-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
how is Kirby 967.2 quadrillion times FTL
- Thread starter Vs_pro
- Start date
-
- Tags
- kirby (universe)
- 15,431
- 5,024
Long story.
Once he flew from his universe to another using his warp star, Cal did a calc for with the timeframe at 9 secs (here), the calc genius known as Lina Shields was ok with it, then timeframe was revalued at 3 secs (here) and a lot of profiles were made mentioning 967.2 quadrillion times FTL Kirby without a calc for it, then I decided to redo Cal's calc with the new timeframe (here) but Darkanine wasn't 100% ok with it and I forgot about it.
So... basically, Cal's calc and the timeframe of it being 3 secs was accepted, but the calc with that wasn't.
Once he flew from his universe to another using his warp star, Cal did a calc for with the timeframe at 9 secs (here), the calc genius known as Lina Shields was ok with it, then timeframe was revalued at 3 secs (here) and a lot of profiles were made mentioning 967.2 quadrillion times FTL Kirby without a calc for it, then I decided to redo Cal's calc with the new timeframe (here) but Darkanine wasn't 100% ok with it and I forgot about it.
So... basically, Cal's calc and the timeframe of it being 3 secs was accepted, but the calc with that wasn't.
Similar threads
