- 7,095
- 3,855
Not anymore.Paulo.junior.969 said:No, it's not, theyre both High 4-C.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not anymore.Paulo.junior.969 said:No, it's not, theyre both High 4-C.
Yes, they are both High 4-C, just because Godzilla has a 3-A key, it doesn't mean his High 4-C forms disppeared, it's on his profile, read it.Apex PredatorX said:Not anymore.
Immortality type 6 doesn't change Mario can make the time travel, BUT unfortunetly for Mario, Godzilla can return to life in that way millons of times.Paulo.junior.969 said:Type 6 wouldn't help against Time Travel at all, but Mario really does not have defence against Soul hax, so, I think I'm changing my vote (again).
you're really mad don't you?The real cal howard said:Aight. Taking care of these arguments.
Immortality since birth: Proof? Mario could still kill his mother. And easily kill baby Godzilla millions of times over. Even adult Godzilla is 300+ times weaker.
Millions of souls: Proof that they can be used for revival?
Infinite cloning: Bull.
Possessing: Yeah. Because possessing someone who can become a ghost at will is sooo easy.
Finally, like I said wayyyy earlier, Godzilla has zero defense to being turned into gold.
TOAA and has no feats of resisting radiation, Godzilla stomps him, m8.Huesito88 said:In fact I wonder how many people in fiction have feats of resisting radiation let alone the amount Godzilla could give out
in GMK Godzilla was born with Immortality Type 6 and his millons of souls.The real cal howard said:I don't think he was born with Type 6 immortality and having a million souls. The others are fine.
Sealing souls isn't the same thing as like...dying.
Not how it works
Off-topic quotes.SomebodyData said:As long as the reasoning is correct, sure.
But considering whats happened with this thread, I would like to know what is the reasoning?
Godzilla fans were called wankers.SomebodyData said:As long as the reasoning is correct, sure.
But considering whats happened with this thread, I would like to know what is the reasoning?