- 329
- 50
Why you asking me.Why must put it's Likely since that stuff is pretty solid
To this day, I’m tranna figure out, how that fits the definition of immeasurable
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why you asking me.Why must put it's Likely since that stuff is pretty solid
Just removed it. Also multiple dimensions overlapping each other stuff too.I can remove the Buddha justification since most people disapprove of it. It was just something that was in the original sandbox so I felt that it should be kept at least until more input, but most here don’t seem to like it.
Me too, I think they discussed whether 2-C or low 2-C is legit.Can someone give me a quick synopsis of what's being discussed? I just woke up, and now need to go to school, so I'd like to be up to date.
Can someone give me a quick synopsis of what's being discussed? I just woke up, and now need to go to school, so I'd like to be up to date.
Alright. I've read through the thread, and think all of this is generally applicable.
- we got the translations for the raws, likely 2-C should be applicable with it.
- the Buddha justification is going to be removed from the immeasurable lifting strength, but the rating is still gonna be kept the same.
- making new justification for the likely 2-C rating
From what I was told it's apparently a bit hard to calculate the Jichuk since it's not a conventional explosion. I asked DMUA if the rating for the feat was fine and he said it was but I think it just needs to be discussed if it scales to Mori as his final move.Alright. I've read through the thread, and think all of this is generally applicable.
I think once this is done, we just need to get a calculation for Jichuk, yes?
Actually if raw translation from @karma true. Then Mori should put at rated solid "2-C"
- we got the translations for the raws, likely 2-C should be applicable with it.
- the Buddha justification is going to be removed from the immeasurable lifting strength, but the rating is still gonna be kept the same.
- making new justification for the likely 2-C rating
Alright. I'm about to go to school, so, I'll check this later.From what I was told it's apparently a bit hard to calculate the Jichuk since it's not a conventional explosion. I asked DMUA if the rating for the feat was fine and he said it was but I think it just needs to be discussed if it scales to Mori as his final move.
4D justification abilities in not needed ini his profile, he is already has Higher-Dimensional Existence (4-D). It's just like 3D characters, do you think is really needed 3D justification abilities in their profile?
Yeah. If Mori 3D then his ability is smurf 4D, yeah justification is needed for that like Yhwach almighty.I told them before
Yhwach almighty one was unneeded, till now I have no idea which staff even approved it. The fact that justification already covers that seems unnecessary even to mention it. The range also mentions it. It is supererogatory.Yeah. If Mori 3D then his ability is smurf 4D, yeah justification is needed for that like Yhwach almighty.
Nope, vs battle standards don't assume all his abilities are 4D if he is HDE. Only feats counts.Would all of his abilities classify as 4D now that Mori has attained higher dimensional existence? Is that why specifying isn’t needed for certain abilities?
I was just doing it for clarities sake
Since Mori Existence is already 4D, so their hax is actually scaled to 4D. So justification 4D hax in his profile is must be removed. It's not needed.Would all of his abilities classify as 4D now that Mori has attained higher dimensional existence? Is that why specifying isn’t needed for certain abilities?
I was just doing it for clarities sake
It’s not a must.Since Mori Existence is already 4D, so their hax is actually scaled to 4D. So justification 4D hax in his profile is must be removed. It's not needed.
Why we must keep his 4D in his justification? If we use the same thing. Every 4D Characters profile in this Wiki should have 4D justification too.Guys, we're keeping the 4-D justification. It's not being removed.
Maybe they should? That's not an argument at all.Why we must keep his 4D in his justification? If we use the same thing. Every 4D Characters profile in this Wiki should have 4D justification too.
Who said this? Vs battle standards don't assume that.Since Mori Existence is already 4D, so their hax is actually scaled to 4D. So justification 4D hax in his profile is must be removed. It's not needed.
Just removed it now, is unneededI mean yeah? Every 4D character should have a 4D justification to it lol.
I just now. Idk these standard actually doesnt exist.Who said this? Vs battle standards don't assume that.
Dude don't edit the sandbox u asshole.Just removed it now, is unneeded
I don't edit that, i just suggest @Maitreya to remove itDude don't edit the sandbox u asshole.
Wow, just shock that standard actually never exist.No, the standards never assume each ability from 4D being is 4D. We have never done this.
Me personally now. wouldn’t let that slide.I don't edit that, i just suggest @Maitreya to remove it
Wow, just shock that standard actually never exist.I guess it's would be exist soon
Worst case scenario, if you allow it, there will be many profiles that will use the same format. Due to following Mori's profile.In this instance it was said that Mori’s abilities should naturally be 4D for the most part as he is an omnipresent higher dimensional entity that maintains the universe.
Either way though 4D is going to have better justification and more specification for it in the sandbox.
Even if the 4D specification isn’t “needed” it does nothing to harm the profile and can be used for clarity’s sake. At worst it just does nothing for the profile and at best it helps for understanding. So it won’t be removed.