Location, location, location!

[Landon_Avery]

The location of a battle is one the most important aspects in determining who will win, and there are many placeses though out fiction to have a fight. However not many people don't really take into acount the location in which the combatents go at it, likely because not many people know anything about the locatoin outside of the obvious. As such I would like to propose an idea that would solve this problem.

Location Profiles...please bare with me. Adding this to the wiki would allow for more in depth discussions and arguments, and create a more level playing feild for certain matchs.

These profiles would include the name of the location, the terrain, weather, inhabatance, hazards, as well as other notable featers and for certain locations different points in time. An example of one of these profile would be something like this.


Location: Emerald Forest

Terrain Type: Forest

Wether: Sunny

Inhabatance: The Emerald Forest is home to varios types of grimm, mainly Beowolfs and Ursa's

Hazards: The Creatures of Grimm

Notable Featers: None


But hey, it's just an idea...what do you think?

 

[MrKingOfNegativity]

I actually somewhat support this, or at least what it sounds like on paper.

That said, people are probably never going to apply this to whatever debate threads they make. Not only does it add complications to the matches themselves and we all know that people like their matches as simple as possible, but specifying a location is already technically an option. The members here simply refuse to make use of it.

Moreover, we already have a lot of work on our hands in terms of the profiles we do have. Adding "Location" profiles to the mix is just going to make for more things we have to maintain.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

Sorry, but this isn't feasible. Battles already have a ton of variables. The variety of hax the characters have, AP/Dura, Speed (if it isn't equal), stamina, intelligence, versatility, the list goes on. We really can't have different terrains adding into the mix, especially not terrains with multiple pre-determined attributes and hazards.

Once again, I'm sorry, but this isn't going to happen. If you want me to leave this open as a "what if" thread, I can do that and move it to fun and games. Otherwise I will close this within 24 hours.

 

[Antvasima]

I agree with Assaltwaffle. This is not realistic to apply.

I will close this thread.