EL_xWatcher1234x
He/Him- 2,923
- 1,171
This series deserve a better adaptation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the adaptation is good, the animation is what kinda sucks.This series deserve a better adaptation.
It’s to stop KE that’s going by at like MHS+ but only cracks a wall where the actual KE would’ve blown it apart.Oh that's the rule? Pretty eh imo. And yeah changes shot before the explosions dissipate.
Hmm, fair. Yeah rewatching it the explosions were still expanding before cutting out. Probably best to do this in another thread but idk. Gonna change the comment on the calcSince we never get a full shot of the planet afterward, I can't really say what kind of damage was left.
It's possible it left a massive crater large enough that it doesn't break anything. Maybe it could be a possibly rating?
However, Omni-Man's feat was rather small lines. While this feat is a massive explosion that wiped those places off the map. I think there might be something here. Maybe it can be discussed in a future CRT.
Thank you for the evaluation regardless.
I’m guessing cause he was still able to draw blood from them and cause Invincible has a glass cannon issue with its charactersVery cool recent episode.
Semi-related, why is the Immortal still ranked as Low 6-B? It's clear that he's massively outclassed by the top tiers in the verse.
- He's been easily killed by Low 6-B characters consistently. Both Omni-Man kills were basically one-shots once he landed a clean hit, and the alternate Omni-Man cut through him like paper.
- Alternate Invincible crushed Immortal's head easily, who chronologically should be around season 2 levels, and in the latest episode
Mark easily ripped Immortal's head off once he started trying.- Season 2 Invincible states and proves that he is stronger and faster than the Immortal, and he himself is far below Omni-Man himself (though in that case the backscaling is sort of acceptable). We also have recent proof where the Immortal has a somewhat even fight with a Mauler twin, while start of season 2 Invincible was able to beat numerous of them before being overwhelmed, and Oliver easily one-shot them.
- Immortal was unable to harm Allen with any of his attacks except an eye poke, with Allen being comparable to
high ranking viltrumites/Omni-Man. Even if Allen was holding back vs Omni-Man's executioner, he still admits he could have been killed by that viltrumite- The Immortal's best showings are in scenarios where he has significant advantages. In the initial Guardians fight, he loses a 7v1 and by the time he can draw blood with his attacks, Omni-Man is already restrained and weakened from Red Rush's assault, who hit him hundreds of times. In the episode 7 fight, Omni-Man is fatigued and distracted with Mark's fight with the monster, and the only lasting damage that Immortal deals is, again, an eye poke. Also, despite how we usually scale things, Invincible is very liberal with blood splatter and I don't think it's that concrete to be used for scaling.
Thankfully not as egregious as it could've been. That Viltrumite looked to be around Nolan's level, and so while he can cause internal damage with a single blow, Allen still just layed there when he could've continued fighting.Great episode. Allen is def a little weaker relative to Viltrumites compared to his comic counterpart, however I think this makes it more interesting story-wise.
It was the gums, the most durable of flesh. Immortal 1A babyyyI mean, that works both ways. Drawing blood isn't that notable in a verse where everyone has paper skin, I don't think it's enough to justify Immortal's massive back-scaling.
Fairs.
I second this, but it's still decent. I hope we get a TWD comic show some day.This series deserve a better adaptation.
Future Mark does seem to ignore Earth after he leaves. Immortal was indeed being influenced, by a proven ruler whose ideas he was filtering for implementation, but it's still that the mental load of living so long that has gotten to him. They acknowledged the sun as being a viable way of killing himself in the show, which wasn't brought up in the comic. There also wasn't any "coward" talk, as the scene simply wasn't nearly as long as in the show.Was the Immortal's motivation in this arc in the comics as stupid?
He accuses Mark of inaction, which causes innocent people to die, while his ego did not allow him to leave the post. He has already lived for several thousand years, if not more. He had already lost loved ones many times. Hell, he even had the experience of faking his own death to step down from a leadership position when he was Lincoln.
All his words just don't have any weight. He could have found smart rulers and acted as a protector himself. Something from the category of Integra and Alucard relations.
I would understand if someone had influenced his mind or if he had lost his memory due to a brain injury. But it's the same person. He is aware of his actions. He realizes that he is doing the wrong thing.
He just behaves like a moody kid in a store, only he doesn't ask for a set of legos, but for his head to be torn off.
