How do we rate 4-dimensional space?

[Iamunanimousinthat]

How does this site rate a verse where a universe has at least 4 dimensions of space instead of 3 dimensions?

It is said that our world is 3D + 1D (time). How do we quantify a verse where the universe is 4D + 1D (time)?

 

[Antoniofer]

Welp, someone that shift into the 4th dimension is essentially intangible, ignoring 3-D stuff in the same way we ignore 2-D stuff. Nothing much about that, it do not makes someone stronger, it were a revision about that but since it "cought up most of the staff by surprise" it was paused at the time.

 

[Iamunanimousinthat]

Okay I see.

What about destroying such a universe? Does it make Low 2-C still?

 

[JackJoyce]

You're talking about 5D characters. Compared to them all 3D characters are spatially flat. They can perceive past present and future simultaneously across an infinite 2-A multiverse

 

[Agnaa]

Destroying a 4D universe, but not the time component, would yield Low 2-C.

A verse with 4D space would lie in the 4D AP range right now, but may be downgraded in the future.

 

[JackJoyce]

Destroying a 4D universe, but not the time component, would yield Low 2-C.

A verse with 4D space would lie in the 4D AP range right now, but may be downgraded in the future.

4 dimensions + time. Isn't he talking about 5-D space? Destroying any 5D structure would qualify for High 2-A

 

[Agnaa]

That's why I said "Destroying a 4-D universe, but not the time component, would yield Low 2-C"

 

[JackJoyce]

Destroying 4-D universe (3 spatial + 1 temporal dimension). Yes that's Low 2-C

 

[Iamunanimousinthat]

The universe in question has 4 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension.

 

[Agnaa]

Destroying the 4 spatial dimensions and the 1 time dimension would be High 2-A.

 

[Iamunanimousinthat]

Oh wow. I was thinking more on the line of being infinitely above Low 2-C but not 2-C. That might be too much of a rating.

 

[Agnaa]

It's High 2-A because it would be a 5D feat.

 

[Antoniofer]

Is 3 + 1 D is Low 2-C, I guess 4 + 1 D would be 2-C, three dimension with and additional space one but yet one temporal one, not sure, personally never liked that the tiering system is based in coordinates. But I'm almost certainly sure is not High 2-A, someone that shift into the 4D wouldn't certainly gain that tier (and according to the incoming revision, it woukdn't nothing at all).

 

[Agnaa]

Is 3 + 1 D is Low 2-C, I guess 4 + 1 D would be 2-C, three dimension with and additional space one but yet one temporal one, not sure, personally never liked that the tiering system is based in coordinates. But I'm almost certainly sure is not High 2-A, someone that shift into the 4D wouldn't certainly gain that tier (and according to the incoming revision, it woukdn't nothing at all).

This is about destroying a universe with 4 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension. Destroying a 5D construct is High 2-A.

 

[JackJoyce]

Except there's no 4th spatial dimension in a 2-A multiverse. 2-C characters are those who can breach the distance between universes along a 5-dimensional axis. Their geometrical size is still 0 compared to a 5-D character.

 

[Agnaa]

That is true. But the feat's still 5D.

If you destroy 5 dimensions, that is 5-dimensional.

It's not the literal exact same thing as transcending an infinite 2-A timeline, but no two tier 2 feats in fiction are ever the same. We equalize similar enough ones to make them easier to work with.

 

[Andytrenom]

If 3+1D is low 2-C

Then 4+1D will be high 2-A following convention

 

[JackJoyce]

I was replying to Antoniofer