Immortality neg via EE

[Quangotjokes]

If a character can erase someone conceptually but in the process absorb their potential to exist. Would that negate their immortality entirely? Instead of just negating the regeneration?

Context: The Devourer can uncreate, beings, concepts, histories and more and make it so that they’ve never existed in the first place. The released potential is absorbed into the uncreator, hence the title “Devourer. Which means the potential they had to return from being erased if they could originally is gone/ absorbed.

 

[Quangotjokes]

Bump

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Aside from Types 3, 8 & 9, no form of immortality prevents erasure from existence. Even then, without Godly Regeneration, it doesn't matter.

Therefore, it does not negate their immortality, but their immortality does not prevent them from being erased either—unless immortality within the verse explicitly grants resistance to existence erasure.

 

[Quangotjokes]

Aside from Types 3, 8 & 9, no form of immortality prevents erasure from existence. Even then, without Godly Regeneration, it doesn't matter.

Therefore, it does not negate their immortality, but their immortality does not prevent them from being erased either—unless immortality within the verse explicitly grants resistance to existence erasure.

I guess that’s fair, and no it doesn’t. I figured since it absorbs their potential it would negate their potential even if they’ve come back from conceptual erasure before.

 

[Vietthai96]

no, at best it would be negation of immortality type 3, 4, 8, 9. possibly one, two or all of these types depending on contexts, at worst it is just EE plus power absorption