• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Issue with 9-B+ Marvel people

So what should we do here? 🙏
No staff have voted here (though I'll try reaching out to some), though honestly I lean in favor of Option A, which changes all the 9-B+ to Baseline 9-A, since 1.6 is a much better gap for downscaling than making it an unknown value of 9-B.

Impress is right that Option C is no better, IMO.
 
What do you think that we should do here? 🙏
Well since we have this rule now:
It's possible for a character depicted as vastly superior to another in a statistic to achieve a tier above or the "+" rating of their current tier if they are 1.2x or less away from the rating. However, such ratings ultimately require case-by-case analysis, such as consistency, the length of any/all scaling chains, and how they are portrayed within the work itself. A gap of over 1.2x would not be considered for such an upscaling to avoid potential scaling chain issues.
They'd just be "At most 9-A" since they're over the 1.2x upscaling/downscaling statistic.

Assuming it wouldn't be an outlier I guess
 
Thank you for helping out. That seems fine to me as well then. 🙏❤️
 
What do you think that we should do here? 🙏

This accepted 9-A calc is still on Deadpool's profile for durability despite his AP/durability supposedly only being 9-B+. Is the calc still good or no?
This calc works more for Black Panther than Deadpool, truth be told. Deadpool, during the entire fight was being stomped really hard, but that's more due to skill difference, BP is far superior than DP and is easily top 5 most skilled fighters. I took a closer look at the comic this feat came from, and Deadpool at later pages shows no signs of damage or tiredness. So, technically, it's a good calc.

(Like I said many times before, giving context and comic issues at the calc blog should become the norm)
 
It seems like a better feat for Black Panther, yes, especially given that Deadpool heals very quickly. 🙏
 
This calc works more for Black Panther than Deadpool, truth be told. Deadpool, during the entire fight was being stomped really hard, but that's more due to skill difference, BP is far superior than DP and is easily top 5 most skilled fighters. I took a closer look at the comic this feat came from, and Deadpool at later pages shows no signs of damage or tiredness. So, technically, it's a good calc.

(Like I said many times before, giving context and comic issues at the calc blog should become the norm)
It seems like a better feat for Black Panther, yes, especially given that Deadpool heals very quickly. 🙏
True, though Deadpool takes that 9-A hit and gets up pretty quickly, and there's no blood or bone-breaking.

Plus it seemed like more of a skill stomp, like Tomfer said, than a power stomp.

Though honestly we should save that calc stuff for a second thread, after this one concludes (yes I know I'm the one who brought this calc up, so my b)
 
Back
Top