-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Is the Kyoshi Island Calc to low, 6-B Avatar Update?
- Thread starter Mystic
- Start date
- 4,629
- 1,614
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Kepekley23/Avatar:_Recalc_of_Kyoshi's_island_splitting_feat?mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop
“Very good calc” is subjective plus the calc has to been put in a blog on VS Battle Wikia and evaluated.
Regardless, I am neutral regarding this since this requires some calc members too.
“Very good calc” is subjective plus the calc has to been put in a blog on VS Battle Wikia and evaluated.
Regardless, I am neutral regarding this since this requires some calc members too.
- 31,350
- 34,083
I think this was already recalculated multiple times before.
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #4
Only one iirc. That was why I posted this calc to see if it was good enough for an Avatar upgrade.
- 31,350
- 34,083
I mean, the Kyoshi feat has had results raging from Tier 7 to Tier 6; and most calc group members considered the lower ends more accurate.
- 4,629
- 1,614
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Gwynbleiddd/Avatar_Kyoshi_creates_an_Island_(calc)
Yeah, plus the math being posted by the OP isn’t necessarily correct and the methods had to taken in account in order to ensure it is accurate especially since we are given purely visual feats to say the least.
To claim a calc is outdated doesn’t necessarily mean it is incorrect or correct inherently.
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #7
What’s wrong with the calc I posted (sorry you worded your retort a bit weird grammatically). Methods to ensure a more accurate result were taken into account for this one, surely more than the one you posted above. Is it the result number that doesn’t match the tier or something else? Also I said it was outdated because there was a better done/suited calc for the feat. No shade to the person who did it if it came across that way.
Last edited:
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #8
Oh well, I thought this one was more accurate and done well, but if other calc groups member are fine with the lower ends that sucks. But I’d say this calc and the result are more accurate to the feat, especially when we see what Yangchen managed to do and her 7-A+ feat.
Last edited:
- 32,835
- 38,086
@Therefir @Dark-Carioca @DMUA @Mr._Bambu @DemonGodMitchAubin @Jasonsith @CloverDragon03 @Aguywhodoesthings @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Psychomaster35 @Migue79 @Armorchompy Your help here would be appreciated.
- 4,629
- 1,614
Correct. The issue does lies in the result as it is technically making a island by splitting a chunk of land and so on.
Also I think that is a bold claim in general since the calc from the forum you posted isn’t exactly what I call that solid.
Regardless, I am neutral
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #11
Your thoughts are understandable. Again I think this calc is the better one.
Last edited:
- 4,629
- 1,614
ATLA: Random Avatar triggering volcanic eruptions
vsbattles.fandom.com
There is also this calculation which isn’t considered 6C though.
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #13
Pretty sure there was another calc that put it at 6-C+ on this wiki iirc and two others on two different forums. But this one was the accepted before the other two could be evaluated. ¯\(ツ)/¯. Unfortunate.ATLA: Random Avatar triggering volcanic eruptions
There is also this calculation which isn’t considered 6C though.
- 4,629
- 1,614
I gonna have to look through some old threads since it has been a few year.
- 4,629
- 1,614
Also it was evaluated as well IIRC. @TheRustyOne was there too
- 31,350
- 34,083
I heard some people are looking forward to other Avatar feats, but for now; there is still Yangchen's High 7-A feat. I also don't think anyone calculated a pretty crazy feat in one of the comics so I heard. Toph has that mentions "Pushing the weight of the world" which I don't think should be assumed too literally but it sounds like something that would be Tier 6 minimum. But it also either feels outlierish or wouldn't scale to anyone by Toph and Avatar States. Toph is the strongest bender in the series who isn't an avatar or spirit, but that still sounds outlandish even for her.
- 1,870
- 956
Here is a newer calculation of that feat.ATLA: Random Avatar triggering volcanic eruptions
There is also this calculation which isn’t considered 6C though.
- 1,870
- 956
There's also the statement in Shadow of Kyoshi that Kuruk was able to throw around landmasses while he was in the Avatar state. A landmass is, at minimum, a large island according to wikipedia.
- 4,629
- 1,614
The problem with that calc of the same feat though is that it was never accepted or properly been evaluated to begin with so I don’t think we can use that calc at all
- 4,629
- 1,614
Provided it isn’t being hyperbolic and is being literal in that sense though.
At this point, we have to turn this QnA into a CRT.
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #24
So are 3 or more calc group members are needed to approve this recalc for it to be applied and used? Cus Psychomaster has approved in the comments so do 2 more need to say it’s fine for it to work? Again that old calc was done a long time ago and this newer one takes more into consideration for accuracy.
Last edited:
- 1,870
- 956
Wow, Kudos to Afro for that calc. Looks amazing.
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #26
- 1,870
- 956
Was it not posted on the calculation revision thread? Couldn't find it on there and I that would make it easier for members to see.
- 172
- 97
- Thread starter
- #28
It is on page 37 of the thread let me @ you.
Last edited:
- 1,870
- 956
I do think that Toph at least should be relooked at because of the size of the spirit library.
Similar threads
