- 32
- 0
I'm asking this because today I was browsing through Youtube and noticed a Youtuber named "SethTheProgrammer." While that doesn't necessarily matter, I noticed that he is somewhat reasonable but can still be a "mindless DBZ fanboy." Not to insult him, but I just saw that he was drunk with DBZ characters vs. any other character from any other franchise and was adamant in proving that the former would win against the latter (i.e. DBZ characters > any other). While that's an assumption on my part, I hope this introduction would shed some clarity for my next paragraph.
I'm fairly new here and I've participated in a few VS. debates, so I can't really say my requests have any real weight. But is it possible to ban a character from a VS. debate? I'm not saying to ban every DBZ character, but certain characters like Saitama; and here's why; basically, because of how people perceive how Saitama is written makes a fight go one way or another. While he has clearly defined limits, some fights are either mismatches or curbstomped. So why ask the question in the first place? Does said character have any business being in debates of this sort in the first place?
I know this can be an iffy question, but is it possible to outright ban a character from being used in a versus debate? Especially when one character is presumed to be "limitless" in potential even with an ongoing series that can possibly make them stronger? Why include Saitama in a fight when, even though it can be proven without a shadow of a doubt that he can outright annihilate a universe, that he couldn't touch someone like Kitty Pryde? Going back to my first paragraph, why use a highly controversial character in a versus debate? In hindsight, it makes no sense.
Or is it not that big of a deal?
I'm fairly new here and I've participated in a few VS. debates, so I can't really say my requests have any real weight. But is it possible to ban a character from a VS. debate? I'm not saying to ban every DBZ character, but certain characters like Saitama; and here's why; basically, because of how people perceive how Saitama is written makes a fight go one way or another. While he has clearly defined limits, some fights are either mismatches or curbstomped. So why ask the question in the first place? Does said character have any business being in debates of this sort in the first place?
I know this can be an iffy question, but is it possible to outright ban a character from being used in a versus debate? Especially when one character is presumed to be "limitless" in potential even with an ongoing series that can possibly make them stronger? Why include Saitama in a fight when, even though it can be proven without a shadow of a doubt that he can outright annihilate a universe, that he couldn't touch someone like Kitty Pryde? Going back to my first paragraph, why use a highly controversial character in a versus debate? In hindsight, it makes no sense.
Or is it not that big of a deal?