- 5,879
- 1,072
- Thread starter
- #121
Not lifting strength
@Antvasima I think it is fine to add the changes for the downgrades except for lifting strength
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not lifting strength
Can you and Glassman explain your arguments in easy to understand manners please?Not lifting strength
@Antvasima I think it is fine to add the changes for the downgrades except for lifting strength
Em, no. Lmao. The meteor is simply closer to the camera than the stars, that's why it appears to be so far away. If it was so far away, we won't be able to see it cause of size. Yes, me waving my hand across the sky is equivalent. My hand appears to go past numerous stars cause it's much closer to my eyes. Same with the meteor.@XXKINGXX69 The visuals show it, can you give a better argument instead of repeating the same thing? If you can’t then I don’t see the reason to leave this thread open as I’ve already addressed your points for the 12th time.
You literally admit they get amped with power, their Lifting strength would scale as a result given the Crystals are capable of doing that.
When the **** are the sprites remotely an argument? They are not accurate to what the actual size of a character is given you have Golbez tower over everyone in boss form but he’s in the same size as Fusoya when he’s a good guy.
@Da_Lunge_Fish What ******* argument is that? It’s literally in outer space and flies past numerous stars to crash into the planet. Your handwave is a massive false equivalence.
Deep space? Maybe. Nothing assumes it's actually as far as the stars thoughExcept that the clip 5 seconds prior you see a money shot of meteors coming from deep space with no visible sight, why does everyone seem to have a habit of ignoring this part?
We don't even see 'em flying. They just twinkle in the sky and then hit the opponentIt's been posted a million times in the thread, it's even in the OP.
Dude wtf. This is a genuinely bad argument you’re using and you’re also putting on that condescending, high and might mask for potential counter arguments. Nothing proves meteors fly past the star, they just appear as twinkles in the sky, that’s it. They just are closer to the camera, if they were light years away we wouldn’t see themOk so this is a troll comment, not gonna entertain this argument anymore.
It’s a matter of perspective anything coming from outer space would look that wayAnd what are the lights flying by the last meteor to you then? Not actual stars flying by? Because you still haven’t remotely proven it’s not actual stars being flown past.
Responding to it doesn't mean you've debunked it and you're right. Again, that is how natural heat and electricity works. We aren't about to give sub-atomic manipulation to every heat user. It doesn't matter if the ability is explained as "this guy can heat stuff" or "this guy can transfer energy to electrons in the form of heat", at the end of the day it is the same thing. The process not being explained doesn't mean it is following some other magical process that we are unaware of. As long as it is not mentioned, we assume the process is as per our understanding of science, which is the case here. I don't think there is anything else on this point to respond.I already addressed your Ice and Fire and Lightning argument, you didn’t respond to it at all and more people agreed with me in the end
I already explained it. See here how the stars move in the background when it is a closeup shot. If you're not getting that, then I don't know what to tell you.And how is it perspective only when you literally see it in space before it starts flying into the planet, with different light sources flying past Meteor on top of that.
I think some of the staff members present here, except yourself, are in agreement of removal or didn't say anything.A handful of people agreed with removing Immeasurable LS
You're the only staff member in against from what I can see. Efi and Matt also agreed on some other things, besides myself.the rest was not agreed upon to be removed at all.
Do you think that if you see something flying past these stars here, they're massively ftl+?@AKM sama Do you want to give an argument as to why it doesn’t make sense because you haven’t responded to my comments beyond “this is common”. With no proof.
I already addressed your Ice and Fire and Lightning argument, you didn’t respond to it at all and more people agreed with me in the end. And how is it perspective only when you literally see it in space before it starts flying into the planet, with different light sources flying past Meteor on top of that.
A handful of people agreed with removing Immeasurable LS, more and more people agreed with me in the end so that doesn’t really hold any water at this point.
The accepted change that everyone didn’t mind was Infinite Speed, that was already agreed upon, the rest was not agreed upon to be removed at all.
@Da_Lunge_Fish And what are the lights flying by the last meteor to you then? Not actual stars flying by? Because you still haven’t remotely proven it’s not actual stars being flown past.
I already explained it. See here how the stars move in the background when it is a closeup shot. If you're not getting that, then I don't know what to tell you.
These are both false equivalents by virtue of these are both circling an area or the earth's atmosphere which is an entirely different context than Meteor which is entering from Space.
Im not talking about the space station circling the globe. I'm talking about if you see something in outer space in the background hereThese are both false equivalents by virtue of these are both circling an area or the earth's atmosphere which is an entirely different context than Meteor which is entering from Space.
Which is again from the prospective of something that's encircling the planet, not entering it. 2 different contexts.Im not talking about the space station circling the globe. I'm talking about if you see something in outer space in the background here
Do you know anyone that does Ang sizing calcs?Unfortunately, I'm not very good with ang sizing calculations.
The first one is also people fighting at space. It's not a false equivalency, it's just an example to show perspective.These are both false equivalents by virtue of these are both circling an area or the earth's atmosphere which is an entirely different context than Meteor which is entering from Space.
Okay, I can see how that would work then. So just to make sure, through their spell, they are first increasing speed of the electrons, which ultimately produces heat? If that is the case, then I see no problem with it and I'd disagree with the OP.the process is explained, they project what’s in their mind onto reality, that’s one of the basic things about magic in final fantasy, this isn’t science shit where they’re following rules. They don’t transfer heat, they literally control the electrons of the target.
I am undecided about lifting strength matter, but I really do not see anything justifying omnipresence.literally only you and DDM mentioned anything about the LS, Eficiente only commented on omnipresence and he agreed with me in the end.
He is retired admin, his sense of judgment counts as much as an admin.Matthew is not a staff member anymore so he doesn’t remotely count.
I know a guy, lemme askDo you know anyone that does Ang sizing calcs?
I'm not even talking about the ISS circling the planet, please re read my commentWhich is again from the prospective of something that's encircling the planet, not entering it. 2 different contexts.
Then I am fine with them having it.Yes, that’s how the spell works, hell that’s how nearly any spell in final fantasy works given the extended lore.
I did. And I didn't understand how exactly he is one with the void.Did you read the arguments about how Enuo’s existence is one with the Void?
If this is the reason for him being one with the void, then this isn't sufficient. This just means he has some control over it. For example, some characters can make structures and dimensions or whatever and those things collapse when they die. Some characters don't even make them, only stabilize them. But that doesn't mean they are one with it, or they are omnipresent inside it.And his death caused the collapse of the Void in the process?
I would appreciate if you drop the rude attitude. You've already been rude to Eficiente on this thread. I don't like this kind of behavior.The dude who went into a BlazBlue thread and agreed with Ultima arguing for tier 1 BlazBlue while also saying he disagrees with tier 1 BlazBlue isn’t the guy I’d say has the best sense of judgement here, especially when he only says yes or no and doesn’t elaborate.