- 911
- 294
Don’t you have 4 staff approvals? (or 3, I don’t remember if Content Moderators count)Smth
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t you have 4 staff approvals? (or 3, I don’t remember if Content Moderators count)Smth
Yes, but 48 hours must pass 1st.Don’t you have 4 staff approvals? (or 3, I don’t remember if Content Moderators count)
Actually... you're right on this one.
I've checked the feat multiple times, and Dipper does not exactly "move" along the beam. However his eyes can still move, so I guess a calc on it will suffice?
I'll wait for @Jason_Courne to make an answer to this before using it, but yeah, this should go. Thus they shall be simply be downscaled from Ford's 0.36c feat.
Ya, I mean that.Honestly, I think the feat should be fine to use given how Dipper's eyes still move in tandem with the laser.
YesYa, I mean that.
Tho you mean the whole "fall" part too?
Ducking my arguments and acting ignorant sure is a nice way of debating. Unfortunately it doesn't refute anything. In your own videos the characters are seen percieving the "lasers" way before the lasers reached them which means that the light bouncing off those lasers blitzed said lasers and entered the characters' retinas. Address this and don't duck."Actual science" bro I am the one who gave proofs and links.
Saying it's across all of media does not change the fact I've provided many examples that happen in GF of the characters failing to react to things that are nowhere near relativistic. Disprove them.You didn't list me any true anti feat, only random stuff that is generally wanked across all of media, not just GF.
Doesn't change the existence of all the anti-feats for GF, which outnumber your 4 "feats". Stop yapping about authors, which is ironically something you yourself complained about.Authors can be ignorant on how powerful they make the characters. The authors of Archie Sonic don't believe him being above Wall level, for instance.
I never said it's slower because the characters dodge it. The fact that several responses in a row you have to blatantly lie about my arguments is laughable stuff.Your only argument is "that light is slower than light because these characters can dodge it", also you ignored that's not a criteria that'd make the light dodging invalid on the page.
The characters are just that fastDucking my arguments and acting ignorant sure is a nice way of debating. Unfortunately it doesn't refute anything. In your own videos the characters are seen percieving the "lasers" way before the lasers reached them which means that the light bouncing off those lasers blitzed said lasers and entered the characters' retinas. Address this and don't duck.
I don't need to. That's just bad writing that happens any time due to authors generally not being aware that these things would be mundane for these characters.Saying it's across all of media does not change the fact I've provided many examples that happen in GF of the characters failing to react to things that are nowhere near relativistic. Disprove them.
You've never mentioned even a single actual anti feat, just some random cases that... you didn't even cite? Plus I am not yapping, I am only telling this mindset of yours is foolish because you can argue this for literally any verse.Doesn't change the existence of all the anti-feats for GF, which outnumber your 4 "feats". Stop yapping about authors, which is ironically something you yourself complained about.
I never said it's slower because the characters dodge it. The fact that several responses in a row you have to blatantly lie about my arguments is laughable stuff.
Why are you the one actually lying?Even the very scene is self-contradictory, as they are able to SEE the lasers or whatever else coming, which'd require the light bouncing off said laser to reach their retinas WAY before the lasers themselves.
Actually, @Psychomaster35 did kinda explain above.The arguments against the Relativistic calcs are genuinely just arguments from incredulity with nothing to back them up. All the feats except the 2nd one should be fine, so an upgrade to 0.36c seems reasonable. There's clear consistency here
Honestly, I think the feat should be fine to use given how Dipper's eyes still move in tandem with the laser.
That doesn't really matter to me. The eye movement is not what's being calculated here, it's Dipper fallingActually, @Psychomaster35 did kinda explain above.
I'll try calculating that, in case it'll ultimately be agreed before the fall.That doesn't really matter to me. The eye movement is not what's being calculated here, it's Dipper falling
I wanna accuracy about numbers boy.Tbh 0.01c is not that much of a difference, let’s just stick with 0.36c calc