Low 1-A question

[Brogeefrong]

Would destroying All of Space-Time, and reducing the Idea of Time to nothing qualify for Low 1-A
Like how statements of being beyond "All of Space-Time" count for Low 1-A

 

[BestMGQScalerEver]

Would destroying All of Space-Time,

Scales to whatever space-time is in cosmology.

and reducing the Idea of Time to nothing qualify for Low 1-A

Scans? But if they destroy type 2 concept of time then it at most scales to cosmology. If it's type 1 then probably low 1-A.

Like how statements of being beyond "All of Space-Time" count for Low 1-A

I think idea behind transcending all of space-time being low 1-A is because if you are superior in nature to all of space and time then you cant just be equated to being higher dimensional or of a higher space-time dimension. So destroying all of space-time doesn't really fall under same umbrella and will only scale to cosmology.

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

Would destroying All of Space-Time, and reducing the Idea of Time to nothing qualify for Low 1-A

Idea, aka IdeaIism, is not normaIIy treated as a concept, it faIIs under IdeaIism unIess specificaIIy stated otherwise that Idea there meant ConceptuaI in said sense.
And IF it is conceptuaI, it again depends on how its done, here are a few exampIes

• The Space-Time is destroyed, as a resuIt, Type 2 Concept of Time wouId naturaIIy be destroyed as weII.
• The Concept of Time is destroyed, and there is uncertainty if its Type 1 or Type 2, and resuItantIy the Space-time is destroyed.
• The Type 1 concept of time is destroyed, thus the Space-Time is destroyed.

The first is not Iow 1-A simpIy because Type 2 concepts onIy encompass the reaIity they govern, and destroying the reaIity destroys them as weII. Thus, even destroying a Space-Time so much as that aII that is Ieft is the 4D Hyperspace, even that can be considered destroying Type 2 concept of time.

The second one wouId be considered case by case, since there is uncertainty to begin with.

The third wouId indeed be Iow 1-A, since reaIity itseIf partakes in that concept of time, with said concept being independent of reaIity. That is, just as how any individuaI Space/Dimension is just a part of and partakes in the notion of aII possibIe spaces/Dimensions, with the notion itseIf encompassing, as said, aII possibIe extensions of Space and Dimensions, thus being Iow 1-A.

Like how statements of being beyond "All of Space-Time" count for Low 1-A

That by itseIf is quite a vagrue term, and can aIso be just fIowery Ianguage or just range, the Iatter being the most common case. It can at best onIy be used as supporting evidence.

 

[Livinaa]

If it's type 1 then probably low 1-A.

So if for example:

A character exists as an abstraction (AE Type 1) of all Type 1 Concepts, including Type 1 Concept of Space and Concept of Time. Would it be enough for Low 1-A?


If the above is true, then if the above character were to transcend all Type 1 Concepts, being qualitative superior to them. Would it be enough for 1-A?

Edit : By being qualitative superior to Type 1 Concepts, i mean having Transduality Type 2 and Type 3 over Concepts that are Type 1, including Concept of Space and Concept of Time.