• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

I Choose You- Pokemon Discussion Thread 2

This is a new one the old one died
This old one?

Which had received multiple messages yesterday?

Also, if you want to promote Versus Threads, the relevant 'verse's discussion threads work, OR https://vsbattles.com/threads/versus-discussion-promotion-thread.109522/page-8

The Versus Discussion Promotion Thread also received multiple messages yesterday, so I wouldn't call it dead, either.
 
I did this quick calc of counting the number of visible feathers on Ho-Oh and multiplying it by the AP of one feather and I got 6.50253E+15 Tons of TNT or High 6-A results
At the same time though, I found the calc to be rather screw-y, I tried to copy the exact method on my spreadsheet, and I instead got 7.71796513614550E+10 Tons of TNT or 6-C results, and I sure as hell have no idea as to how @Executor_N0 got the mass of 6.42910657e14 kg without the density used

And that's not mentioning the calc creator didn't convert from km to m
 
I did this quick calc of counting the number of visible feathers on Ho-Oh and multiplying it by the AP of one feather and I got 6.50253E+15 Tons of TNT or High 6-A results
At the same time though, I found the calc to be rather screw-y, I tried to copy the exact method on my spreadsheet, and I instead got 7.71796513614550E+10 Tons of TNT or 6-C results, and I sure as hell have no idea as to how @Executor_N0 got the mass of 6.42910657e14 kg without the density used

And that's not mentioning the calc creator didn't convert from km to m
Props to the calcing, but we have a Pokemon General Discussion Thread:


It may be worth it to repost your work there, if you please.
 
Back
Top