I’m trying to justify how Mac can incon Theory but lose to Finn since I know that came under a lot of scrutiny here. Vs Debating isn’t a case where one result secures another most of the time, especially in extremely delicate results such as inconclusive matches. The difference between victory and incon can sometimes be as little as how fighting styles clash, especially in lower tiers such as these. In this case, it was. Mac is a boxer, he possesses a clean and efficient, but still rigid style. Finn is simply better equipped to deal with that kind of fighter than Theory is, as he has a move set that can very quickly overwhelm someone if they’re not careful. And as a nature of his high risk manoeuvres he has carrying momentum down to a science, with free flowing combos that lead the opponent straight to a deadly blow in a way that very, VERY few in WWE have in their move-set to the degree of Finn. He just naturally exploits Mac’s weaknesses in a fight like this on a level Theory can’t which is why Theory incons, but Finn wins