- 11,335
- 19,845
Neither am, we have enough staff approval and the statement refers to Anything in all of existence so everything in verse.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Maou: Anos profile fix.
- Thread starter Reiner04
- Start date
- Status
- 3,229
- 3,560
Yeah, I'm with Dereck on this one.
- 11,335
- 19,845
- 9,982
- 10,821
- Thread starter
- #84
Oh man, I just took a nap and we got Infinite power to goku arguement already. Anyway, it's just a false equivalence, as this is not even a "Infinite" but "no matter how infinite" which would obviously includes current biggest size in Infinite that is present in the verse with "Destroying All things in existence" like statement this is absolutely L2-C. Now please excuse me.
- 9,982
- 10,821
- Thread starter
- #85
We already have accepted bigger than Infinite to be uncountable Infinite long ago, ben 10 is there already, we don't need statements regarding it, it's illogical af to go with Low ball just for the sake of Low-ball when evidences are clear af, there is no such thing as bigger than Infinite while still being countable Infinite. "No matter how Infinite" already confirms that there is more than "one Infinite" that involved and it'll scale to highest interpretation in terms to size in the verse unless proven otherwise which is L2-C further supported by whatever in existence, etc. So I don't know how it's a argument.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Actually yall arguments ain't working.
We only assume the lowest ball, which infinite structure is high 3-A but since the all of existence is also included, it's not even illogical to assume it mean universe.
(Planet one is the most illogical in this context if Anos literally displayed feats outside of its scope)
We only assume the lowest ball, which infinite structure is high 3-A but since the all of existence is also included, it's not even illogical to assume it mean universe.
(Planet one is the most illogical in this context if Anos literally displayed feats outside of its scope)
- 9,982
- 10,821
- Thread starter
- #87
Well, both statements equally qualifies for solid L2-C as for current accepted cosmology, it destroyers anything no matter "how Infinite that is", this statement won't make sense if there is just countable Infinite in the verse as all of them are equal in size, so we are forced to look if there is another Infinite structure even bigger than that in the verse, and we see L2-C structure, the biggest Infinite structure present in the verse and funnily second biggest.
"Whatever in existence" is just a supportive evidence, also even in Statements like this we go with highest interpretation in the verse unless proven otherwise or there is anti feat.
- 9,982
- 10,821
- Thread starter
- #88
Mayhaps, your mom?
Aachintya is trolling for that thread of yours he ain't serious. So nvm him.
- 2,127
- 1,726
Fair. I agree with your premise.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,251
- 14,623
Well, i just drop my opinion, but if the majority and staffs agreed with solid Low 2-C then no problem on my side
- 42
- 33
It can destroy everything in creation no matter how infinite it is and exists on a par with the order of creation. Low 2C should work I agree.
Completely agree with Space-Time Manipulation.
- 10,961
- 19,139
If Anus's sword can interact with the fundamental structures which construct a universe, such as the matter within it and its space-time continuum, and his range of destruction is infinite in scope, than the conclusion of Anus's sword being capable of destroying a universe entirely is a completely fine conclusion to have.
Styrm hyperfocusing on the semantical difference of "in vs of" doesn't address the fact "infinite" in this instance references scope, if his effective range with his sword is infinite, and his sword can interact with all those structures stated above, than he can most likely destroy that universe entirely, acting like the statement saying "in" addresses this conclusion is just wrong.
Styrm hyperfocusing on the semantical difference of "in vs of" doesn't address the fact "infinite" in this instance references scope, if his effective range with his sword is infinite, and his sword can interact with all those structures stated above, than he can most likely destroy that universe entirely, acting like the statement saying "in" addresses this conclusion is just wrong.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,122
We never accepted this. Don't talk with your own comments, just say what DT said. It was different in damn Ben10. Since this situation is accepted in one verse, it cannot be said to be applied in other verses.
DT said that it is not enough for Low2-C to see a 3D structure as an infinitesimal point and that larger structures including an infinite 3D structure can also be 3D. In short, your statement that "there is nothing greater than infinity, this is uncountable infinite" actually contradicts mathematics.
The reason for this can be compared to the fact that the natural numbers still have the same sets and have countably infinity larger than each other.
Obviously it's okay to be Low 2-C as it scales to cosmology. But if you are trying to make Low 2-C with this logic that is a big problem.
- 9,982
- 10,821
- Thread starter
- #95
Okay.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,122
Like I said, if you have a statement to support it and that's why you're doing it, yes, that's fine. But the logic you just said was clarified by DT and he said it's still 3D.
- 31,466
- 34,329
Looks alright to me.
- 3,493
- 5,191
I agree as well
- 18,393
- 14,323
48 hours are passed now, I assume it's safe to apply the changes.
@Reiner if you don't know how to add changes, ask @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
@Reiner if you don't know how to add changes, ask @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
- 11,335
- 19,845
Me when the flow of time has been altered
- 9,982
- 10,821
- Thread starter
- #102
Time Manipulation for mgk supporters fr.
- Status
Similar threads
