Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
Not for long it won't.If the nonduality is being accepted, i think yes
Because i think it same like BDE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not for long it won't.If the nonduality is being accepted, i think yes
Because i think it same like BDE
Bruh... i say completely transcendence. I know transcendence something by default is just brought you to 1 level of resistenceTranscendence isn't even that impressive, because you only transcend things up to the level you've shown. The lack of something is completely disconnected from dimensionality.
However, if you lack something, it can't be manipulated. End of story. A transcendent being's mind still exists, albeit on a higher plane, so it can still be manipulated. A being who lacks a mind simply doesn't have one to manipulate to begin with.
Of course there will be always another layer above, but it will be higher degree of ability. NEP 2 is completely lack of nonexistence, so any level of NEP 1 cannot reach it, but it not mean NEP 2 cannot have layer"Complete transcendence" is horseshit. There will always be another layer above where you are; There are infinite layers above 1-A, and high 1-A, and tier 0, so there will never come a point where you are totally immune to fuckery from higher layers. The tiering system, by design, does not have an upper limit, and will always extend infinitely upwards.
So your own standards still wouldn't be immunity, because they can still be bound to higher layers. Got it.Of course there will be always another layer above, but it will be higher degree of ability. NEP 2 is completely lack of nonexistence, so any level of NEP 1 cannot reach it, but it not mean NEP 2 cannot have layer
The complete transcendence in here i mean just for atribute in it normal nature
Not a power of character, because without any further explanation lack of something just yeah not have something not cannot have something. Why even we give a character more power when he do is common sense (if it not have something just make it have something), we not give atreus a more power because added soul to garmI disagree with what is being proposed. From what I understand, the main concern here is that a character that lacks a soul, for example, can be bound to a soul by another one. I believe that this should be considered more a power of the character that is able to bound the soul to a soulless being rather than a weakness of the latter.
The main difference between Type 1 and Type 2 is that Type 1 can be bound to the aspect that they lack, while the Type 2 can't, which would make the second stronger than the first. However, I disagree. It's not like Type 2 is "more lacking" than Type 1, it simply resists being bound to the aspect that they lacks, which would simply gives him a resistence to being "bound" to, for example, a soul. I don't see any reason as to why Type 2 should be any stronger Immunity than Type 1, since they both lacks an aspect in the same way.
And in general, I don't think there would be many characters that would qualify for Type 2, since it's an extremely specific case.
Most of NEP 2 is not just lack of but also predecing and opposing or refuse the existence it self, make it impossible for add existence to it, it not like NEP 1. And yeah it lack of existence and nonexistence
Idealistic Nonexistence: The character doesn't exist in a sense further beyond conventional nonexistence. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence. Characters of this type often have some low degree of Transduality due to their lack of binary existence. Characters of this type have to behave at least as nonexistent as those with Material Nonexistence, but might display even further showings such as preceding or opposing existence.
Higher layer than what they complete transcendence of? Yes of courseSo your own standards still wouldn't be immunity, because they can still be bound to higher layers. Got it.
I don't agree. Bounding a soulless being to a soul should be a specific (and very useful) application of Soul Manipulation, and a being that is impossible to be bound to a soul should have resistence to that specific type of Soul Manipulation.Not a power of character, because without any further explanation lack of something just yeah not have something not cannot have something. Why even we give a character more power when he do is common sense (if it not have something just make it have something), we not give atreus a more power because added soul to garm
It is common sense that if it lack of something or not have something it mean yeah that just not have that, you just have to add something to it. And yeah we not give any stronger or specific power to character that can added something to character that lack of it (maybe creation, but it just for create part not the added part)I don't agree. Bounding a soulless being to a soul should be a specific (and very useful) application of Soul Manipulation, and a being that is impossible to be bound to a soul should have resistence to that specific type of Soul Manipulation.
