Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea what that means to be honest.TheMonsterOfTheAbyss said:Does the fact that SAO character's "souls" are quantum fields (or something along those lines, I just read a few volumes) not grant them any resistance to soul manipulation? That's weird.
Souls across verses generally aren't, they're not granted immunity to soul based abilities simply because they differ in one way or another, otherwise soul based abilities would only really work in the verse they come from.TheMonsterOfTheAbyss said:It just means that the verse's "souls" are not conventional.
I think it was Krito vs YhwachPurgy said:Soul Crush gg
Also I think this was done before
This.TheMonsterOfTheAbyss said:Ok, got it. What about their game/simulation avatars? Are they considered to be suseptible to soul manipulation?
Of course they are, why wouldn't they? They explicity have souls on Alicization.TheMonsterOfTheAbyss said:Ok, got it. What about their game/simulation avatars? Are they considered to be suseptible to soul manipulation?
Don't know about Samurai 8 so can't comment on that but I've never seen this brought up, nor is it mentioned on the Soul Manipulation page or anywhere else. As I said earlier, the way souls function across fictional universes varies quite a lot, if we only allowed it to affect verses with similar soul functions then you might aswell just restrict soul based abilities to their respective verse which is not only unfair but also illogical since the same argument could be made to restrict a lot of abilities like that.YungManzi said:Some people are granted some form of resistance or even flat out unequalized if the souls are not equal enough.
Hell, it's the reason why Samurai in Samurai 8 have soul resistance. Their souls are completely different from something like a bleach soul.
Same reason why the slime peeps argue you can't mind hax their characters without soul manipulation because their minds are their souls (Or reside inside of them or something like that).
Or characters who are machines and their minds are just a bunch of algorithms, they're still technically minds, but they're completely different from standard mind control. Therefore the person with mind hax needs feats of effecting machines with their mind hax.
I never said you said that... Infact I literally said "similar", not exact. Calm down and carefully read what I'm writing.YungManzi said:No. You're missing the point.
I'm not saying that the souls have to be exactly the same in order for equalization to happen. Please re-read my mind hax analogy. That obviously wasn't what I was getting at.
Larger Issue: Why the hell should you be able to soul manip someone who's soul is nowhere near equivalent to your verse's soul?
Like in a verse where souls are just someone's consciousness/thoughts and are basically synonymous with their minds.
It really doesn't matter. Unless there's a forum rule or something saying what you're suggesting is correct, then that's not how things are debated here.TheMonsterOfTheAbyss said:Why are you using "behave" and "function" anyways? This is more about the fundamental nature of them, their structure, what they're made of. Not what they do.
There needs to be a rule or official clarification otherwise it's just an opinion. I've never seen this argument made and I'm 99% this is the 2nd or 3rd SK vs Kirito thread.YungManzi said:Why the heck would there need to be a rule stating such?
It's already been established by accepted profiles here, and it's honestly a pretty uncontroversial point.
You're the first person I've seen even argue against it.
That's not what I said though is it? Poor strawman honestly, I've seen much better. We generally use things that are officially accepted here to debate and not our opinions, but that isn't to say your opinion can't be right, but as an example, I can't just go into a debate claiming Goku is 11D and tier 1 because that goes against his profile and what is accepted.TheMonsterOfTheAbyss said:if there's not a rule I can't possibly be correct? What kind of logic is that? That's brings as much value to the conversation as me saying that there's not a rule about equalization of souls you can't debate like that for it. AKA, nothing.
Glad you understood this time.TheMonsterOfTheAbyss said:Wording was much better this time. I understand what you are attempting to convey better now, perhaps I won't strawman this time.
This is a case by case thing, there is nothing that is "accepted" as a rule written somewhere as you want here for either side of our argument as far as I am aware. Unlike with your analogy which makes use of something set in stone by the community and someone trying to use their idea which contradicts it in a vs thread so, false analogy.