Low 2-C, 2-C, 2-B, 2-A Proposal/Revision?

[manu_zarri]

as you proposed the Low 2-C / 2-C / 2-B and 2-A rankings is truly unacceptable, not only is it reductant and merely explaining nothing about other possible rankings (destroying a 4D spatial dimensions for example), but it's written in too simple language, and I, personally, can't see it in our wiki, the only thing you can change is adding (also called timelines) next to space times, but it's unnecessary

 

[BoomBoomMan535]

as you proposed the Low 2-C / 2-C / 2-B and 2-A rankings is truly unacceptable, not only is it reductant and merely explaining nothing about other possible rankings (destroying a 4D spatial dimensions for example), but it's written in too simple language, and I, personally, can't see it in our wiki, the only thing you can change is adding (also called timelines) next to space times, but it's unnecessary

Simple language shouldn't be viewed in such a negative manner. In fact some people would prefer to be given simpler explanations. I'm fine with just simply adding timelines next to space-time continuums or at least a footnote saying that a destroying a space-time continuum means you're destroying a timeline/past, present, and future.

 

[manu_zarri]

Simple language shouldn't be viewed in such a negative manner. In fact some people would prefer to be given simpler explanations. I'm fine with just simply adding timelines next to space-time continuums or at least a footnote saying that a destroying a space-time continuum means you're destroying a timeline/past, present, and future.

So the definition would be

Low 2-C | Universe level+: Characters who are capable of significantly affecting[1], creating and/or destroying an area of space that is qualitatively larger than an infinitely-sized 3-dimensional space. Common fictional examples of spaces representing such sizes are space-time continuums of a universal scale, those space-time continuums are usually called timelines. However, it can be more generally fulfilled by any 4-dimensional space that is either:

if it is, then i don't have any problem

 

[BoomBoomMan535]

Y

So the definition would be

Low 2-C | Universe level+: Characters who are capable of significantly affecting[1], creating and/or destroying an area of space that is qualitatively larger than an infinitely-sized 3-dimensional space. Common fictional examples of spaces representing such sizes are space-time continuums of a universal scale, those space-time continuums are usually called timelines. However, it can be more generally fulfilled by any 4-dimensional space that is either:

if it is, then i don't have any problem

Yes thank you that's exactly what I was going for

 

[BoomBoomMan535]

Bump

 

[My_area]

Space and time continums are timelines which is combination of past,present and future so destroying space and time continum would be equal to destroying all of past,present and future of a timeline so I believe that should be obvious

 

[manu_zarri]

Space and time continums are timelines which is combination of past,present and future so destroying space and time continum would be equal to destroying all of past,present and future of a timeline so I believe that should be obvious

we know, the problem is that new users don't know (and obviously can't click) what is a space-time. so that's why he proposed that

 

[My_area]

we know, the problem is that new users don't know (and obviously can't click) what is a space-time. so that's why he proposed that

Well..then they should search what space and time continum is..its even given in form of link.Cant baby the users that much can we?

 

[manu_zarri]

Well..then they should search what space and time continum is..its even given in form of link.Cant baby the users that much can we?

the problem is that they don't think that it would help them with their question.

even I had this problem, i resolved it with passing time on the wiki and learning new stuff

 

[My_area]

Thats what they should do or search it in wikipedia,because the explanation for Low 2-C is far more clear and better than how it was in the past.Even the link for space and time continum is given.Now we cant just go and tell what space and time continum is can we? It should be generally understood if not then it should be researched.It shouldn't be so hard to figure out

 

[manu_zarri]

Thats what they should do or search it in wikipedia,because the explanation for Low 2-C is far more clear and better than how it was in the past.Even the link for space and time continum is given.Now we cant just go and tell what space and time continum is can we? It should be generally understood if not then it should be researched.It shouldn't be so hard to figure out

I know, but the OP wanted to help those people, i just proposed a better way than reformulate the entire tier 2.

 

[My_area]

I suppose 1 space and time continum being explicitly mentioned can be helpful but I still dont really see the point of confusion when everything for Low 2-C is listed out and link for space and time continum is given.It cant be more clear without spoonfeeding everything now

 

[manu_zarri]

I suppose 1 space and time continum being explicitly mentioned can be helpful but I still dont really see the point of confusion when everything for Low 2-C is listed out and link for space and time continum is given.It cant be more clear without spoonfeeding everything now

basically yes

 

[BoomBoomMan535]

Bump

 

[BoomBoomMan535]

Bump

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

I don't there's any point to this, no one seems to agree afaik, this should be closed if that's the case

 

[My_area]

Manu Zarri seems to agree to this..

 

[manu_zarri]

Manu Zarri seems to agree to this..

not really, just proposed a point

 

[My_area]

not really, just proposed a point

Seems to propose a point which is what BoomBoomman53 wanted so I will take it as agreement

 

[manu_zarri]

Seems to propose a point which is what BoomBoomman53 wanted so I will take it as agreement

would be more specifc put me in neutral

 

[My_area]

Okay
Same here