- 7,863
- 10,329
Seems to be from the yellow tendril things rather then the actual celestials, trueIn the scene some of the galaxies appear right at the feet of the Celestials, and well, galaxies larger than others exist
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems to be from the yellow tendril things rather then the actual celestials, trueIn the scene some of the galaxies appear right at the feet of the Celestials, and well, galaxies larger than others exist
We are already shown directly in the VFX video what galaxies were used. We should use those instead.They look like ring galaxies
Does this work?By the way, is it possible to calculate the size and mass of the galaxy sized sun to also have an LS upgrade?
If we aren't including smaller celestials like Tiamat, Ego, Eson or the two randoms from Omnipotence city, I guess just a 3-C change or whatever is fine.Celestials in the profile are the ones that Arishem himself describes as a general thing, not the other Celestials who aren't that big like Eson and Ego and whatnot.
I guess the smaller Celestials would be at least 4-C based on being able to create and move Stars (Since Arishem confirmed all the Celestials to be able to do so as it's their responsibility to keep the universe alive that way), or High 5-A at the very least given how their birth can lead to planets violently going boom.If we aren't including smaller celestials like Tiamat, Ego, Eson or the two randoms from Omnipotence city, I guess just a 3-C change or whatever is fine.
What’s wrong with the two celestials in omnipotent city getting 3-cIf we aren't including smaller celestials like Tiamat, Ego, Eson or the two randoms from Omnipotence city, I guess just a 3-C change or whatever is fine.
I still doubt this as a viable method as well tbh My point in what is simply say that in lore we know all celestials are born from planets like earth that have reached a certain level with population ***** ans burst out of the worlds they're born from destroying them moving on to create new stars and shit to continue the cycle of life even with these facts we still see even in Love and thunder can appear to be much smaller than whole planets that they're born from and seeing how we've seen them at different sizes they could very likely manipulate their size but even if not they still in lore all continue the cycle of life by creating stars and shit so size aside unless they're actually something like Ego who so far is the only Celestial who doesn't fit the mold then it shouldn't matter otherwiseI mean a varies rating could work depending on the size of the celestial maybe
They're not the size of galaxies.two celestials in omnipotent city getting 3-c
Celestials can change there size so this doesn’t matterThey're not the size of galaxies.
I guess that or like stellerRegarding the LS, what value should the Celestials have? Since they are able to create and displace galaxy sized suns, and possibly black holes of that size too, I guess Galactic would be fine?
Where is this stated btw?Celestials can change there size so this doesn’t matter
Not stated, shown. Arshiem and other celestials at a base line are planet sized yet we see them being as big as stars and galaxies or smaller. It’s pretty clear that they can alter there size considering the inconsistency’s in there appearanceWhere is this stated btw?
Its simple actually and we just missed it.It’s pretty clear that they can alter there size considering the inconsistency’s in there appearance
The sun for Omnipotence City and Gorr's planet were what I was referencing.when were those shown?
Gorr's planet is inconsistent as ****. One moment it's larger than Thor's ship and the next moment it's so large that we can't see any of the cast or the boat on it either.The sun for Omnipotence City and Gorr's planet were what I was referencing.
If we've seen vastly different sizes for celestial bodies in the MCU before, why are we assuming that the "galaxies" are the sizes of real galaxies?
Please say what stars we've seen like this and without trying to being up thor making stormbreakerWhat's wrong with my question? How do we know those are real galaxies around the Celestials if we have seen things like stars be far smaller than irl?
Thor one is this most obvious example and without it thats half the evidence for small stars gone if you count omnipotence city as the other example that aside though we've seen numerous other legit stars in the MCU and only have two examples of smaller ones even ignoring the fact the general universe of the MCU is still based off our own reality with our world's sciences being applicable and considered real in thr MCUDidn't someone literally just mention a star in Omnipotence City being way smaller than irl? And yeah, there's the "neutron star" that forged Stormbreaker, I don't get why that can't be mentioned.
We've rejected that scaling interpretation for years. He just made weird space dust.Odin creating stars,
Rejected it because there wasn't feats on that level or of that sort years ago, as far as I'm concerned its open for another look considering all the other star stuff gods have doneWe've rejected that scaling interpretation for years. He just made weird space dust.
There's still not any feats on that level. The closest stuff are things that aren't AP related or not a star fear in the first place.Rejected it because there wasn't feats on that level or of that sort years ago, as far as I'm concerned its open for another look considering all the other star stuff gods have done
I mean, we shouldn't. I was just making a joke, I didn't intend to seriously imply moon sized galaxies.Are we seriously arguing this just because two stars, a dying neutron star and the sun of a city full of different gods, are smaller than they are in RL?
Oh, sorry thenI mean, we shouldn't. I was just making a joke, I didn't intend to seriously imply moon sized galaxies.