• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Mario Speed Downgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree with Assaltwaffle in this case, and do not think that he has been disrespectful.
 
Anyway, I am fine with Assaltwaffle's new definition, and would like to add it. It might be best to reopen the other thread and post the suggestion there for further staff input first though.
 
@Ant

I didn't say he was. I just didn't appreciate it. Doesn't matter.....in the end, the conditions for infinite speed makes no sense......at all.
 
Existing in a place where time itself doesn't exist...doesn't prove timelessness?

...What? No, seriously. No offense, but that's like saying existing in a place without the concept of bananas doesn't prove you can exist without bananas.
 
Well, we are currently talking about that the void should be explicitly described or shown as genuinely timeless for it to count as such.
 
I understand. One can believe certain void feats tend to be PIS or outlierish, but denying that they make your speed infinite is a no-no.
 
Kepekley23 said:
I understand. One can believe certain void feats tend to be PIS or outlierish, but denying that they make your speed infinite is a no-no.
I mean existing in a place that, by definition, doesn't exist, is completely illogical and impossible. Yet we pick out the logical conclusion that being without time in such a void is possible and give infinite speed.
 
A void being timeless doesn't make it non-existent.

Besides, it isn't illogical. We use paraconsistent logic for contradictory and paradoxical feats.
 
Again with this paraconsistent garbage. Paraconsistency violates everything that classical logic presents and how the world works.
 
Except the basis of paraconsistent logic stems from Aristotle.

You desperately need to stop treating philosophy like science or astronomy, where there are 100% unanimously factual theories like Evolution and the Big Bang. Doesn't work like that in philosophy.
 
Philosophy was the original science it should be noted as even Physics, Chemistry, and other sciences originated as theories before they were even proven facts. But I agree with Matt and Kep regarding the topic.
 
It seems whether they should be downgraded is quite controversial. Should a staff-only thread be made or is this thread sufficient?
 
^^What the others said.

No offense, but I think Assalt is making Philosophy-based assumptions that have nothing to do with this. Philosophy cannot be upplied to these contexts, at all.

Mainly because it is generally a way to see things from a "spiritual" and "mental" point of view. Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, consciousness, balance and language. Philosophical methods include questioning, critical discussion, rational arguments, and systematic presentation. Classic philosophical questions include: Is it possible to know anything and to prove it? What is most real? Philosophers also pose more practical and concrete questions such as: Is there a best way to live? Is it better to be just or unjust (if one can get away with it)? Do humans have free will?

Just to make some examples. It has nothing to do with this and cannot be used as an argument against DRB's one, at all.
 
Well, as far as I understand, Assaltwaffle was mainly arguing for that any Low 2-C character and above should not gain automatic infinite speed, due to being able to destroy universal space-time, and that Dimentio's speed rating may rely on an unproven assumption.
 
Well, I do agree with Assalt on that concept. Having a 4-D degree of power does Not automatically grant Infinite speed yes. And simply moving inside a timeless void is generally considered hax rather than speed yes. But if a character is by lore described as being one with the void; or basically semi-omnipresent within the void, that's usually infinite speed Same with literally merging with the void. IIRC, the Chaos Heart does specifically say that whoever possesses it becomes one with the void; which does sounds like merging with the void if you ask me.
 
I do not properly remember the conclusions here.
 
The conclusions were:

  1. Dimentio's infinite speed stat and anyone who scales to it is removed
  2. It is then replaced with Sub-Relativistic movement speed and Massively FTL+ Reactions and combat speed.
 
Okay, and what are the justifications for the new speed statistics?
 
Actually they should be comparable in Speed to Antasma and Dreamy Bowser without the Sub-Relativistic via powerscaling.
 
Okay. Which pages should I unlock for you to edit?
 
Alright. Thank you for the help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top