-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
JJK AP Downgrade
- Thread starter Arkenis
- Start date
- Status
- 1,638
- 1,258
makes sense
- 1,359
- 1,162
Yeah it’s looking bad for kazuma rn ngl
- 5,816
- 3,737
I agree, but Mahito's Instant Spirit Body of Killing is a 3x increase, not a 2x. A 100% increase is a 2x increase, thus it follows that a 200% increase would be 3x.
- 2,336
- 1,442
What is your personal Domain Expansion hand sign?
Anyways, I agree with the downgrade, but disagree with both the calcs used for the scaling.
For the first calc, the anime doesn't actually show us the tree moving or rising from the ground, so we can't calculate its speed using the frames. The anime shows us a blurry still image that gets unblurred, so the tree's movement was done off-screen and could've taken a lot more time than what the calc assumes (for example, one second, or half a second).
Furthermore, it implies that Hanami is capable of casual spamming of supersonic attacks since it is stated that he sacrifices power and speed in exchange of making larger creations. The speed downgrade CRT is coming to an overall agreement that supersonic speed is rare.
As for the second calc, it uses this panel to scale the size of the crater:
However, we get a clearer prespective, and it shows that the crater is actually much smaller than what is calculated (The calc makes the crater ellipsoidic with a width of 10 meters and depth of 17 meters. Notice that the ground is not that thick and above hollowed-out space):
Also Uzumaki is a Maximum technique, so it doesn't scale to regular punches and kicks.
Time to find something else to scale with.
Anyways, I agree with the downgrade, but disagree with both the calcs used for the scaling.
For the first calc, the anime doesn't actually show us the tree moving or rising from the ground, so we can't calculate its speed using the frames. The anime shows us a blurry still image that gets unblurred, so the tree's movement was done off-screen and could've taken a lot more time than what the calc assumes (for example, one second, or half a second).
Furthermore, it implies that Hanami is capable of casual spamming of supersonic attacks since it is stated that he sacrifices power and speed in exchange of making larger creations. The speed downgrade CRT is coming to an overall agreement that supersonic speed is rare.
As for the second calc, it uses this panel to scale the size of the crater:
However, we get a clearer prespective, and it shows that the crater is actually much smaller than what is calculated (The calc makes the crater ellipsoidic with a width of 10 meters and depth of 17 meters. Notice that the ground is not that thick and above hollowed-out space):
Also Uzumaki is a Maximum technique, so it doesn't scale to regular punches and kicks.
Time to find something else to scale with.
Last edited:
- 11,539
- 10,953
That second painel doesn't even show the full crater
- 2,336
- 1,442
That is beside the point. It contradicts what is calculated/assumed.
- 9,385
- 6,680
- 5,816
- 3,737
From a glance, it doesn't look like there's actually a hollow space beneath. That just seems to be where the light doesn't reach into the crater. You can see cracks on the side of the crater reaching into the darkness before it gets too dark to see cracks. Meaning the depth expands past the darkness. But it def wouldn't hurt to calc the feat using a different angle. I just don't think it's a cylindrical a couple meters thick over hollow ground.As for the second calc, it uses this panel to scale the size of the crater:
However, we get a clearer prespective, and it shows that the crater is actually much smaller than what is calculated (The calc makes the crater ellipsoidic with a width of 10 meters and depth of 17 meters. Notice that the ground is not that thick and above hollowed-out space):
Also Uzumaki is a Maximum technique, so it doesn't scale to regular punches and kicks.
Time to find something else to scale with.
- 31,208
- 27,406
Call me the killer of fun, but save the memes for Fun & Games threads. Not going to let a CRT get clogged up with them.
Giannysmag
He/Him- 4,206
- 7,199
Neutral for now doe to the issues with the calcs @ShadowWhoWalks talked about, but i agree with the overall premise of the thread
- 15,649
- 11,716
The killer of fun
- 2,336
- 1,442
I can accept that.
With the width adjusted, I think it would be on the lower end of 8-A.
- 5,816
- 3,737
I'll go do a recalc of it using that other angle. Tho the angle does lowball the depth since it's a side profile shot. So I might have to use the other shot to some extent. Mind giving me the chapter number? Shibuya arc is long.
- 4,108
- 3,129
- 1,359
- 1,162
Actually, yeah I agree with this
- 5,816
- 3,737
Aight, I'll be on it.
- 5,816
- 3,737
Just so we're on the same foot before I make the calc, we agree that the shape is cylindrical and that the length and width would be the same. And that the width only looks skinnier because of the angle the shot is at, right? Don't wanna make a calc only for everyone to disagree with that.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 16,835
- 12,523
Agree with the thread.
Btw weren't there few calculation from JJK 0? Are they lower than these?
Btw weren't there few calculation from JJK 0? Are they lower than these?
- 4,108
- 3,129
Yeah I agree with this
- 1,359
- 1,162
Yeah
- 5,816
- 3,737
I looked into the next chapter, its width might actually be less than its length. But more importantly, I found 3 shots of the crater. I want everyone to give their opinion on which pic would be best for getting the depth of the crater. I think 1 or 3 personally.
Ped2018
He/Him- 5,003
- 6,032
3rd oneI looked into the next chapter, its width might actually be less than its length. But more importantly, I found 3 shots of the crater. I want everyone to give their opinion on which pic would be best for getting the depth of the crater. I think 1 or 3 personally.
- 2,336
- 1,442
a and h are the same.
b is smaller.
Imo, getting the depth from 1 is best. Basically the same angsize methodology from Life.I looked into the next chapter, its width might actually be less than its length. But more importantly, I found 3 shots of the crater. I want everyone to give their opinion on which pic would be best for getting the depth of the crater. I think 1 or 3 personally.
Giannysmag
He/Him- 4,206
- 7,199
Probably the thirdI looked into the next chapter, its width might actually be less than its length. But more importantly, I found 3 shots of the crater. I want everyone to give their opinion on which pic would be best for getting the depth of the crater. I think 1 or 3 personally.
Arkenis
They/Them- 16,842
- 7,737
- Thread starter
- #35
I think the first one should be used to measure depth and the second can be for width. The third just doesn't show enough and we can tell the crater grows in width in other panels so it cant be usedI looked into the next chapter, its width might actually be less than its length. But more importantly, I found 3 shots of the crater. I want everyone to give their opinion on which pic would be best for getting the depth of the crater. I think 1 or 3 personally.
- 5,816
- 3,737
That's what I was thinking. If that's the case, do you think using the same depth is fair given Kusakabe is the closest to the edge and thus would be best for comparing to the depth?
- 2,336
- 1,442
Yeah, he appears close enough to the edge to act as a reference for the depth.
- 19,530
- 3,924
Thread makes sense so I agree with the changes
- 5,816
- 3,737
- Status
