIME
VS
8-A GENERAL GRIEVOUS
The Shipgirls from Azur Lane
And this guy too
And this guy too
Last edited:
Colonel_Krukov
🖖 Live long and prosper
He/HimVS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Image Helper
- 8,644
- 10,810
Last edited:
Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,102
- 4,535
Considering how how high that is we could get High 7-A back
- 32,835
- 38,111
Me personally, I'm fine with either of those earthquake values, though you could argue for a displacement of 3 meters based on the Jotunns' height
- 8,997
- 9,718
- Thread starter
- #503
Bump
- 25,097
- 27,278
I asked Kieran for evaluation. Let's hope this is quick
- 32,835
- 38,111
Of course, let's not forget that Spino has to do it too LEL, he is one of our MCU experts after all who just so happens to be a CGM.
- 25,097
- 27,278
MOUNTAIN LEVEL VER 3.5 WAS ACCEPTED OOOOOOOOOHHHH
- 32,835
- 38,111
7-A SOKOVIA BUSTING IS COMING BACK LESSSSSSSSSSSSGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
- 25,097
- 27,278
This can finally be closed :]
- 11,964
- 16,617
Nothing else to go over? If so I can close it.
- 25,097
- 27,278
I'm saving the 7-A upgrade for a CRT that's coming soon. But yeah, this can be closed
- 32,835
- 38,111
That's actually being handled in the MCU Iron Man CRT
- 4,161
- 2,911
What the crt is about?
The One where mk 6 gets upgraded to 8a?
- 25,097
- 27,278
- 4,161
- 2,911
Sokovia recalc
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 11,964
- 16,617
Alrighty then, I'll close this.
Congratulations on the upgrades fellas!
Congratulations on the upgrades fellas!
- Status
