• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Issues with getting the distance

Distance being less than planet's radius is not an issue, because you're not getting distance to planet's center in the first place. Otherwise you wouldn't apply Planet Curvature Scaling. You're finding distance to this circle.
 
Distance being less than planet's radius is not an issue, because you're not getting distance to planet's center in the first place. Otherwise you wouldn't apply Planet Curvature Scaling. You're finding distance to this circle.
I wish I knew this sooner! Should this be added to calculations guide so that anyone trying to find the distance between planets would have a better idea of how to do so?
 
I think it's already mentioned in PCS page that the reasoning is that you're seeing only a part of sphere instead of full diameter as many would think. But yeah if have a good visual (I just used first one I got on internet) adding that can help people visualize better.

Edit: distance to surface will be a lil more complex to find but AFAIK we generally ignore that and most of planet calcs simply don't account for it.
 
Edit: distance to surface will be a lil more complex to find but AFAIK we generally ignore that and most of planet calcs simply don't account for it.
Were a and b found correctly, or should I have used the Corrected planet diameter?
 
Were a and b found correctly, or should I have used the Corrected planet diameter?
You should use corrected radius for a. Also if you add sqrt(R^2 - (corrected radius)^2) then you find distance to planet's center, if you want surface then subtract true radius at the end (actually not 100% accurate since ship-center and POV-center aren't at the same angle but it'll work as a simplified method).
 

Kinetic Energy​

0.5*515457409.02852*994.9733906^2 = 2.55144213444412E+14 J or 6.09809305555478E+04 Tons of TNT (7-C+)
Is this the maximum explosion value Vader can withstand, or is it different?
 
I'm not sure if I can call it the maximum value, this calc also exists, but it validity is contended: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Hagane_no_Saiyajin/Vader_survives_planetary_explosion

Although it's really the most accurate value you can get from the calc
I'm referring to the calculation in this thread.

I know there's a difference between the AP of the explosion and the AP the character can withstand from the explosion, since it's almost never the maximum value.

For example, I know that if the character isn't near the epicenter, the value is reduced. Is Vader, in this calculation, withstanding the maximum calculated value, or is there a difference?
 
@Hagane_no_Saiyajin could you elaborate this part? Like can you mark on the panel and show me what this 33.9 degrees mean here?

9zDmJgo.jpeg
 
Back
Top