• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Maou Gakuin Discussion Thread

I have some questions about the plot manipulation in MGK and Castelvania.
I decided to take a look at the latest Plot Hax thread for MGK and Plot Hax for Castelvania, and realized it's basically the same thing (just changing that one controls destiny with a book and the other the past).

-Both have one of the possible uses;
-Both affect their respective universes through a book;

The real difference between the two, and just the possible uses, while the book of Castelvania affects the future, writing a "horrible end" for the victim, affecting both the book and the Real World, the book of traces MGK's affects the past, altering events from the past, affecting both the book and the Real World. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, in Castelvania's review of Plot Manipulation, the fact that there is already a being that is destiny itself was used as "supporting evidence", and therefore it couldn't just be manipulation of destiny by the book , although in MGK there is a being that controls causality, so by logic, it couldn't just be "manipulating causality with a book" either.

So Plot Manipulation was just rejected out of injustice (literally almost everyone, with the exception of MGK's supporters, were people who constantly disagree with MGK's CRTS)?

The fact that certain people who rejected MGK's CRT accepted Castelvania's Plot Manipulation revision with just a Scan saying that writing in the book also affects the universe, a Scan that apparently makes the book and the universe "equal", and a Scan showing the book affecting reality, it just seems like a hater on MGK 😐
 
Dog3352 said:
I have some questions about the plot manipulation in MGK and Castelvania.
I decided to take a look at the latest Plot Hax thread for MGK and Plot Hax for Castelvania, and realized it's basically the same thing (just changing that one controls destiny with a book and the other the past).

-Both have one of the possible uses;
-Both affect their respective universes through a book;

The real difference between the two, and just the possible uses, while the book of Castelvania affects the future, writing a "horrible end" for the victim, affecting both the book and the Real World, the book of traces MGK's affects the past, altering events from the past, affecting both the book and the Real World. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, in Castelvania's review of Plot Manipulation, the fact that there is already a being that is destiny itself was used as "supporting evidence", and therefore it couldn't just be manipulation of destiny by the book , although in MGK there is a being that controls causality, so by logic, it couldn't just be "manipulating causality with a book" either.

So Plot Manipulation was just rejected out of injustice (literally almost everyone, with the exception of MGK's supporters, were people who constantly disagree with MGK's CRTS)?

The fact that certain people who rejected MGK's CRT accepted Castelvania's Plot Manipulation revision with just a Scan saying that writing in the book also affects the universe, a Scan that apparently makes the book and the universe "equal", and a Scan showing the book affecting reality, it just seems like a hater on MGK 😐
Click to expand...
:worried~1:
:quedijo~1:
:FrogMmm~1:


Is bro trying to start a war in peaceful days?
 
Dog3352 said:
I have some questions about the plot manipulation in MGK and Castelvania.
I decided to take a look at the latest Plot Hax thread for MGK and Plot Hax for Castelvania, and realized it's basically the same thing (just changing that one controls destiny with a book and the other the past).

-Both have one of the possible uses;
-Both affect their respective universes through a book;

The real difference between the two, and just the possible uses, while the book of Castelvania affects the future, writing a "horrible end" for the victim, affecting both the book and the Real World, the book of traces MGK's affects the past, altering events from the past, affecting both the book and the Real World. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, in Castelvania's review of Plot Manipulation, the fact that there is already a being that is destiny itself was used as "supporting evidence", and therefore it couldn't just be manipulation of destiny by the book , although in MGK there is a being that controls causality, so by logic, it couldn't just be "manipulating causality with a book" either.

So Plot Manipulation was just rejected out of injustice (literally almost everyone, with the exception of MGK's supporters, were people who constantly disagree with MGK's CRTS)?

The fact that certain people who rejected MGK's CRT accepted Castelvania's Plot Manipulation revision with just a Scan saying that writing in the book also affects the universe, a Scan that apparently makes the book and the universe "equal", and a Scan showing the book affecting reality, it just seems like a hater on MGK 😐
Click to expand...
Book of traces can change the past? I though it was a book with all data of Miltia world
 
Dog3352 said:
I have some questions about the plot manipulation in MGK and Castelvania.
I decided to take a look at the latest Plot Hax thread for MGK and Plot Hax for Castelvania, and realized it's basically the same thing (just changing that one controls destiny with a book and the other the past).

-Both have one of the possible uses;
-Both affect their respective universes through a book;

The real difference between the two, and just the possible uses, while the book of Castelvania affects the future, writing a "horrible end" for the victim, affecting both the book and the Real World, the book of traces MGK's affects the past, altering events from the past, affecting both the book and the Real World. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, in Castelvania's review of Plot Manipulation, the fact that there is already a being that is destiny itself was used as "supporting evidence", and therefore it couldn't just be manipulation of destiny by the book , although in MGK there is a being that controls causality, so by logic, it couldn't just be "manipulating causality with a book" either.

So Plot Manipulation was just rejected out of injustice (literally almost everyone, with the exception of MGK's supporters, were people who constantly disagree with MGK's CRTS)?

The fact that certain people who rejected MGK's CRT accepted Castelvania's Plot Manipulation revision with just a Scan saying that writing in the book also affects the universe, a Scan that apparently makes the book and the universe "equal", and a Scan showing the book affecting reality, it just seems like a hater on MGK 😐
Click to expand...
imma bonk you
 
ElPapucho80 said:
When Graham changed that event in vol 8, He change the whole Miltia timeline? I thought it was only the book
Click to expand...
Graham changed the event recorded by the book (the past) but it didn't affect the timeline because the Gods keep the past as the past. It's not something that can be changed unless you're a certain weapon named Venuzdonoa (probably Anos Eyes too)
 
Tatsumi504 said:
Graham changed the event recorded by the book (the past) but it didn't affect the timeline because the Gods keep the past as the past. It's not something that can be changed unless you're a certain weapon named Venuzdonoa (probably Anos Eyes too)
Click to expand...
Well ... Chaotic Eyes stomps order. Maybe it changes the past if is neccesary as a logical contradiction?

Also, Any date about next upgrade? (vol 6) Would be nice to read the future threads of Misfit 🧐
 
Where can I read the English translation of the web novel of the Maou Gakuin no Futekigousha series? (I know the translations are filthy but I want to read them
 
Blackdragonq1 said:
Where can I read the English translation of the web novel of the Maou Gakuin no Futekigousha series? (I know the translations are filthy but I want to read them
Click to expand...
fanstranslations.com

The Misfit of Demon King Academy – Novel

After 2000 years has passed, the ruthless demon lord has just been reincarnated! But his aptitude at an academy for nurturing candidates for demon lords is, “Inept”!? Having the capability to destroy humans, elementals, and gods, after a long period of countless wars and strife, Arnos the demon...
fanstranslations.com fanstranslations.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
Maou Gakuin LN, WN and/or Anime & Key Problem
Replies
1
Views
1K
Dog3352
Dog3352
Blackdragonq1
Question about MGF
Replies
4
Views
1K
Blackdragonq1
Blackdragonq1
Guileal
Anos Voldigoad Immortality Type 6 removal
Replies
29
Views
3K
Tatsumi504
Tatsumi504
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
  • Locked
Additions for Anos Voldigoad
Replies
7
Views
3K
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
Daoist_Pepe
Top Tier Providence Discussion Thread
Replies
3
Views
544
Daoist_Pepe
Daoist_Pepe
Back
Top