*Insert meme about end of existence here*

[WeeklyBattles]

@Yobo 2 for Lavos and 3-4 for 1440

 

[FateAlbane]

@Yobo No, it's me, Kaltias, The real cal howard, Kepekley and Gargoyle One for Lavos.

That's four.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Kep How so?

 

[Holyhotsauce]

Just a question, doesn't 1440's bag have one more spot? I read that in a Tale somewhere.

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

@Weekly

You: That is incorrect information that needs to be adjusted.

You: I wasnt referring to the article itself being incorrect, i was referring to the description on his profile being oudated


Me:If a tale says that what was stated in the article is incorrect, that is by its very definition something that is contradictory.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Fate Not gonna acknowledge that 1440's cards can prevent Lavos from planet wiping like you said he would?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Azzy Yes, it would be, which is why we dont allow it here. If it flat out contradicts the article we dont allow it

 

[Kepekley23]

which the tales flesh out and expand on.

The tales are only allowed to add new things. They are not remotely allowed to go what the articles say. If anything from a tale remotely contradicts the article, the latter takes precedence.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Holy Yes but he wouldnt need more than one due to the level the Bag can seal

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Kep Yes, that is how we treat the tales here

 

[FateAlbane]

>>> A set of playing cards, alters fate, prevents war and death

>>> Instantly assumes that will prevent someone from mass-wiping and killing anybody else in the planet

>>> doesn't even matter for the coming back from BFR thing

Sure. Whatever you say. Guess everyone in SCP is immortal then and he comes back from BFR without evidence.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

>>> A set of playing cards, alters fate, preventis war and death
>>> Instantly assumes that will prevent someone from mass-wiping and killing anybody else in the planet

Sure. Whatever you say. Guess everyone in SCP is immortal then.

Uh.... I think that's non-sequitur

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Fate It can counter the Great Death whose whole powerset revolves around causing catastrophy so yes it would hold off Lavos' planet wiping

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

@Weekly

Yes, that is my point.

Fate posted information from the article.

You stated that it was incorrect due to a later tale.

We do not use contradictory tales.

There are then two options for what is stated in this tale:

• The information within it is contradictory to 1440's article. Therefore, the tale is not used.

• The information within it simply expands upon what is stated in 1440's article without contradicting anything. Therefore, what Fate posted is indeed correct.

 

[FateAlbane]

Not sure how that that translates to "I'll stop this guy when I have already been BFR'd to a random time period."

But again, sure. Whatever you say.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Azzy

The article is correct

The tale expands on it

I never meant the article is incorrect i meant that the description we have for 1440 on the wiki is outdated

Correct we dont use contradictory tales

Fate is still incorrect

 

[FateAlbane]

lel That argument without backing up.

"You're wrong and that's it!!"

100/10 debating right there.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Fate Its translates as "I'll prevent Lavos from wiping out the planet and if i get BFRed the Brothers can just bring me back"

 

[Kepekley23]

I never meant the article is incorrect i meant that the description we have for 1440 on the wiki is outdated

That description comes from the article, as I've repeated again & again.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Kep I know, it needs to be updated with the expanded information from the tales

For instance, the articles states that he travels in highly intricate patterns, while the tales explain WHY

 

[Kepekley23]

I agree heavily with Fate's arguments.

3 or 4 for 1440, 4 for Lavos so far.

 

[FateAlbane]

Without proper or conclusive evidence, again.

And then the person says *I* don't want a character to lose.

Welp, calling it a day. Have fun with the canon problems... Again...

 

[Kepekley23]

@Kep I know, it needs to be updated with the expanded information from the tales

The tales need to be updated in order to not contradict the source material, yes.

 

[MrKingOfNegativity]

I agree heavily with Fate's arguments.
3 or 4 for 682, 4 for Lavos so far.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Kep The tales dont contradict the source material, yes

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Fate at it again with the ignoring evidence

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

@Fate

Come back, husbanfu.

 

[Kepekley23]

Stop editing my posts after you quote them. OvO

 

[Kepekley23]

@Weekly

He merely doesn't agree with you.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Saying i didnt post any evidence when i very clearly did isnt simply disagreeing

 

[Yobo_Blue]

Can we keep this incessant arguing out of this thread?! This has spiraled into absurd insults and accusations along with a debate on accepted canonicity that should be in a CRT, not a versus battle. If this continues, this thread needs to be closed.

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

Everyone in this thread is gay. Ha, I have clearly laid waste to all your feeble arguments with my superior intellect.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

How does stating a fact invalidate my argument? OVO

 

[Kepekley23]

He doesn't agree with your evidence because it dealt with something impossible to prove, eg that the Brothers would bring him back.

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

Everyone in this thread is gay. Ha, I have clearly laid waste to all your feeble arguments with my superior intellect.

But you're in this thread wot

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

But you're in this thread wot

D I D I S T U T T E R

 

[Kepekley23]

You took a few micropicoterananozeptoattoseconds more to say the "Ha", so I'm afraid you did stutter. Sorry.

 

[FateAlbane]

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

Top tier meme from my favorite animu, Crying Seagulls: Little Girls Murdering Each Other.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

I think this may need to be closed