Immeasurable Speed Question

[Stefano4444]

Travelling between timelines count as a Immeasurable Speed feat, due of them be separated space-times.

Wouldn't that means that the same feat its valid if we apply to different universes that have been prove to be separated space-times?

 

[PrinceofPein]

Travelling between timelines count as a Immeasurable Speed feat, due of them be separated space-times.

It does not
Traveling through time via physical movement does.

Wouldn't that means that the same feat its valid if we apply to different universes that have been prove to be separated space-times?

If you can physically travel through the universes, they are not separate, so it will be an anti-feat.

 

[KLOL506]

It does not
Traveling through time via physical movement does.

FTFY

 

[Stefano4444]

It does not
Traveling through speed via physical movement does.

I was talking about physical movement.

 

[Stefano4444]

If you can physically travel through the universes, they are not separate

Possibly, but if the evidence about be separated space-times its still solid and plenty i don't think that single event its enough to disprove the establish cosmology.

It would make more senses to just assume that the feat in questione it legit, although this could still be consider an outlier.

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

Traveling between other space-times/universes isn't treated as Immeasurable speed. It's physical movement through time that counts

 

[PrinceofPein]

I was talking about physical movement

Possibly, but if the evidence about be separated space-times its still solid and plenty i don't think that single event its enough to disprove the establish cosmology.

It would make more senses to just assume that the feat in questione it legit, although this could still be consider an outlier.

We have never treated such as immeasurable speed.

 

[Andika_CL_atmadja]

It does not
Traveling through time via physical movement does.

If you can physically travel through the universes, they are not separate, so it will be an anti-feat.

This is more like semantics. You can also physically travel to space A to space B even though they are separate.

 

[PrinceofPein]

This is more like semantics. You can also physically travel to space A to space B even though they are separate.

Physically not possibly and it is not semantics

 

[Andika_CL_atmadja]

Physically not possibly and it is not semantics

You should define what physical movement is, because it can greatly vary depending on context. Also able to move or fly freely to the past and the future are physical movement.

 

[PrinceofPein]

You should define what physical movement is, because it can greatly vary depending on context. Also able to move or fly freely to the past and the future are physical movement.

Anything done physically is physical movement, so yes flight and running to the past is physical movement.
And I really do not see how going to the past affect the discussion of flying from one universe to another.