-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Is this a low-2C or 2-C?
- Thread starter Seventy96
- Start date
-
- Tags
- tiering system
- 4,824
- 407
That's not actually true. At that point it would be 2-C look the creation trio use to scale like that after all.(from low 2-C to 2-C just cus the power gap was absurd)Akreious said:
- 4,824
- 407
No A while back they scaled from each other. (The reason being that there heart beats and breathing substante a timeline and universe)DMB 1 said:
- 12,524
- 3,492
Low 2-C. Also, multipliers do you not get you upgraded to 2-C. Even if you're infinitely above baseline Low 2-C you'd still be a Low 2-C.
- 6,594
- 1,708
An 4D universe infinity^infinity would be infinitley above baseline 2-A,. A multiverse, is for all intents and purposes, an infinite number if universes combined. Therefore a universe infinitley bigger than an already infinite universe would be 2-A. It should logically contain infinite low 2-C scale universes.Akreious said:
- 12,524
- 3,492
An 4D universe infinity^infinity would be infinitley above baseline 2-A,. A multiverse, is for all intents and purposes, an infinite number if universes combined. Therefore a universe infinitley bigger than an already infinite universe would be 2-A. It should logically contain infinite low 2-C scale universes.
No, it would still only be Low 2-C because it's one universe. 2-A is an infinite number of universes.
No, it would still only be Low 2-C because it's one universe. 2-A is an infinite number of universes.
- 6,594
- 1,708
Yeah but how? Wouldn't an infinitley bigger than normal low 2-C universe be able to contain an infinite number?
- 12,524
- 3,492
Because the distance between space-time continuums is unquantified. You don't jump tiers in tiers High 3-A or higher by using multipliers.Lightbuster30 said:
- 9,253
- 2,731
I'm still not totally sure if I agree or not with this choice, because, while it excludes messy multipliers, it becomes weird when you go into the "infinitely above baseline" realm:
The whole "even infinite multipliers in Tier 2 wouldn't make someone 2-A because you can't measure the distance between universes with 3D distance" becomes weird when you take into a factor that adding 3.dimensional infinity to 4D power wouldn't change absolutely anything, and the character wouldn't really get any boost in power, so it would be more logical t assume that they would be talking about 4D power.
The whole "even infinite multipliers in Tier 2 wouldn't make someone 2-A because you can't measure the distance between universes with 3D distance" becomes weird when you take into a factor that adding 3.dimensional infinity to 4D power wouldn't change absolutely anything, and the character wouldn't really get any boost in power, so it would be more logical t assume that they would be talking about 4D power.
