- 3,747
- 901
Just out of curiosity, what is the highest yield a planetary storm could possibly achieve?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Highest Storm calc
- Thread starter TeenAngel101
- Start date
- 6,594
- 1,710
Depends. I made a calc for a fanmade character doing it in o e second, and got just under large planet.
- 3,298
- 370
- 10,687
- 6,335
It hasn't been calced yet, but theirs a feat in Power Rangers where the Pink Ranger dissipates a planet wide storm (and I think the planet was supposed to be as big as Saturn or something). That could yield insane results.
- 8,438
- 3,293
All depends on the speed honestly. Taking several hours to blow away a storm? Reasonable results. Blow it away in like 2 seconds? '''Brace for impact'''
- 3,298
- 370
Jesus power rangers has ridiculous feats. My childhood has justified power rangers wank, it seems.Darkanine said:
- 10,687
- 6,335
One thing I love about Toku shows like Power Rangers and Sentai is just how nonchalant they are about big feats. For example, Sledge and his minion getting in a shouting match about how many galaxies they've destroyed.
Anywho. Apparently theirs a 5-A Storm in Godzilla somewhere but it's been recalculated at much lower values.
Anywho. Apparently theirs a 5-A Storm in Godzilla somewhere but it's been recalculated at much lower values.
- 3,298
- 370
You know you are a villain of the year when you say "We've all destroyed galaxies."Darkanine said:
- 3,298
- 370
Although for the the answer too the above, I think you can probably yield high end 5-A with KE based on the mass of earths atmosphere + relativistic speeds.
- 10,394
- 3,348
The big bads of Doubutsu Sentai Zyuohger literally, and I do mean literally, have a game about who can destroy the most planets between them.Darkanine said:
- 10,687
- 6,335
Best part is "all" refers to his henchme.
Total mass of the Atmosphere is 5.1480 * 10^18 kg. Lets say it moves at 10%.
5.148e+18 * 0.5 * 2.998e+7^2 = 2.3135122e+33 J
552 Zettatons
Now lets say it moves at 90%c
Relativistic KE yields 5.963e+35 J
142.5 Yottatons
So it takes a lot to get past 5-B, I guess.
Total mass of the Atmosphere is 5.1480 * 10^18 kg. Lets say it moves at 10%.
5.148e+18 * 0.5 * 2.998e+7^2 = 2.3135122e+33 J
552 Zettatons
Now lets say it moves at 90%c
Relativistic KE yields 5.963e+35 J
142.5 Yottatons
So it takes a lot to get past 5-B, I guess.
- 10,394
- 3,348
I know a storm feat in Wizard101 where a guy was going to create eternal winter over the entire galaxy.
- 3,298
- 370
What if the planet is five times as big as earth with the same atmospheric density of earth and it moves at the same speed?Darkanine said:
- 3,747
- 901
- Thread starter
- #18
Btw, I remember destroying the Ozone layer is 6-C, but does anyone know how much it takes to destroy the entire atmosphere? I don't remember what series it's from, but there was a guy who could destroy Earth's atmosphere with his body heat.
- 10,394
- 3,348
@Teen
The Fantastic Four movies? Lol.
The Fantastic Four movies? Lol.
- 3,298
- 370
I know lifting the atmosphere is 12.4 gigatons.TeenAngel101 said:
Assuming mass and heating it up, it would probably yield no more then like, Low 6-B results.
I have a calc where someone heated up the atmosphere, it yielded about these results.
- 3,747
- 901
- Thread starter
- #21
@Ever Oh yeah, I guess it's High 6-A.
Any idea what the yield is exactly, though?
Any idea what the yield is exactly, though?
- 8,438
- 3,293
Snow Miser is 6-B for being able to drastically lower the atmosphere's temperature.
- 3,747
- 901
- Thread starter
- #23
Apparently destroying it is High 6-A according to the Fox-tastic Four. I'm just wondering what the exact yield is.
- 8,438
- 3,293
Without knowing what it would do to the planet getting a value is completely impossible.
- 10,394
- 3,348
The quote is something along the lines of setting fire to the atmosphere and killing all life on the planet.
That's the most we get.
That's the most we get.
- 4,652
- 1,328
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:ArbitraryNumbers/Standard_Storm_calc
I've answered this on my blog. I doubt anybody on this wiki performed the feat, but if you scroll down to the bottom you'll find a table using areas the storm covers, provided that there isn't a proper time frame given.
Provided that there isn't a proper timeframe given for the storm's creation, and assuming that the storm cloud itself is 30,000 ft tall with an area equivalent to that of Earth's entire surface area, highest you could get, is 5.31e+19 joules, or 12.7 Gigatons of TNT - Island level.
I've answered this on my blog. I doubt anybody on this wiki performed the feat, but if you scroll down to the bottom you'll find a table using areas the storm covers, provided that there isn't a proper time frame given.
Provided that there isn't a proper timeframe given for the storm's creation, and assuming that the storm cloud itself is 30,000 ft tall with an area equivalent to that of Earth's entire surface area, highest you could get, is 5.31e+19 joules, or 12.7 Gigatons of TNT - Island level.
- 3,298
- 370
That is laughably close to Percy's feat of lifting the sky---ArbitraryNumbers said:
- 10,687
- 6,335
Wouldn't using standard Wattage yield higher results? Vortex and Storm both made storms that covered the entire area of the world and yielded around 110~ Gigatons.
- 4,652
- 1,328
Where does the standard wattage come from?
- 4,652
- 1,328
I see the problem. My blog only used storms that are 30,000 feet tall.
The calculation in this forum threadassumes heights of 15 km.
So most of the values in my storm blog are huge lowballs.
The calculation in this forum threadassumes heights of 15 km.
So most of the values in my storm blog are huge lowballs.
- 3,298
- 370
Because I am assuming these are values you get in reality and not just pulled from nowhere, right?ArbitraryNumbers said:
Although if a cloud was 15 km tall, I would consider moving to another planet lol.
- 4,652
- 1,328
Well apparently according to the guy in the thread, 15 km in height is standard for the midlatitudes.
- 4,652
- 1,328
Okay false alarm.
The guy used a different cloud density than the one we use. Not only that by 30,000 ft isn't too far off from 15 km. Plus he somehow got 1.687 terajoules from multiplying (1.125*10^12) * 1500, where the actual result would only be 1.6875e+15.
The guy used a different cloud density than the one we use. Not only that by 30,000 ft isn't too far off from 15 km. Plus he somehow got 1.687 terajoules from multiplying (1.125*10^12) * 1500, where the actual result would only be 1.6875e+15.
- 3,298
- 370
Damn AN, back at it again with is your realism lul.ArbitraryNumbers said:
So the general idea is at best storms with CAPE are tier High 6-C.
Funny with someone with planetary range can have shitty ap lul.
- 4,652
- 1,328
The dude actually didn't make a mistake. I just misinterpreted "1.687 terajoules" as "1.687 Teratons of TNT".
- 3,298
- 370
I didnt mean to make it sound like he made a mistake lul.ArbitraryNumbers said:
I just knew your attention to detail, to put it nicely is absurd lul.
I still stand by someone who is planetary range has only tier 6 ap.
Like, wow.
