This makes them completely unuseable in my view without outside verification.
Yeah, the language some of these scans use does sound very battle-board centric. But, "outside verification"? Marianne did confirm the Isle of Creation scan to be real in a Facebook convo. I have attached that in the post as well.
Meaning that anyone can verify that the above is true with an active source or existing article quote.
You attached a screenshot of a text confirmation with nothing to verify its authenticity. Quite literally anyone can do that. It's not good enough for verification.
Disregarding the fact these are fake as hell, just how high would the numbers be in theory.
The stacked layers of reality stuff would get you High 1-B. Debatably some of the Greek quotes would get you a similar result or Low 1-A.
Geez. The guy(s) who forged these seriously knew what he was doing then. And it's insane to see such amount of commitment and dedication going into forging these many fake scans, just so that the guy(s) can have their favourite fictional character(s) look powerful in V.S. battles debating.
I think you're being sarcastic here, but yes, people have gone out of their way to both fake and edit evidence before to win a debate or change something. It's happened before. Adding to this, why aren't their any other instances of these scans anywhere else? Why would they just be located here? They're millions of people who play GoW and some fraction of them are into lore like this, so why aren't there more examples of these?
Even if it was all legit, we still wouldn't use it. It's not backed in the games and it would be a massive cosmological outlier.
More or less.
