• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

HE'S BACKKKK - Hazbin Hotel downgrades

Vzearr

He/Him
VS Battles
Content Moderator
2,096
1,839

Calculation:​

The Problem:

There is no evidence that Robo Fizz does a full 360 degree spin, it's a baseless assumption.​

Calculation:​

The Problem:

This is wrong because they assume the dome is split equally in to 2. This can be proven with pixel scaling, however, the problem here is that the dome lost some of it's width (being split in two), an unquantifiable amount of width, which is why I believe something like using the frame count would be better.​

Calculation:​

The Problem:

Where is the proof it happens in 1 frame?​
 

Calculation:​

The Problem:

There is no evidence that Robo Fizz does a full 360 degree spin, it's a baseless assumption.​
Do I honestly need to rehash my arguments from last time? But yes, this being the only calc in that tier is bad and new feats should be found to replace it or reinforce it... which can be done by someone else cause I am not a CGM and frankly I have other verses that need more tending to than Hazbin

Calculation:​

The Problem:

This is wrong because they assume the dome is split equally in to 2. This can be proven with pixel scaling, however, the problem here is that the dome lost some of it's width (being split in two), an unquantifiable amount of width, which is why I believe something like using the frame count would be better.​

Calculation:​

The Problem:

Where is the proof it happens in 1 frame?​
These are probably fine though, I'll throw my agree hat into this.
 
Downgrades cannot pass in a Calc Group Thread, just to make this clear. You'll have to make a CRT afterward and get staff approval there after this one is finished.

However, I agree with the OP and the calculations are not usable.

While I do have other idea for calculations, especially for speed, I'm far too disinterested and busy with other verses to actually try.
 
That doesn't necessarily mean he span 360 degrees within the distance he moved.
It didn't he'd be looking closer to Sonic(when he isnt spindashing) rather than just a blur...

However, you have visible colors, so now that I think about it, you could calculate the exact amount of degrees he moved, and that would be a far more acceptable alternative, yeah?
 
However, you have visible colors, so now that I think about it, you could calculate the exact amount of degrees he moved, and that would be a far more acceptable alternative, yeah?
That is what I suggested in my old thread, but now I realise that the colours aren't consistent.
 
Downgrades cannot pass in a Calc Group Thread, just to make this clear. You'll have to make a CRT afterward and get staff approval there after this one is finished.

However, I agree with the OP and the calculations are not usable.

While I do have other idea for calculations, especially for speed, I'm far too disinterested and busy with other verses to actually try.
@Agnaa is this true? Apologies for the tag, you're the only supermod online currently.

The reason why I'm contesting it is because I've seen calc group threads passed without a crt. Perhaps I'm wrong though.
 
Calc Group Discussion threads can determine the legitimacy of calcs. If there's any ensuing dispute about where exactly characters should land, a CRT will be necessary.
If there exist conflicting accepted calculations for the same feat, the calc group members should discuss which ones that are most reliable to use in their own forum. The calc group is free to ask for relevant information from reliable members, by using the knowledgeable members list for verses or the associated verse page list of supporters. After a decision has been reached, and the most reliable calculations have been selected, a discussion should be started in the content revision forum to decide which characters that should scale to the feats.
If there's no controversy, we can shortcut that process a little bit, tho.
 
Adams beam speed is not even being used, its not accepted why are we trying to downgrade something that is not accepted

Disagree on Robo-Fizz argument, he pretty much was doing a 360
 
Bump. Btw, do we know where the characters would scale if this thread gets passed?
 
Back
Top