That is, as I understand it, it was even more ridiculous in the comic.Future Mark does seem to ignore Earth after he leaves. Immortal was indeed being influenced, by a proven ruler whose ideas he was filtering for implementation, but it's still that the mental load of living so long that has gotten to him. They acknowledged the sun as being a viable way of himself in the show, which wasn't brought up in the comic. There also wasn't any "coward" talk, as the scene simply wasn't nearly as long as in the show.
It may have to do with the astronomical difference in responsibility he had in the superhero phase of his life, and that he had help from someone capable of doing the job on their own.That is, as I understand it, it was even more ridiculous in the comic.
I don't know what you mean by the Sun, but if someone really influenced the Immortal, then this changes the situation.
It is very strange that he lived for several millennia and did not lose the desire to be a hero, but then the same period was enough for him to go crazy.
And again, based on his background, he would rather have faked his death and gone to live in the mountains, or at least killed himself in the Sun, but he preferred to become a murderer.
It sounds logical, but last time he faked his death and began to live among ordinary people. He could find those who would rule the world, while he himself would be engaged in helping others, saving the Earth from meteorites and the like.It may have to do with the astronomical difference in responsibility he had in the superhero phase of his life, and that he had help from someone capable of doing the job on their own.
Nolan does note that Allen was holding back to motivate him to act and Allen does admit to it.Thankfully not as egregious as it could've been. That Viltrumite looked to be around Nolan's level, and so while he can cause internal damage with a single blow, Allen still just layed there when he could've continued fighting.
He says it because Allen portrayed it as suchThat being said, Nolan also notes that Allen could have died if he kept that up.
We gonna ignore the blood spatter from one punch? Obviously they could’ve killed him lol. This is consistent in the show and comic - they would’ve executed Allen along with Nolan.He says it because Allen portrayed it as such
Are you referring to comic spoilers or don’t knowFuture Mark does seem to ignore Earth after he leaves. Immortal was indeed being influenced, by a proven ruler whose ideas he was filtering for implementation, but it's still that the mental load of living so long that has gotten to him. They acknowledged the sun as being a viable way of killing himself in the show, which wasn't brought up in the comic. There also wasn't any "coward" talk, as the scene simply wasn't nearly as long as in the show.
Wasn't it just established in this thread simply drawing blood isn't enough to scale ? lolWe gonna ignore the blood spatter from one punch? Obviously they could’ve killed him lol. This is consistent in the show and comic - they would’ve executed Allen along with Nolan.
(I've read the comic)I would understand if someone had influenced his mind or if he had lost his memory due to a brain injury. But it's the same person. He is aware of his actions. He realizes that he is doing the wrong thing.
He just behaves like a moody kid in a store, only he doesn't ask for a set of legos, but for his head to be torn off.
Blood spatter from mouth and making him spit blood from a gut punch are 2 far-and-away different events. And real impact was being drawn when he was bashing on him. It takes common sense to see what’s cosmetic and what isn’t. Nolan said the dude would’ve killed him. This is like arguing Allen drawing blood from Anissa has equal usefulness to ImmortalWasn't it just established in this thread simply drawing blood isn't enough to scale ? lol
Nolan said it himself, for someone who was about to die he recovered pretty quickly, and it likely isn't his Accelerated Development since we know that takes time
bleeding
Mark a bit in the recent episode. Reaction is a massive factor.Likely 2-B to 2-A for the show thanks to the stupid big brain guy while the comics are solidly tier 1 due to the shared Image comics cosmology. Due to budget constraints, royalties and bureaucratic red tape unfortunately the adaptation will likely be missing a ton of crossover characters (Spawn, Tech-Jacket, Supreme, etc) a couple of which are actually plot relevant in the comics outside just fanservice but I guess in return the show has more room to flesh out certain moments and panels in the comics (e.g Omni-Man Vs the Guardians of the Globe).What's the size of the cosmology ?
I know, and I am.Are you referring to comic spoilers or don’t know
What a surpriseBattle beast is low 6-B now
Infinity Ray is also stated to blow up stars in the comicenhanced (Infinity Ray blowing up a star)
Ngl, I'd be as bold to say 5 seconds could be a reasonable high-end timeframe, it all happens in one panel and it's portrayed to be quickly with Zack's reaction.Can someone check/approve/deny this already? Been a while and 2 bumps in after evaluation.
