• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Large Size (Names and so forth)

@Ever

That's what the definition on the page says, ye.
 
Well, I think that you can add them as examples to the page then.
 
Do characters that become "one with the universe/multiverse" count or is it just people who have bodies physically that size?
 
If you're "one with the uni/multiverse" it counts. As characters that literally translate to those levels fully are extremely rare. Even more so than higher-dimensional ones.
 
I think Type 9 should be revised a bit. "Characters larger than the entire universe." technically applies to those who are one with the universe on a Low 2-C scale, especially Infinite Zamasu.
 
There is still the issue if omnipresence counts. Like, Madoka as the LoC is "bigger" than the multiverse, but it's a non-corporeal kind of size. She is everywhere as a concept
 
Well Sera said incorporeal "one with" types count. So I'd think it would.
 
Superman did not literally become one with the universe. He still had a physical form.
 
He did not fully transcend to a higher state of being. He simply became connected to the entire universe by holding the sword. Being able to control the universe is not the same thing as being as large as the universe.
 
Maybe the justification should be changed then. From "Became one with the universe throughout all time" to "Able to control the entire universe throughout all time".
 
Yes, or maybe: "Became connected to and able to control the entire universe throughout all time."
 
Okay. I will wait for the others to reply, so we do not close this thread prematurely.
 
@Ryukama

Yes, a larger than galaxy/multi-galaxy size can be added. Since classifying all of that as just Galaxy Sized is a bit of a gross generalization.
 
@Sera Loveheart

What about multi-solar system sized? Characters with this size are too big for the largest stars.
 
Universe size includes characters that are a significant portion of the Universe. So while Multi-Galaxy size is fine, a character shown to be larger than let's say, 100,000,000,000 galaxies, is Universe size.
 
@Ogurtsow

Hmm. I still think we should classify them more generally. Stellar Size should include stars and solar systems.

@Ventus

Honey, that's literally the size of the known universe.
 
The observable universe is estimated to contain 200 billion to 2 trillion galaxies (ten times more than previously thought). 100 billion was the previously established size of the "known universe", but it still qualifies as a significant enough portion. So if you're ever reading a novel and it says "he towers over 100 billion galaxies", then they are literally referencing the size of the known universe.
 
Well, there amount of galaxies in the observable universe is at least equal or greater to the amount of sand grains in every non-artificial beach on earth.
 
@Sera If you want Stellar to be broad enough to include stars and multiple star systems, maybe Galactic can be broad enough to include galaxies and multiple galaxies.

We'd just change the description a bit. "Characters who at least comparable in size with galaxies, and at most dwarf galaxies yet are still considerably smaller than the observable universe"
 
@Ryu

Okey dokey.

@All

There's one more thing I am unsure of. Should 5-dimensional beings count as Higher-Dimensional size or Multiverse size since they are High Multiverse level+? This isn't including characters that simply have 5-dimensional power of course (such as Asriel), but actual 5-dimensional beings.
 
@Sera

They are larger in size than entire multiverse. It's should be Higher-Dimensional size.

Anyway, you need to specify on page minimum size for representatives of space types. For example, Mars for planetary sized, Sun for stellar sized, NGC 3310 for galactic sized.
 
Why Mars? Mercury is not a dwarf planet, it should qualify.
 
@Sera

Mercury is smaller than some of Jupiter and Saturn's moons. There is real confusion and some people will not be able to understand to what type it is possible to take large Moon-sized character.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Flashlight237
Large Size Calculations Change
Replies
2
Views
366
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
Caleb1775
Adding more examples for Acausality, Small Size, and Large Size
Replies
0
Views
434
Caleb1775
Caleb1775
GameplAyex
Janemba's First Form Large Size Upgrade from Type 0 to type 1
Replies
4
Views
877
ProudLearner
ProudLearner
Fixxed
Uncountable infinity superiority (not size), some qualitative statement
Replies
5
Views
908
Fixxed
Fixxed
Flashlight237
  • Locked
The Issues With Large Size Type 4 And How To Fix It
Replies
26
Views
4K
Duedate8898
Duedate8898
Back
Top