What the **** are you talking about?Higher layer than what they complete transcendence of? Yes of course
Just a higher layer of normal ability, no. Even if it infinite^infinite^infinite until infinite layer
A think he is trying to say thisWhat the **** are you talking about?
It might be common sense, but it's not something that any character can do. Someone that can manipulate soul would never be able to bound a soulless being to a soul, unless they have the feat to do so. It's not a stronger application of Soul Manipulation, it's just a specific use of that ability, in the same way abilities like Soul Absorption, Soul Removal, Soul Destruction, ecc... Are specific application of Soul Manipulation. We do this with any ability, someone that can resist having they soul removed doesn't mean they resists their souls being destroyed, and in this case only because a character doesn't have a soul doesn't mean that a soul can't be added to them throught this specific usage of Soul Manipulation. A character that can't be bound to a soul would have resistence to that specific type of Soul Manipulation.It is common sense that if it lack of something or not have something it mean yeah that just not have that, you just have to add something to it. And yeah we not give any stronger or specific power to character that can added something to character that lack of it (maybe creation, but it just for create part not the added part)
Yeah, I know that much. But they still aren't immune to hax from a higher dimension.A think he is trying to say this
A being is completely transcendent (over the dimension they have shown transcendence over) over x ability
Said being can't be effect by x ability even if x ability is infinitely layered in potency
I would argue that you'd have to give an example of a souless being being soul haxxed because by the very nature of being souless, there isn't anything to manipulate with a character so it's not possible.I haven’t read much of this thread after the op. But I don’t think lacking something should be straight immunity no matter what. This is fiction, soul haxing a soulless creature can absolutely happen. Would it be incredibly stupid, absolutely, but it can totally happen.
Edit: Seriously, do you know how many completely inorganic characters (like straight rocks) have been poisoned in fiction. It’s hilariously common.
Oh I see, your confused on the part with Fixxed agreeing with you they aren't immune to hax from a higher dimension, but they can are still can be "immune". I think what Fixxed is referring to in his comment, is the kind of "immunity" that pertains only over the dimension they "transcend" over, not immunity that implies tier 0 hax no matter how layered "times whatever" won't effect them.Yeah, I know that much. But they still aren't immune to hax from a higher dimension.
Sans : )I would argue that you'd have to give an example of a souless being being soul haxxed because by the very nature of being souless, there isn't anything to manipulate with a character so it's not possible.
Yeah, because neither is a state of "true immunity". If lacking something doesn't grant immunity because of an extreme hypothetical that 99% of the time doesn't apply in any context, then being "transcendent" definitely isn't immunity because of how it can be bypassed by literally any higher dimensional hax. No matter how you break it down, lacking a soul will always be a better defense than "transcending" anything, even though I know VS debaters loooove using transcend as a buzzword.Oh I see, your confused on the part with Fixxed agreeing with you they aren't immune to hax from a higher dimension, but they can are still be "immune". I think what Fixxed is referring to in his comment, is the kind of "immunity" that pertains only over the dimension they "transcend" over, not immunity that implies tier 0 hax no matter how layered "times whatever" won't effect them.
Well then that's a different problem (if you believe that) if you want to get that set straight here.Yeah, because neither is a state of "true immunity". If lacking something doesn't grant immunity because of an extreme hypothetical that 99% of the time doesn't apply in any context, then being "transcendent" definitely isn't immunity because of how it can be bypassed by literally any higher dimensional hax. No matter how you break it down, lacking a soul will always be a better defense than "transcending" anything, even though I know VS debaters loooove using transcend as a buzzword.
Translating in Fujiwara terms: never.eventually
I do recall there are characters that have this or atleast I've heard people say they can do this in vs matches.This thread makes no sense. You can't soul-hax a being that doesn't have a soul anymore than you can use biological manipulation to manipulate a pebble.
They'd be an exception, not the rule.I do recall there are characters that have this or atleast I've heard people say they can do this in vs matches.
