[MCU] Iron Man Unibeam

[RoTt35]

A guidebook states that the Unibeam is Iron Man's most powerful weapon, therefore it should be superior to his lasers, as they are 200 Petawatts or roughly 47.8 Megatons and the difference is only of 1.119×, I guess that the Unibeam could be upscaled to baseline 7-B+ (53.5 Megatons). Weakened Thor, who was holding back against Iron Man, easily tanked the Unibeam at 475% power, assuming its power was also amplified by that then it would be 7-A (53.5 × 4.75 = 254.125 Megatons), the only ones affected besides Weakened Thor would be Avenger Hulk, Abomination and the Hulkbuster. This shouldn't generate any inconsistencies with the Mark 46 since it is a noncombat armor plus it already has a statement for the power of its own Unibeam

Edit: As @Oscar pointed out, the Mark 8-45's arc reactor has an energy output 1000 times greater than the Mark 6-7's, therefore the AP of its Unibeam would be 6-C+ (53.5 Megatons × 1000 = 53.5 Gigatons)

 

[Marvel_Champion_07]

Agreed

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

This is fine.

 

[Maverick_Zero_X]

This should work.

 

[Dragonite007]

Downgrade, because just can vapo metal

 

[Eseseso]

Looks good!

 

[The_one_you_least_expect]

Looks fine

 

[Excellence616]

I agree

 

[Oscar]

It's Fine

 

[Oscar]

Just as a question, should the Unibeam thing also affect the key of the Mark 8-45? Since the reactor of those armors are 1000 more powerful than the one of the mark 6-7

 

[RoTt35]

Just as a question, should the Unibeam thing also affect the key of the Mark 8-45? Since the reactor of those armors are 1000 more powerful than the one of the mark 6-7

I missed that, I guess so and it shouldn't generate any inconsistencies since nobody scales from the Unibeam of the Mark 8-45, which would be 6-C+ (53.5 Megatons × 1000 = 53.5 Gigatons)

 

[Oscar]

6-C+ (53.5 Megatons × 1000 = 53.5 Gigatons)

HOLY SHIT

 

[RoTt35]

This is fine.

This should work.

I updated the OP with something new that I missed and @Oscar pointed out, is it still fine? Sorry for the inconvenience

 

[Maverick_Zero_X]

I updated the OP with something new that I missed and @Oscar pointed out, is it still fine? Sorry for the inconvenience

Yeah, still looks straightforward to me.

 

[Dinobot1996]

I'm not seeing any issues here.

 

[AguilaR202]

I missed that, I guess so and it shouldn't generate any inconsistencies since nobody scales from the Unibeam of the Mark 8-45, which would be 6-C+ (53.5 Megatons × 1000 = 53.5 Gigatons)

Wouldn’t the top tiers downscale to 1/10th of this given that the unibeam is established to just be 10 times stronger than a repulsor blast vs Bucky?

 

[RoTt35]

Wouldn’t the top tiers downscale to 1/10th of this given that the unibeam is established to just be 10 times stronger than a repulsor blast vs Bucky?

No, I already addressed that in the op, the Mark 46 is a noncombat armor therefore its Unibeam, like the armor in general, is far weaker compared to its predecessors

 

[Marvel_Champion_07]

I missed that, I guess so and it shouldn't generate any inconsistencies since nobody scales from the Unibeam of the Mark 8-45, which would be 6-C+ (53.5 Megatons × 1000 = 53.5 Gigatons)

Looks alright. Iron Man could have just one-shotted Hulk with a Unibeam rather than get the Hulkbuster

 

[RoTt35]

Iron Man could have just one-shotted Hulk with a Unibeam rather than get the Hulkbuster

Hadron Enforcer be like

 

[Kingofwolves999]

Nice upgrade to 7-A for the 7-B+ people.

 

[Kingofwolves999]

Shouldn’t Thanos be High 6-B for deflecting a Thor Lightning enhanced Mark 85 Iron Man’s Repulsor beams?

 

[Marvel_Champion_07]

Shouldn’t Thanos be High 6-B for deflecting a Thor Lightning enhanced Mark 85 Iron Man’s Repulsor beams?

That's for a different CRT, if anyone wants to make it

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Shouldn’t Thanos be High 6-B for deflecting a Thor Lightning enhanced Mark 85 Iron Man’s Repulsor beams?

It was his sword that took the damage not him.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

This was asked to be closed.