Hashirama Speed Downgrade

[AppleLord]

Hashirama is Mach 234 based on Calc Stacking. This downgrade may affect other characters. The Bijuudama should be scale on its own and not base on another calc. The other calc is not even available.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:RavenSupreme/Hashirama_speed_revision

 

[LlamaGod1411]

Calc stacking why? Not really Hashi's strongest scaling either.

And pretty sure I've seen higher mach calcs recently with not many disagreeing. It is just that Naruto revisions are going on at the moment.

 

[Burning_Full_Fingers]

Pain is Mach 380 for crossing a Chibaku Tensei crater or something. I have heard of Mach 400 and something Bijuudama but I've never seen the calc.

 

[AppleLord]

Yeah, Hashirama needs a different calc if possible with the same feat. This calc is based on the assumption that the Bijuudama moves at the same speed as the one that was calculated at Mach 234.

 

[LlamaGod1411]

Yea but the feat is probably irrelevant at this point since there's a higher value.

 

[Antvasima]

Gwynbleiddd will handle a Naruto verse revision during this summer.

 

[Dariel_Senju]

This Downgrade is impossible to proceed, most of Naruto's characters are currently MHS-rated and there are calculations that show that it is actually MHS +. Characters like Tsunade or Sakura are also MHS, by simple powerscaling Hashirama is MHS. And yes, Bijudada is as fast as the Rasen Shuriken as it has been seen in the manga itself both going at the same speed.

 

[Burning_Full_Fingers]

Oh well, I already removed the calculation from Hashirama's page.

 

[AppleLord]

In the meantime scale him to Edo Madara.

 

[Antvasima]

@Burning Full Fingers

Please avoid any Naruto or Bleach statistics changes until after Gwynbleiddd has performed his revisions. Thank you.

 

[Burning_Full_Fingers]

He's still at MHS, I just removed the calculation as a justification for his rating since it's calc stacking.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.

 

[AppleLord]

Thank you @BurningFullFingers.

Yu can close this thread now @Antvasima, the subject has been solve.