We can use this argument to turn everything into a wiki policy thing.
Because people totally want to work on a verse that they have direct evidence can have any CRT vetoed if you don't like it
Nope. I have been extremely reasonable in several recent content revision threads regarding them, considering how much I disagreed at the start. I am referring to policy changes only, not regular content revisions, regardless of which forum they have been placed in.
Except that this is not what I have advocated for at all. I just wanted to put rules about veto rights regarding changes to our official standards, safeguards, rules, and conventions that we have had for many years down into writing, since it is absolutely crucial for me to not get completely overwhelmed.
The bolded part has never been a thing. Ever. Policy revisions involve official standards and rules for the general site as a whole. That's all well and good. Once you start branching into individual verses, though, you start approaching very dangerous territory.
If there's something you have not been reasonable about is the content revisions threads regarding these two verses. There is a DC Herald Thread on hold because you kept disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing and they had to stop and make a huge reply to answer everything. I'm sure you even got a report from it, but that's irrelevent given your position.
This is about official rule pages. That's it, not regular revisions.
I already stated repeatedly that I accepted the DC heralds revision after Emirp assembled much better evidence. It is on hold because Emirp hasn't had the time to continue with it yet.
It is an extremely significant policy change for an official rule page that would long-term spam us with extremely unreliable pages for minor characters. I do not understand why this would not qualify.
I am aware. But I don't agree with extending this to rules for specific verses, because that branches out beyond the scope of general wiki policy.
That seems like a good idea.
Thank you for at least understanding our concerns.
Yes and im sure that simillar rule could be made for every verse but its not the first time a rule is made for specific verses, there is still a "rule" to not try to scale kaguya to the size of her dimensions, and i think there was a rule for Bleach too if im not mistaken, those rules were made because the staff was tired of many CRT's arguing so a rule was created to make it easier. This is not so different, and overall Marvel and DC have so many characters that probably could multiply the size of the wiki pages by at least 2 times and this is not counting teams, items, civilizations ect.
Im not talking exacly about "small characters" mostly im talking about not popular verses or characters even if they are big deal like i said Huma torch, Namor and even Mar-Vell all of which had a lot of comics yetthey can be forgoten. Small verses have problems with Staff members sure but because they are small its much easier to maintain the scales and the votes from the knowledged members, butfor "small characters" from big verses like Marvel and DC its much harder some of those minor characters might end up messing with scaling for example a villain that fought spiderman once and then show up fighting Thor again, how are you gonna scale him without making something like Spiderman relative to Thor? This is obviosly an hyperbole to prove a point but eventhose "semi consistent" scaling might end up messing with multiple characters that are not supposed to be scaled like that. IT will be a mess to keep track of so many characters while its already hard to keep the current scalings from falling.
A good first step, but your fellow staff feel you aren't listening to em.
First, those are discussion rules about what topics can be raised, which are wholly divorced from editing rules for what profiles can be made. Second, I'm fairly certain I've eliminated that rule about Naruto recently.
vsbattles.fandom.com
It was but Pre-Crisis retconned it as an alternative universe.
The reason why those rules were made and this one is the same reduce workload which is my point.First, those are discussion rules about what topics can be raised, which are wholly divorced from editing rules for what profiles can be made. Second, I'm fairly certain I've eliminated that rule about Naruto recently.
Discussion Rules
VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...
Isn't there a character well known In the Flash's rogues gallery who's whole thing is anal predicting the flash?
I suppose that this may be an idea.
Sorry I totally forgot about this. I will discuss with some members off-site for a better wording, and then post the draft here for evaluation.
This is the current one:
This is my draft:
For comic characters from different timelines or universes or simply not related to the mainstream, I think they should follow regular rules and not adhere to these above. Such as Millerverse Batman.
Adjust your version to mines. The rest seems fine (Formatting/Language)
