• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Godzilla Tiering Upgrades

Status
Not open for further replies.
1,881
230
Shouldn't Divine
001
/Demon Godzila be Multiversal+ since he became God & created everything (the realm of infinite number of Universes)? And God Mountain & Hell God are also Multiversal+ by powerscaling and being considered equal to him.
 
Wrong God and no. Especially given that it would be massively inconsistent. God Mountain and Hell God being equal to a being who's canonically massively superior to them.
 
The real cal howard said:
Wrong God and no. Especially given that it would be massively inconsistent. God Mountain and Hell God being equal to a being who's canonically massively superior to them.
Who is "God-Kaiju" specifically referring to btw? When I saw "Kaiju," I thought it could be referring to Godzilla since that's the name of their species. Also, their God possibly could have an "at least" rating if it might be inconsistent.
 
We also have new regulations regarding Twitter replies that are unverified from the stories themselves.
 
Here they are:

"Regarding direct information from the author/creator of a character: We do not use statements that are phrased in an uncertain, uncaring, and/or unspecific manner, such as "Could be", "Maybe", "Probably", "Possibly" etcetera. Brief or vague answers to fan-questions via social media are also generally disregarded, whereas more elaborate explanations in serious interviews are usually considered more reliable.

When a statement from a character, guidebook, or even word of god contradicts what occurs in the series, they won't be used. For example, if an author says that a character from his work is incapable of shattering planets, even though it has destroyed galaxies on-screen, we will always go with the latter, rather than the former. The statement need to be consistent with what has been revealed within the fictional franchise itself. Otherwise, it will be considered invalid.

Author statements will only be accepted when they clarify what has been shown or implied in the series itself, and will be rejected when they contradict what has been shown to the audience. Statements that technically do not contradict anything shown in the series will still be rejected if there is no evidence that they are accurate."
 
Okay. I will close this thread then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top