- 1,702
- 594
I remember. What it resulted in was staff getting defensive and it lead to just slightly altering the staff application pages. Literally NOTHING came out of that. Keep in mind, I still have an acausality thread for acheron and it's about to be 3 months. Staff changed their mind like 3-4 times, gave me a bunch of neutral votes and they won't come back one last time to clarify what i am meant to doYou guys wanna know the genuine worst part?
If I recall correctly, a while ago, there was a staff discussion thread meant to address the issue of many verses that were neglected/overlooked by staff, aiming to actually point out how the way things are isn't really working out too well for them, and at least trying to come up with ways to alleviate this...
... Buuut instead of even trying to come to a real compromise, since it was a staff thread, it ended up pivoting to, surprise surprise, catering to popular verses and mostly ignoring the original purpose of said thread. (Not to blame or hate on any of the staff but that's just sorta the way things went from my pov)
To be blunt, the chance of thread actively wanting to involve themselves in some crt's is lower than the chance of a Kangaroo Pathstrider kicking down your door![]()
Like there's REALLY simple to solve this btw. They can just appoint verse-specific staff from the community that are in good standing and make some rules about it so there's no absurd favouritism or something.