![]()
Tech Jacket tosses Kresh spaceship to the Sun calc
vsbattles.fandom.com
Does it have to be divided by 3 ? They describe it as a singular objectAlso, this. Replied to a calc mod long time ago, who since hasn’t responded. This is a great feat which shouldn’t be ignored for the verse, as it’d provide further consistency for their current tiers.
![]()
spaceship busts solar disk calc
vsbattles.fandom.com
We can ig but I cbf to add it rn. Can easily do so later just by dividing by distance.Ngl, I'd be as bold to say 5 seconds could be a reasonable high-end timeframe, it all happens in one panel and it's portrayed to be quickly with Zack's reaction.
Also, can't we also get Lifting Strength from it ?
Does it have to be divided by 3 ? They describe it as a singular object
You'd also need to pixel-scale Zack to the ship, also how about the another high-end ?We can ig but I cbf to add it rn. Can easily do so later just by dividing by distance.
Why would I need to do that. Can just measure the distance of his swingYou'd also need to pixel-scale Zack to the ship, also how about the another high-end ?
There is no evidence that it reached the surface of the sun, it could have exploded due to extreme heat.![]()
Tech Jacket tosses Kresh spaceship to the Sun calc
vsbattles.fandom.com
First one needs Planet Curvature Scaling done to it.![]()
spaceship busts solar disk calc
vsbattles.fandom.com
We see the Sun's mass ejection from the surface. Not sure other indicator we need. Why would a tiny ship be causing a Jupiter-sized explosion from burning? It literally makes no sense. Not only that, but we see it protruding from the surface only - it's not omni-directional or anything either. It's quite obviously on the surface, how could you think otherwise? For your theory to work, the ship would've either had to spontaneously explode nearly a full AU distance away from the Sun (since, judging by the explosion size, it couldn't have went too far from Tech Jacket, since it's not even 100m wide) OR the Sun's heat somehow caused it to explode large enough that it's planet-sized (since the corona starts about 200km from the surface, and 1AU is about 150 million km). Choose which one you're going with. Either are genuinely infinitely less plausible than my assertion, which I believe is crystal-clear and indubitable. I'll reserve opinion for calcs mods though, and discuss it with them if need-be.There is no evidence that it reached the surface of the sun, it could have exploded due to extreme heat.
This will make the size of the explosion appear larger than it actually is.
What about it needs curvature scaling lol what? Weird stipulations you're asking for here. Reread the calc.First one needs Planet Curvature Scaling done to it.
1 CGM member rejected this feat.We see the Sun's mass ejection from the surface. Not sure other indicator we need. Why would a tiny ship be causing a Jupiter-sized explosion from burning? It literally makes no sense. Not only that, but we see it protruding from the surface only - it's not omni-directional or anything either. It's quite obviously on the surface, how could you think otherwise? For your theory to work, the ship would've either had to spontaneously explode nearly a full AU distance away from the Sun (since, judging by the explosion size, it couldn't have went too far from Tech Jacket, since it's not even 100m wide) OR the Sun's heat somehow caused it to explode large enough that it's planet-sized (since the corona starts about 200km from the surface, and 1AU is about 150 million km). Choose which one you're going with. Either are genuinely infinitely less plausible than my assertion, which I believe is crystal-clear and indubitable. I'll reserve opinion for calcs mods though, and discuss it with them if need-be.
The exact size of the planet is not visible, so you have to use this formula. Lol.What about it needs curvature scaling lol what? Weird stipulations you're asking for here. Reread the calc.
That's fine. It was 2 years ago, and they weren't solid set on dismissing the feat due to that. I could paste my above reasoning if it comes to that, and if they're still not convinced or open for contention it's fine. Main dismissal at the end for the linked calc was usage of explosion formula in space. I made my calc knowing this one was posted already.1 CGM member rejected this feat.
I honestly still don't get what you're asking. I measured out the full planet size by following the arc, regardless of the full planet being shown or not. It's common practice for pixel calcs, didn't you know this? If you're somehow referring to the planet in the Conquest scan, I have zero reason to measure from there, since i'm calculating from the solar disk feat only. If you're referring to neither of those, then please elaborate.The exact size of the planet is not visible, so you have to use this formula. Lol.
Read this.I honestly still don't get what you're asking. I measured out the full planet size by following the arc, regardless of the full planet being shown or not. It's common practice for pixel calcs, didn't you know this? If you're somehow referring to the planet in the Conquest scan, I have zero reason to measure from there, since i'm calculating from the solar disk feat only. If you're referring to neither of those, then please elaborate.