Ok so that is accepted. Then maybe not in the profile, but maybe a foot note in the section of the Resistance page might be nice to add regard such a case where they can effect those that lack.They'd be an exception, not the rule.
Some character may have the ability to make 2 + 2 = 5.
But on profiles for other verses we're not going to put: "2 + 2 = 4 (Although sometimes it can equal 5 in other verses)"
I don't think this was OP's intention (the bolded part)They'd be an exception, not the rule.
Some character may have the ability to make 2 + 2 = 5.
But on profiles for other verses we're not going to put: "2 + 2 = 4 (Although sometimes it can equal 5 in other verses)"
Yeah that no what i mean in here, you cant soul hax beinf that not have soul of course, but you can added soul in him and then soul hax him, they just not have soul not cannot have soul, in this case they not fully unbound by what they lack ofThis thread makes no sense. You can't soul-hax a being that doesn't have a soul anymore than you can use biological manipulation to manipulate a pebble.
Yeah that mean it not making garm or the being that lack of something not fully unbound or independent or immune from the atribute, because he can still bound by something they immune ofThis thread is pointless. Garm as he is naturally is still immune to soul/mind manipulation due to lacking it entirely. If he's given a soul then he's no longer a character that lacks said aspects of his being.
At most, I'd just point out that this can happen in the Weakness section of a character but even then, it should be intuitive that you can overcome a character's lack of something by making it so that they have it.
Yeah that no what i mean in here, you cant soul hax beinf that not have soul of course, but you can added soul in him and then soul hax him, they just not have soul not cannot have soul, in this case they not fully unbound by what they lack of
Yeah that mean it not making garm or the being that lack of something not fully unbound or independent or immune from the atribute, because he can still bound by something they immune of
For the water analogy, I differ; it doesn't fully apply to the concept of immunity. Immunity, in the context of resistances or abilities, refers to a state where a character is completely unaffected by a specific ability or manipulation. It implies that the character possesses an absolute defense or inherent quality that prevents the ability from affecting them in any way. If we were to draw a parallel to immunity, it would mean that the glass has an inherent property that prevents it from ever being able to hold or contain water, regardless of external forces. It's not a matter of temporarily lacking water; it's a fundamental characteristic of the glass itself.
That's such a niche situation though that I don't think it belongs on our profiles.Yeah that no what i mean in here, you cant soul hax beinf that not have soul of course, but you can added soul in him and then soul hax him, they just not have soul not cannot have soul, in this case they not fully unbound by what they lack of
In fact by default lacking something not refuse the ability from affecting them in any way, that mean not completely unbound by the thing they lack of. Yeah if that glass have further explanation about refuse the water entirely, because it just not have water in it not cannot have water. The problem is they even cannot resist a additional of the atribute that they lacking,For the water analogy, I differ; it doesn't fully apply to the concept of immunity. Immunity, in the context of resistances or abilities, refers to a state where a character is completely unaffected by a specific ability or manipulation. It implies that the character possesses an absolute defense or inherent quality that prevents the ability from affecting them in any way. If we were to draw a parallel to immunity, it would mean that the glass has an inherent property that prevents it from ever being able to hold or contain water, regardless of external forces. It's not a matter of temporarily lacking water; it's a fundamental characteristic of the glass itself.
Well it common sense not a niche situation at all, if you not have something for being manipulate just make you have something, i think thats what poeple and author will think if they write story and in this situationThat's such a niche situation though that I don't think it belongs on our profiles.
This does not actually contradict the concept of immunity. Immunity can always be circumvented, and this technique represents one of those ways.If you directly manipulate what they lacking of, it will not affect them, but it will be different if you forced/added the atribute on them and then affect them.
Incorrect, this does not align with the definition of immunity. To make such an assumption would be highly unfounded.Yeah it not completely unaffected or prevent the ability from affecting them in any wah right
This aspect is neither encompassed within the definition of immunity, nor does it bear a direct correlation to it.The problem is they even cannot resist a additional of the atribute that they lacking,