- 29
- 3
Is containing a 1-A+ hierarchy within it H1-A? And if not, does qualitatively transcending this 1-A+ encompassing structure result in H1-A?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
H1-A
- Thread starter Coreinvsbw
- Start date
ROZAN-U
He/Him- 657
- 842
only with that context no
as per High 1-A definition ,yeah
1-A qualitatively transcends Non 1-A things so High 1-A would do the same to 1-A
Characters or objects who transcend 1-A characters in the same vein that 1-A characters transcend the rest of the system.
- 1,371
- 782
Now I might be wrong,but I feel like that would still just be 1-A+ just uncountable infinite layers into it.
1 layer into outer is already qualitative superiority over 1-A.
ROZAN-U
He/Him- 657
- 842
I don't think qualitatively superiority over 1-A would just be 1 layer https://cdn.**********.com/emojis/1116887678084993104.webp?size=80
since as per the page the level above 1-A works same way how higher dimensions/reality on Non 1-A level work.https://cdn.**********.com/emojis/1085389542061781043.webp?size=80
This tier can be extended into higher levels in the same vein as 1-C and 1-B. And should a character or object effect something equivalent to infinitely many of such levels
with qualitative superiority over 1-A you would be above the entire framework defining 1-A which should be High 1-A ,regardless of layers of 1-A present in the setting.https://cdn.**********.com/emojis/1100531360013230182.webp?size=80
- 1,371
- 782
Yeah I think that is just a misunderstanding on how it works,
As r>f is 1-A. Yet another r>f would just be 1 layer even though both of them would be equivalent.
another r>f would be the having superiority the same way a 1-A r>f has over the things lower than it,yet 2 r>f is just 1 layer into outer and not high outer.
There was something Here
Last edited:
- 313
- 112
Qualitatively transcending the hierarchy as in their difference or the act of going up, yeah, if its just an additional r>f nah
- 29
- 3
- Thread starter
- #7
By saying that, don't they mean that all extensions of 1-A ( 1-A+ ) will always be inferior to an H1-A structure, so not in the sense of having a simple superior quality in the same way as two structures in a 1-A hierarchy? To support the superior “algorithm” of an H1-A hierarchy.
- 29
- 3
- Thread starter
- #8
With a qualitative transcendence on 1-A I don't think you'd be in a different frame, what's considered an algorithm is what defines an entire hierarchy, the fact of transcending a 1-A reality doesn't necessarily show that you're operating on a totally different hierarchy, transcendence is precisely the same in the sense of operating on the same thing (an irreducibility to the physical elements of reality) whereas to consider a higher system you'd have to have an irreducibility that the structure could have with extensions in the qualitative system on which it can operate, a concept or anything with a defined quality that defines the entire hierarchy.
