- 6,104
- 5,102
Just making this thread to let everyone know I'm open to suggestions for better names for certian types, as I came up with them on the fly, or adjustments to the scale for the lower types. Whichever is more convenient for our purposes.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Large Size (Names and so forth)
- Thread starter Sera_EX
- Start date
-
- Tags
- large size
- 1,322
- 94
There should be a colan, not a semi-colan here.
I hope this is helpful.
- 10,674
- 6,326
We've needed a page for this for awhile..
The name seems fine, if a little basic. I can't really think of anything better. I think more examples for the higher end levels could be used, though. Some ideas:
Ego the Living Planet and The Space Giant for planetary
Eris and Gorrl the Living Galaxy for Galactic
The Phoenix and The Cosmic Imaginatio for multiversal
The name seems fine, if a little basic. I can't really think of anything better. I think more examples for the higher end levels could be used, though. Some ideas:
Ego the Living Planet and The Space Giant for planetary
Eris and Gorrl the Living Galaxy for Galactic
The Phoenix and The Cosmic Imaginatio for multiversal
- 15,407
- 5,717
Amitabha for Universal too could fit.
- 6,104
- 5,102
- Thread starter
- #5
Careless typo (I'm on my phone). Thanks!
@Darkanine
Wonderful. Thanks. Also, would you happen to know how to change the name of a category? Large Sized Characters should probably just be Large Characters (Giants can be a sub-category perhaps). It's not harmful, just my OCD talking here lol.
@Darkanine
Wonderful. Thanks. Also, would you happen to know how to change the name of a category? Large Sized Characters should probably just be Large Characters (Giants can be a sub-category perhaps). It's not harmful, just my OCD talking here lol.
- 33,405
- 8,416
So, do a lot of Digimon scale to this? I know Examon does, but Digimon sizes vary from media to media. Either way, this seems good. Maybe sub sections like Regen. For like planet sized beings we can put "Large Size (Planetary)" on the file.
- 4,652
- 1,328
I don't know about Amitabha being our example for universal size, given how much it dwarves the universe (and that's an understatement).
- 15,407
- 5,717
Well it's much bigger than the observable universe. The real universe could be far bigger for all we know.
- 10,393
- 3,344
Omnipresence isn't really... size.
The question is who can qualify for multiversal size.
The question is who can qualify for multiversal size.
- 15,407
- 5,717
Depends on the omnipresence. Most omnipresents aren't physically everywhere at once. Like they aren't one big mass of shambling matter the size of a universe. Some are though, such as Bender.
- 10,393
- 3,344
W h o is this tho?
- 33,405
- 8,416
- 3,047
- 2,605
Well, that information is from profiles or games, and always in games the Digital World is referred to as a universe / multiverse.
- 509
- 22
What about True Infinity-sized beings?
- 509
- 22
Should we include such beings?
- 19,117
- 6,333
The size of a 1-A cannot be measured. The size of a higher dimensional can.
So immeasurable isn't really wrong.
Anyway I still agree with The Cosmic Imaginatio for multiversal due to being a living sentient multiverse.
So immeasurable isn't really wrong.
Anyway I still agree with The Cosmic Imaginatio for multiversal due to being a living sentient multiverse.
- 7,681
- 996
I mean, with constant growth, she should be at the size of a Multiverse at her full potential.
- 7,681
- 996
Okay.
I just found it odd for those with constant growth ability and has max potwntial 2-A to be only galactic in size.
I just found it odd for those with constant growth ability and has max potwntial 2-A to be only galactic in size.
- 6,104
- 5,102
- Thread starter
- #32
I see there's more confusion about multiversal size.
Basically:
>Bigger than a significant portion of the universe or as big as universe. (Universe size).
>Bigger than the universe (see the pic of Kasuga I posted above) (Multiverse size).
It's like if you're bigger than even the largest of planets, you are star sized. So any character larger than the universe will suffice. There's a good number of characters that qualify, they just don't have profiles yet (a certain carterpillar comes to mind).
Multiverse size is indeed even more rare than the already rare universe size (as stated above). The Cosmic Imagination definitely qualifies if it is the multiverse.
Basically:
>Bigger than a significant portion of the universe or as big as universe. (Universe size).
>Bigger than the universe (see the pic of Kasuga I posted above) (Multiverse size).
It's like if you're bigger than even the largest of planets, you are star sized. So any character larger than the universe will suffice. There's a good number of characters that qualify, they just don't have profiles yet (a certain carterpillar comes to mind).
Multiverse size is indeed even more rare than the already rare universe size (as stated above). The Cosmic Imagination definitely qualifies if it is the multiverse.
- 4,652
- 1,328
- 19,117
- 6,333
Immeasurable = Something that cannot be measured. 1-A size cannot be measured.
If we call tier High 2-A to High 1-B size higher dimensional, 1-A can be immeasurable size.
I'm also positive that you can determine that Yog-Sothoth is bigger than Nyarlatothep and they are both beyond dimensional. So it isn't a meaningless concept for 1-As or above
If we call tier High 2-A to High 1-B size higher dimensional, 1-A can be immeasurable size.
I'm also positive that you can determine that Yog-Sothoth is bigger than Nyarlatothep and they are both beyond dimensional. So it isn't a meaningless concept for 1-As or above
- 1,096
- 94
No, again. The concept of size(space-time) is entirely meaningless for 1-A's. Just as range is meaningless for them as well
If they ever say a 1-A is "bigger" than another then those are just metaphors. It does not mean anything at all.
Also, technically size does not really equal to higher dimensions, just as you can't measure speed for 4-D speed, this holds the same significance in higher dimensions.
If they ever say a 1-A is "bigger" than another then those are just metaphors. It does not mean anything at all.
Also, technically size does not really equal to higher dimensions, just as you can't measure speed for 4-D speed, this holds the same significance in higher dimensions.
Similar threads
