• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Is Princess Peach's page composite?

Well, yes and no. Because there's no canon for the Matioverse, so while everything is allowed, everything is canon, so it's not really composite.
 
Then a feat from a spin-off game like a Mario Party should be fine?

Also, if Marioverse characters aren't composite, should Wario have a Composite Key as he does right now? Likewise, what of Donkey Kong?
 
With only 1 key instead of 2, as they currently have, you mean? In any case, if a Mario Party feat for Peach is fine, I probably ought to get to re-requesting that. (I do apologize for failing to mention that. It would be a particularly old repost.)
 
Dude, I've been trying to get Relativistic+ via a Mario Party feat for a while now. You're talking to the right guy ovo
 
Hopefully this isn't off-topic &/or pester-y, but if you're interested in giving your opinion, the request is up. I don't expect you to calc it, of course, though. No offense. Although, having posted it, I now recall why I shouldn't have expected it to bear much fruit.
 
No problem! But maybe hold your thanks in the event that this calc doesn't yield worthwhile results? Thanks for answering my questions, nonetheless.

Trying to stay somewhat on topic: Incidentally, if you'd prefer DK & Wario as without 2 keys -1 of them being "Composite"- then what on this Wiki makes them still that way? Presumably, there's some sort of... uhm... "stopgap"(?) holding back such a change, no?
 
Imaginym said:
No problem! But maybe hold your thanks in the event that this calc doesn't yield worthwhile results? Thanks for answering my questions, nonetheless.

Trying to stay somewhat on topic: Incidentally, if you'd prefer DK & Wario as without 2 keys -1 of them being "Composite"- then what on this Wiki makes them still that way? Presumably, there's some sort of... uhm... "stopgap"(?) holding back such a change, no?
The lack of a CRT by me ovo
 
I find it curious "Wiki makes them still that way" specifically is bolded, as though it is the site's fault itself, perhaps some of its software -or improbably, its related hardware- as opposed to the seemingly more likely possibility of the users using the site. XD

In any case, good to know.
 
I assume you meant to bold the part between the colon & the quotation mark, then? That is, "Incidentally, if you'd prefer DK & Wario as without 2 keys -1 of them being "Composite"- the "

(I feel like I shouldn't be making such trivial talk.)
 
I recall something about that. Which are there that aren't acknowledged on the wiki, however? Not that I doubt the likelihood of there being plenty.)
 
As long as it's not too off-topic. Cal, do you think here is fine, any personal interest aside?
 
Back
Top