- 243
- 97
Yeah that should’ve been used imo. Not hard to make conservative estimates.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Invincible season 3 discussion
- Thread starter The_one_you_least_expect
- Start date
- 487
- 156
This is giving me deja vu, and may have even been from this sight. Huh, so she's definitely not stronger. Weird, but more headache than weird.
- 8,443
- 10,682
- Thread starter
- #203
not even gonna lie, I kinda forgot about the nervous system gun
- 1,531
- 481
The difference between H6-B and H6-A is extremely large. And this calculation will be lower when the things mentioned in the comments are corrected. So I would say no.Does this open up the possibility of Omni-man scaling to his High 6-A flaxan world feat? I'm pretty sure the reason we didn't use it was because it was far higher than anything either had shown up to that point.
Omni-Man Flies Across the Flaxan World
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 1,531
- 481
I looked at why this calculation is not used and the reason why it is not used is that it violates the KE rules. And it was recalculated using GBE instead of KE and the Low 6-B rating comes from this new calculation.Does this open up the possibility of Omni-man scaling to his High 6-A flaxan world feat? I'm pretty sure the reason we didn't use it was because it was far higher than anything either had shown up to that point.
Omni-Man Flies Across the Flaxan World
Omni-Man Recalc
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 1,531
- 481
We need to know the time frame to use it. But we don't.
- 8,459
- 3,171
YES YES
- 8,459
- 3,171
use the same values has the other asteroid that Mark deflected, is not that hard
- 1,531
- 481
There is no basis for using the values of the asteroid that Mark deflected.
- 11,887
- 11,382
Why would we need to know the time frame?
Being able to deflect an asteroid would require you to output more force than it's initial kinetic energy.
The kinetic energy of an asteroid the size of Texas moving at general asteroid/meteorite speeds would be decently into Moon level.
So bare minimum he'd need to overcome that in order to deflect it away from its trajectory. Especially so if it literally sends it flying backwards like how Mark did it.
- 1,531
- 481
And how long did it take Omni-Man to generate this energy and stop the asteroid? Because the longer it took, we would have to divide the KE by that time to calculate Omni-Man's AP.
The KE of the asteroid Mark stopped was at Island level, but because it took Mark so long to stopped the asteroid, Mark's AP only at 7-A.
Invincible: Meteor Catching
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 8,459
- 3,171
use the same valuesAnd how long did it take Omni-Man to generate this energy and stop the asteroid? Because the longer it took, we would have to divide the KE by that time to calculate Omni-Man's AP.
The KE of the asteroid Mark stopped was at Island level, but because it took Mark so long to stopped the asteroid, Mark's AP only at 7-A.
Invincible: Meteor Catching
- 1,531
- 481
There is no basis for this.
Using these values has the same validity for the time frame as using 39 minutes or 10 minutes or 5 seconds, and there is no valid basis for any of them.
- 8,459
- 3,171
and there's also no basis for not using the same values in the first place just to say that we shouldn't use calculation in general.
man, Omni man is just saying that Mark saved the country from a meteorite and says he deflected one the size of texas, why are we assuming that it is not a valid thing because we don't know the time, even thought in the context of the same, it is almost the same feat minus that the object is bigger.
assuming that he took alot more of effort or less effort is already a bigger assumption without basis than just assuming it is the same thing
- 1,531
- 481
As I said before, using the same value has the same validity as using 39 minutes and there is no basis for either.
I'm not saying the feat is not the same and not valid, I'm just saying we don't know how long it took him to do it.
Stopping an asteroid in 30 seconds is the same feat as stopping it in an hour. But even if these two are the same feat, there is a huge difference between the results.
It's not a bigger assumption. It is an equally valid assumption as using the time it took Mark to stop the asteroid.
- 345
- 81
Dude, it's a training scene, the statement is thrown in there to draw a parallel between each other and to put into perpective their gap in power. Saying he high-diffed it is a bigger assumption
Similar threads
