• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Geralt Magic AP Upgrade

@Matthew Schroeder

Geralt is a human,he can easily be damaged by swords,he was almost killed by the pitchfork.

He is only wall level in durability (wich is already iffy) unlesse you can prove he is more durable.

Witchers can fight monsters only because of their great speed and reactions.
 
>Geralt is a human,he can easily be damaged by swords,he was almost killed by the pitchfork.

I mean, the same can be said by many other fictional characters. Naruto characters can be damaged by Kunai. Soul Calibur characters don't seem anymore superhuman than Geralt, but they range from Large Building to Island level. Being human and being hurt by normal weapons is a common thing in fiction. There may be other arguments to not count feats, but that is not a good argument. Not to mention being human is by no means an argument as many powerful fictional characters are human. Being human means nothing.
 
^The problem with Geralt is that Witchers were never shown or stated to be superior to humans physically(strength wise).

Geralt can easily be beaten by strong enough humans,he just has too much anti feats.
 
>Anti Feats

I fear the arguments that will begin because of that term...
 
You can joke around as much as you want.But you can not deny that Geralt can easily be killed by humans,wolves and other monsters both in game and in books.He wouldve been dead already if not his speed and reaction.
 
Hey man, I'm just using your logic. Hey admins, mind if I make a downgrade for wall level OP top tiers based on this? Let's throw Naruto in the mix too while we're at it. Gonna downgrade a bunch of verses now.
 
At the same time those characters have decent feat that put them at higher levels.

And what does Geralt have?Can you write down all his best durability and AP feats?
 
Well the question is that if he can tank hits from someone with good feats, that's a durability feat.
 
Naruto getting stabbed is not a good example to bring on '''any''' scenario even if Geralt being hurt by arrows is a nonsensical argument. It was literally one of the most PIS filled moments on fiction.
 
Kepekley23 said:
Naruto getting stabbed is not a good example to bring on any scenario even if Geralt being hurt by arrows is a nonsensical argument. It was literally one of the most PIS filled moments on fiction.
But I never brought up Naruto being stabbed. I said Naruto characters. Never brought up a specific example Kep.
 
Oof, nvm then. I'll crawl back into my cave then. And wait for Matt and the Anti-Feat war that is soon to come.
 
The term "anti feat" makes me think of a feat-hero and a feat-villain.
 
No it isn't. It means the antithesis to a feat. i.e. if you're saying Gerald is country level, all the times that completely normal peasants 'rmed with pitchforks can actually damage him are anti-feats.

I can't speak for others, but I am not saying "oh he gets damaged by swords and other weapons therefore he can't be country level" because I'm well aware that country level people can wield swords and other weapons.

What I am saying is that he still gets damaged by swords and other weapons of completely normal, non-supernatural, non-superhuman people. So unless it is being argued that the average soldier with a sword is country level in the witcher universe, Geralt being country level is incredible wank.
 
To be fair, we don't have 10-C dark souls because you can be hurt in ng+ by corpses with sticks. Country level being an outlier is one thing, but a lot of the time unless its shown in story fodder enemies hurting the protag is considered game mechanics. I'm apathetic towards Geralt's status btw.
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
The fact of the matter is that Geralt beats the Djinn in both the Games and the Books, albeit those are different Djinns and different Continuities.
Game Djinn creates a storm just by being summoned which instantly vanishes once it is defeated. Book Djinn can manipulate the weather as well, but also uproot mountains from the ground.
Darkanine said:
Almost certain the Djinn feat was the one calced at Country level. TTGL on OBD was the one who did the calc I think.
Dragonmasterxyz said:
Dragonmasterxyz said:
Here is a feat that can be calced that Geralt could scale to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTdpTECMetk

I hear that in the books he destroys a mountain. Gonna need a source for that tho.
Could we get this calced? I believe it also abides by our weather feat rules.
Kepekley23 said:
That's a High 6-A feat...
I'm seeing a lot of people bringing up Tier 6 feats that Geralt supposedly scales to.
 
Wokistan said:
To be fair, we don't have 10-C dark souls because you can be hurt in ng+ by corpses with sticks. Country level being an outlier is one thing, but a lot of the time unless its shown in story fodder enemies hurting the protag is considered game mechanics. I'm apathetic towards Geralt's status btw.
The difference here is that Geralt being hurt by normal people are actually plot-relevant events in the story. They aren't just in game
 
Being plot-relevant doesn't matter. There's a dragon bound by metal chains in a Skyrim quest which is hilariously inconsistent to their power levels elsewhere.
 
>Assumes I knew the feat was Tier 6 to begin with.

I quite obviously asked him to calc it and said that he "could" scale to it. I am not here arguing whether it is an outlier. I wanted the feat to be calced buddy.

Also, I ask. How many times during the plot is he hurt by such things? I am talking about non-superhumans btw.
 
If its magically done then it could be a case of the whole "glass cannon magician who has bad durability" trope again, but I'm not super familiar with this series.
 
I think this thread derailed a bit, also my notifications broke for this, IDK why.

I feel like anything higher than Tier 8, and you start hitting outlier territory with Geralt. While it's easy to joke that "Under that logic, Goku is bullet level kek", many of the counterexamples provided have a solid bunch of feats to back everything up, and most anti-feats I've seen mentioned here are outright outliers or just gags.

Geralt, even when he is serious, is rather outclassed by many of the stronger mages in Witcher, even so he usually takes them down in unconventional methods if he's aiming to kill them. Lile Monarch said, there is such a large quantity of anti-feats that it becomes shaky to support.
 
low end is an already established term.
 
I prefer the term Low-Ends and High-Ends.

Geralt being stabbed with a pitchfork is a hilarious Low-End. Geralt beating up the Djinn is a High-End.
 
I mean, portrayal of power is also something that needs to be taken into account.

The Dragonborn, as an example you used, is consistently stated to be able to kill Alduin/Dragons, and is constantly referred to as comparable to them, and ends of killing them constantly, so Low-Ends wouldn't need to be taken into account at the scale of people with pitchforks.

Geralt isn't stated to be anywhere near the likes of Djiin and Powerful Wizards. If I recall correctly, there's several statements going over how utterly outclassed he is by them. If anything, him taking them down is either due to low dura on the opponent's end, or is an outlier, IMO.
 
Portrayal of a character is the absolute worst argument you can use for determining their power.
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
Stop using the terms anti-feat. Use an actual word.
Please don't be childish. We all know what the term means. There's no need to find another word for it.
 
It's not being childish. It's that the term is an oxymoron with perfectly existing equivalents for it.
 
The Everlasting said:
Portrayal of a character is the absolute worst argument you can use for determining their power.
Might have came off wrong with that... I'm mostly referring to statements as well as how often the feats are preformed. That's true though, and I'm not going to pretend that it supports my argument.
 
Back
Top