- 4,158
- 2,911
I said they used to be but were downgrade thoughThey are only 7-B. Check the profiles
Not that they are
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said they used to be but were downgrade thoughThey are only 7-B. Check the profiles
Then someone just put thr wrong rating then igThey were never 7-B+ tho. I never proposed 7-B+ for those 2.
Sound goodConsidering that 200 petawatts (47.8 megatons) is very close to the midpoint of 7-B (53.15 megatons), should we consider slightly upgrading Leviathan durability to City level+, considering the lasers were so ineffective against them?
Ok i make an typo hereWhat?
I think I found a way to find the thickness.
The thickness seems to be around the same size as the Jotunns.
Bad news is, it might nerf the feat and bring it down anywhere between Low 7-B to 7-B, depending on what height you wanna go with for the Jotunns (I do remember them being quite a bit taller than Thor, whose actor is 1.905 meters tall), assuming Grand Canyon times 100 size. Would nicely support the 200 petawatt laser tho
Seems about decent, since those guys are around half a body taller than Thor.Nvm jsut looked on google "frost giant mcu height" they are about 10'
Weird, I got other values higher than 4.63 megatonsThat case gives me like, 4.63 megatons. Which just so happens to be 10x lower than scaling to the 200 petawatt laser feat. 'Tis casual but what can you do.
Well **** me I only did the normal Grand Canyon yield. My bad. Doing a Grand Canyon x100 yield now.Weird, I got other values higher than 4.63 megatons
Updated. ThxBaseline Grand canyon area: 277*18= 4986 square miles or 1.29137e+14 cm^2.
Grand Canyon Area Times 100: 4986*100= 498600 square miles or 1.29137e+16 cm^2
Grand Canyon Area With length and width being 100x bigger and then the two being multiplied: 27700*1800= 49860000 sq mi or 1.29137e+18 cm^2
Giants are 10 ft tall. 3.048 m
Low-end volume: 1.29137e+14*304.8= 3.9360958e+16 cm^3
Mid-end volume: 1.29137e+16*304.8= 3.9360958e+18 cm^3
High-end volume: 3.9360958e+20 cm^3
Calc:
Frag energy of ice is 0.525 J/cc
Low-end: 3.9360958e+16*0.525= 2.0664503e+16 J or 4.938934751434034709 megatons of TNT (Small City level+)
Mid-end: 3.9360958e+18*0.525= 2.0664503e+18 J or 493.89347514340346379 megatons of TNT (Mountain level)
High-end: 3.9360958e+20*0.525= 2.0664503e+20 J or 49.389347514340343537 gigatons of TNT (Island level) (WTF)
Me personally, I'mma stick with the Mid-end. High-end has an area ten thousand times larger than the base area. Which makes no sense.
Mcu hulk and Thor vs ultimate hulk and Thor whenActually, I have one last end to suggest, since the 27700*1800 time area is now bunk.
We know the Grand Canyon Area 100 time size to be 498600 sq miles or 1291368.07 square km.
Which means the Grand Canyon would have to be 10x longer (2770 miles is 4457.883 km) and wider (180 miles is 289.682 km) than the IRL thing to the area value.
I'll assume 2 ends. A 1 m displacement, and a 2 m displacement.
But, even if you assume that the area is a perfect square (1291368.07 squared is 1136.383769 km per side), you'd get the same Richter level results regardless of whether you used 4457.883 and 289.682 km as your length and width or 1136.383769 km as both your width, the results are same.
Assuming a 1 m displacement I get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.01, or 493.6377 megatons of TNT (Mountain level), which is shockingly similar to my mid-end frag value.
Assuming a 2 m displacement, you get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.21, which is roughly 984.936 megatons of TNT (Mountain level+)
At least we know the outlier stuff was a bunch of bullshit from the beginning. Good to know. Heh.
Now, might I suggest you kneel before me and my glorious purpose of restoring the heyday of 7-A MCU?
I slep. Don't wake me up until we use 4-C Pre Ragnarok ThorActually, I have one last end to suggest, since the 27700*1800 time area is now bunk.
We know the Grand Canyon Area 100 time size to be 498600 sq miles or 1291368.07 square km.
Which means the Grand Canyon would have to be 10x longer (2770 miles is 4457.883 km) and wider (180 miles is 289.682 km) than the IRL thing to the area value.
I'll assume 2 ends. A 1 m displacement, and a 2 m displacement.
But, even if you assume that the area is a perfect square (1291368.07 squared is 1136.383769 km per side), you'd get the same Richter level results regardless of whether you used 4457.883 and 289.682 km as your length and width or 1136.383769 km as both your width, the results are same.
Assuming a 1 m displacement I get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.01, or 493.6377 megatons of TNT (Mountain level), which is shockingly similar to my mid-end frag value.
Assuming a 2 m displacement, you get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.21, which is roughly 984.936 megatons of TNT (Mountain level+)
At least we know the outlier stuff was a bunch of bullshit from the beginning. Good to know. Heh.
Now, might I suggest you kneel before me and my glorious purpose of restoring the heyday of 7-A MCU?
That is downplay but continueI slep. Don't wake me up until we use 4-C Pre Ragnarok Thor
Me an intellectual:8-A IRON MAN VS 8-A OPTIMUS PRIME
VS
8-A GENERAL GRIEVOUS
Considering how how high that is we could get High 7-A backActually, I have one last end to suggest, since the 27700*1800 time area is now bunk.
We know the Grand Canyon Area 100 time size to be 498600 sq miles or 1291368.07 square km.
Which means the Grand Canyon would have to be 10x longer (2770 miles is 4457.883 km) and wider (180 miles is 289.682 km) than the IRL thing to the area value.
I'll assume 2 ends. A 1 m displacement, and a 2 m displacement.
But, even if you assume that the area is a perfect square (1291368.07 squared is 1136.383769 km per side), you'd get the same Richter level results regardless of whether you used 4457.883 and 289.682 km as your length and width or 1136.383769 km as both your width, the results are same.
Assuming a 1 m displacement I get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.01, or 493.6377 megatons of TNT (Mountain level), which is shockingly similar to my mid-end frag value.
Assuming a 2 m displacement, you get a Richter Scale magnitude value of 9.21, which is roughly 984.936 megatons of TNT (Mountain level+)
Me personally, I'm fine with either of those earthquake values, though you could argue for a displacement of 3 meters based on the Jotunns' heightConsidering how how high that is we could get High 7-A back
Of course, let's not forget that Spino has to do it too LEL, he is one of our MCU experts after all who just so happens to be a CGM.I asked Kieran for evaluation. Let's hope this is quick
7-A SOKOVIA BUSTING IS COMING BACK LESSSSSSSSSSSSGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMOUNTAIN LEVEL VER 3.5 WAS ACCEPTED OOOOOOOOOHHHH
Nothing else to go over? If so I can close it.This can finally be closed :]
I'm saving the 7-A upgrade for a CRT that's coming soon. But yeah, this can be closedNothing else to go over? If so I can close it.
That's actually being handled in the MCU Iron Man CRTI'm saving the 7-A upgrade for a CRT that's coming soon. But yeah, this can be closed
What the crt is about?That's actually being handled in the MCU Iron Man CRT
WhatThat's actually being handled in the MCU Iron Man CRT
What
Also can someone link me the 7-A sokovia calc