The current format already performs this because the Varies justification literally says that the power of the stone varies based on size lmao
Nothing to say then, the other points I said remain.
There is not one universal procedure on when to add notes to a page and when not to, so I don’t know why you’re acting like there is.
Yet there is a normal way we do things and clear reasons for when we don't. The reasons were already given.
If it really was unprofessional, like you claim, I’m pretty sure that the numerous people in this thread (like the two staff members that already accepted the changes) would’ve pointed it out.
Consider this less so related to the CRT and more so over the comment quoted.
You should reconsider if it was worth your time to have kept in mind and mentioned that piece of trivia. It doesn't matter that I'm the first to disagree with something over how others could have done it first, and how some weren't staff and some were. That is a bad logic to have and yet you're the one later saying that "It honestly seems like you’re trying to create an issue where there really isn’t one", you lacked the experience to know that it doesn't much matter how much people and staff may agree with something, it is perfectly possible for someone to come in and disagree. Heck I even kinda do this on a regular basis on CRTs where a bunch of abilities are added, noticing a good number of mistakes or well new abilities missed, people agree with things really, really fast, and faster so if there was already others agreeing to things. They are that influenceable, and speaking of which, in that sense it is cheap from your part to appeal to the agreement so far, we can all see it, and regardless of it I still made my comment, imagine if mention the agreement so far was more often done over comments that come to disagree, that would be unnecessay.
You say that the AP section should show how everything works, but the note on Thanos’ page is literally linked in his AP section. And even if it wasn’t, there is nothing wrong with putting a note to explain how something works, literally all you have to do is scroll down.
It doesn't need to have extra steps, it can and has to just do its job correctly.
It honestly seems like you’re trying to create an issue where there really isn’t one.
I see this as a lack of self-reflection, I can say the same to you. Please rewatch your first comment that replied to mine and reconsider why do you want to do things unlike we do things on the AP, I'm not the one who couldn't evaluate what you say to the point of understanding it and simply disagreeing and have to instead question it all for the reasoning behind.
It's called the Double Edged Sword on the Wiki but I suspect it's a misnomer or based on merchandising
Then we don't know if it has a name.
The problem there is Xandar is a planet so why would we be assuming it isn't comparable to the other planetary showing for the Power Stone? There's not much reason to say it's overwhelmingly smaller then the world Eson ravaged and Ronan even claims he'd burn Xandar to it's core.
The elaboration on Thanos sized foes is perfectly fine though
We do assume it is planet-sized, that would just point out how he needed to get to that planet to use the "full" power of the stone, which is back to back with Gamora's statement. Also I'm pretty sure that "burn Xandar to it's core" is more so poetic and over how the race living there will be no more, as they did say that the surface would be destroyed.
TBH I don't think we should base scaling off of What If?, we see Proxima's staff wound him there, the Zombie episode has him be turned but then Hulk just stonewalls a horde and there's probably tons of shit I need to find by actively watching
There should matter less, that's true. But there are still the only canon place where they fought and we otherwise just assume that, since they work for Thanos, they
should be far weaker.
(Also zombie Thanos was some BS at the last moment to look cool regardless of if it made sense and everything else shown on the stories show hold more water.)
I'd prefer the wording of "his 2014 self" but it's not that misleading; this is a Thanos who has none of the character development he did in IW and fights completely differently, much more brutally befitting a galactic warlord
2014 self works. I don't think the Thanos in IW we point out didn't have any meaningful character development for the purpose of its AP.
I'm unsure if that means outright intelligence rather then something else. We certainly never see Thanos be intelligent in the same way as Tony
It would be "in the same way" in a very limited way and self-contained.
I don't know of we should take the word of Thanos at face face when talking about his intelligence. He could easily be High balling himself, especially when he considers that he's the only one who's seen the truth of universe's crisis.
I believe it should be added while the wording notes how it is just his word, he's a madman but he did improve things in Gamora's planet, he was wrong on some things and right on others, if the comment he did to Tony isn't misleading that then it could be around as meaningful as it sounds.
If it's not added then that's fine too, that bit was something small.
It could also be a kind of "we're not so different" monologue since Tony also struggled all his life for his ideals and Thanos already has a great deal of respect for Tony.
Well, ideally such a trope is done when it makes sense to use it, other times it's thrown at random, like "I could have killed you every time wanted to". Thanos saying this could show a bit of his character, "Hi" "You know me?" "I'm considered smart among standard minds too".
